Too much for Thompson. probably would do AB and Nets 2018 with the expectation that the Nets pick that year is still lottery but they have another season and offseason in which to improve a bit. (moving Lopez for a couple of mid-first rounders would not be surprising or a late-lottery with another first).
AB isn't inept as a shooter but he's much better on D than Klay. That 2018 pick should more than make up for the talent and contractual differences between those 2 players. question becomes who else has to go out with AB to balance the salaries in the deal
much better on D based on what? Bradley has a better DBPM and a slightly better performance at steals, that's all.
More generally about this thread, there is no doubt Thompson is the better overall player of the two, and that GSW has little interest in either trading Thompson or developing draft picks. I really do not see the point of this conversation.
Yeah seriously. I love AB's defense but one could make an argument that Thompson is the better defender. Dude can defend and is bigger than AB, thus can defend a wider range of players.
I wouldn't go with Klay as the better defender. Good defender certainly, better - no.
AB has repeatedly demonstrated the ability to seriously hamper, if not totally disrupt, the play of the guards on other teams. Been demonstrating from early in his career. While Klay is certainly a competent defender, I've never seen him frustrate his opposition on defense. Granted I don't watch GSW games like I watch C's games but just watching the 2 of them play, I'd give a solid edge to AB on defense when comparing them.
While not taking the stance that Klay is a better defender, I think you're seriously underrating his defense. Clearly he and AB are different kinds of defenders, I don't see the gap between the two being all that wide.
One was on the All NBA Defensive 1st Team. One was not on the 1st or 2nd team. One finished 6th for Defensive Player of the Year. One received no votes and was thus at best 18th.
How does voting Bradley for DPOY 2016 means you think he is
much better than Thompson?
By the same logic, Curry getting the unanimous MVP is infinitely better than any other player. You cannot quantify award votes this way.
Back to the initial question: I do not see why GSW would do such a trade. Thompson was very important in their success these last two years; and esp. in the playoffs you could say he was better than Curry.
And if the C's decided to trade both Nets picks (that's a big if), IMO our first choice will be a big who can play with Horford, not a guard since we already have plenty of them.
This is a trade idea coming out of nowhere.