Let's say the lakers get one of the top two picks and fall in love with either Fultz, Ball, or Smith. Would that make them open to trading Russell, In favor of designing a more balanced team? The Lakers have Julius Randle, but getting consistent play from their frontcourt has been a major Achilles heel for them. They need a big who can get buckets. There have been issues with Russell's character being questioned by his team mates and management. I do not know if this is ongoing, but I would definitely take a gamble on a player of Russell's caliber.
Let's say we get the 4th overall pick (Mentally preparing for worst case scenario) and the Lakers get a top 3 pick and take Fultz, Ball, or Smith. Do they then give up Russell for say Isaac, Tatum, Jackson, Monk, Markenaan, ect?
Is this a fair deal...
Lakers get: Terry Rozier, 4th overall pick, 36th pick
Celtics get: D'Angelo Russell, 32nd pick
That would leave one of our guards out of the rotation. My feeling is that it would be smart. Then might be a good time for the much awaited Okafor for Smart trade, which makes sense considering Phillys need for a starting caliber guard.
Thomas / Jackson / Morris (32nd pick)
Bradley / Russell / Young
Brown / Crowder / Nader
Okafor / Olynyk / Yabusele
Horford / Zizic /
Would be a great lineup moving forward. You acquire two young guys who have the potential of becoming stars while still paying them on the cheap and staying financially flexible.
Brown / Russell / Okafor has the potential to be a lethal big three IMO.
Let's do these trades before Philly and the Lakers realize it makes way too much sense to trade Russell for okafor straight up.