In other words, some people, both before and after their 0-9 start, kept persisting that the Nets would pick up steam and hit 35 wins. And they did pick up steam. Recall that they were one blown Brook Lopez layup away from defeating Golden State on their home turf. After they picked up a few wins, there was some panicking around here and knee-jerk reactions just like yours, calling the pick "worthless" and urging Danny to trade it away.
They beat Detroit last night (it became a close game in the 4th even after the Nets had led by 21 points in the 3rd quarter) because of an aberration of a 1st half, where they shot 9-13 from 3, with Lopez hitting 4 of 5, and 71% shooting overall. That's extremely unlikely to happen again.
* I disagree with your first point. No matter how you package it, the Nets were hot garbage consistently and throughout the season. A couple of wins here and there doesn't negate that.
What was their longest win streak? 3 games?
Once Jarrett Jack went down, everyone and their brother knew the Nets were doomed.
* Your second point is way off the mark as well: The Nets were up big because
Lin was in the game --once he left, that's when their offensive numbers started to slide.
They had 71 points in the first half, but only 38 in the second because Kilpatrick took over the pg role. I will concede though, that it's unlikely Lopez will continue shooting fifty percent from three, which is just retarded.
Now without Lin, this Nets team is toast in the long run. We'll see just how much time he misses, the longer the better, cuz in this motion offense that Kenny Atkinson likes to run, Lin is their best player. Btw, Sean Kilpatrick is a decent enough sparkplug off the bench, but he's the kind of guy the longer he's in the more he's 'exposed'. He can be an absolute bricklayer some nights.