Marcus' issues aren't the team. It's that he is a terrible offensive player with little reason to believe he'll get much better. That's been pretty obvious from the get go. Anyone thinking differently is basing it only on hope and prayer.
Anyway, going to another team won't change any of that.
then why does the team keep pushing him to shoot.
Other than hope and prayer, there is work ethic and character. Those are the things the c's staff probably are a bit closer to than we are.
I don't get the hate for Marcus. Especially considering nearly everyone here has spent the last five years watching AB blossom from defense-only specialist, to a legit 3pt threat and competent ball handler. That happened from age 21-25 for AB.
Why can't Marcus see a similar slow growth in his offensive game? Seems like a hard worker, in a good environment.
Considering how much of an asset he is in ANY switch heavy defense, it'd be silly to hold him back at this point in his career. And for it's worth, he's looking a lot better initiating offense. One sequence in particular stood out to me last night. I think it was early in the 4th when we were mounting our comeback. In the half court, he got drove into the paint, ended up posted -- which is normally a good spot for him-- but the defense collapsed from all directions. No panic at all. Found the right play by weaving a perfect bounce pass right into Kelly's shooting hand for a three.
Avery Bradley improved through his three years. I am not Marcus does not have a chance, I am trying to be realistic instead of hopefull. Look at those numbers. Who has had worse and improved?
I'm not a numbers guy, but off the top of my head Jason Kidd comes to mind?
Kidd was never as bad a shooter as he was portrayed to be. He started off at 27.2% from three as a rookie, but year two he was 33.6% and year three he was 37%. He was then up and down all over the place until the last handful of seasons when he was quite good. In other words, Kidd always showed the ability to shoot well, he was just very inconsistent until the end of his career when he became much more of a spot up shooter (and did a lot less overall offensively).
That is not Marcus Smart. Smart is just bad and has shown no growth or improvement.
Bradley is a poor comparison. He was 0-5 as a rookie from three, but shot 40.7% his second year dropped down to 31.7% in year three and has never been below 35.2% since. In other words, Bradley always showed that he had a nice touch, he just struggled at various times with an increase role, but he also was always getting better.
Again that is not Marcus Smart.