« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10   Go Down

Author Topic: Jamal Murray. 79/100 threes  (Read 29359 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Jamal Murray. 79/100 threes
« on: June 08, 2016, 01:50:37 PM »

Offline Mattybriand

  • Brad Stevens
  • Posts: 215
  • Tommy Points: 29
Love this kids confidence


Said he thought he was the best player in the draft!

https://mobile.twitter.com/Scott_Souza/status/740589807970209792

Also said the the 79/100 was after a bad start
https://mobile.twitter.com/Scott_Souza/status/740592530635563008
Logged
Re: Jamal Murray. 79/100 threes
« Reply #1 on: June 08, 2016, 01:51:50 PM »

Offline apc

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4310
  • Tommy Points: 437
Shame he is a guard.
Logged
Re: Jamal Murray. 79/100 threes
« Reply #2 on: June 08, 2016, 01:54:24 PM »

Online DefenseWinsChamps

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6759
  • Tommy Points: 812
If we don't take Bender, this is the kid I want. Take him and figure out the rotation later.
Logged
Re: Jamal Murray. 79/100 threes
« Reply #3 on: June 08, 2016, 01:57:54 PM »

Offline Evantime34

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11942
  • Tommy Points: 764
  • Eagerly Awaiting the Next Fantasy Draft
Quote from: apc on June 08, 2016, 01:51:50 PM
Shame he is a guard.
If he has a higher upside than any guard we have on the roster I don't think this is that big of an issue. They could draft him, make a commitment to go small and have a bench trio of Rozier, Murray and Smart come in as the back up 1, 2 and 3.

If we draft Bender, he probably won't play a ton his first year. Is there a big difference between drafting Murray and not playing him vs. drafting Bender and not playing him? We could easily draft Murray then let him develop slowly, who knows by the time he is ready to start maybe the back court log jam will have solved itself.

Quote from: DefenseWinsChamps on June 08, 2016, 01:54:24 PM
If we don't take Bender, this is the kid I want. Take him and figure out the rotation later.
Agreed, I've decided that I would be happy if they get Murray, Bender or Brown.
Logged
DKC:  Rockets
CB Draft: Memphis Grizz
Players: Klay Thompson, Jabari Parker, Aaron Gordon
Next 3 picks: 4.14, 4.15, 4.19
Re: Jamal Murray. 79/100 threes
« Reply #4 on: June 08, 2016, 01:58:31 PM »

Offline kozlodoev

  • NCE
  • Kevin Garnett
  • *****************
  • Posts: 17914
  • Tommy Points: 1294
Quote from: apc on June 08, 2016, 01:51:50 PM
Shame he is a guard.
If he was European, enigmatic, and playing in an obscure overseas league he'd be the consensus top pick in the draft.
Logged
"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
Re: Jamal Murray. 79/100 threes
« Reply #5 on: June 08, 2016, 02:01:58 PM »

Offline crownontherocks

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1528
  • Tommy Points: 86
Dragan Bender may not be a lottery pick in the upcoming draft, according to sources of Steve Kyler of B
Kyler reports that some teams have Bender as low as 21 on their draft boards, although ESPN's Chad Ford has him ranked No. 4 overall, as does Jonathan Givony of Draft Express. Bender could be an ideal big man in today's NBA with his ability to spread the floor and protect the paint, although he has a frail frame and foul trouble is a known issue. He'll likely take some time to develop at the NBA level, so he may not be able to establish himself as a fantasy factor during his rookie season.asketball Insiders.


Is benders stock falling?
Logged
Re: Jamal Murray. 79/100 threes
« Reply #6 on: June 08, 2016, 02:02:09 PM »

Offline Mattybriand

  • Brad Stevens
  • Posts: 215
  • Tommy Points: 29
Quote from: kozlodoev on June 08, 2016, 01:58:31 PM
Quote from: apc on June 08, 2016, 01:51:50 PM
Shame he is a guard.
If he was European, enigmatic, and playing in an obscure overseas league he'd be the consensus top pick in the draft.

Lol @ this
Logged
Re: Jamal Murray. 79/100 threes
« Reply #7 on: June 08, 2016, 02:11:25 PM »

Offline droopdog7

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7022
  • Tommy Points: 468
People paying way too much attention to the position of these players.  You pick the best player, whoever that is...every time.  If it's Murray, doesn't matter that he's a guard because you can always reshuffle afterwards.
Logged
Re: Jamal Murray. 79/100 threes
« Reply #8 on: June 08, 2016, 02:15:12 PM »

Offline TA9

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2712
  • Tommy Points: 118
  • I Bleed Green
Quote from: kozlodoev on June 08, 2016, 01:58:31 PM
Quote from: apc on June 08, 2016, 01:51:50 PM
Shame he is a guard.
If he was European, enigmatic, and playing in an obscure overseas league he'd be the consensus top pick in the draft.
TP! But you forgot non-athletic!
Logged
Jack of all trades, master of none.
Re: Jamal Murray. 79/100 threes
« Reply #9 on: June 08, 2016, 02:16:30 PM »

Offline droopdog7

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7022
  • Tommy Points: 468
Quote from: TA9 on June 08, 2016, 02:15:12 PM
Quote from: kozlodoev on June 08, 2016, 01:58:31 PM
Quote from: apc on June 08, 2016, 01:51:50 PM
Shame he is a guard.
If he was European, enigmatic, and playing in an obscure overseas league he'd be the consensus top pick in the draft.
TP! But you forgot non-athletic!
Well, there is not "if" on the non-athletic part for Murray so it seems it was not left out.
« Last Edit: June 08, 2016, 02:51:58 PM by droopdog7 »
Logged
Re: Jamal Murray. 79/100 threes
« Reply #10 on: June 08, 2016, 02:18:51 PM »

Offline kozlodoev

  • NCE
  • Kevin Garnett
  • *****************
  • Posts: 17914
  • Tommy Points: 1294
Quote from: droopdog7 on June 08, 2016, 02:16:30 PM
Quote from: TA9 on June 08, 2016, 02:15:12 PM
Quote from: kozlodoev on June 08, 2016, 01:58:31 PM
Quote from: apc on June 08, 2016, 01:51:50 PM
Shame he is a guard.
If he was European, enigmatic, and playing in an obscure overseas league he'd be the consensus top pick in the draft.
TP! But you forgot non-athletic!
Well, there is not "if" on the non-athletic part for Murray so it seems it was left out.
He's average. As a minimum, considerably better than Hield. Given his age and production, I'd love to have him at 3.
Logged
"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
Re: Jamal Murray. 79/100 threes
« Reply #11 on: June 08, 2016, 03:14:35 PM »

Offline Eddie20

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8497
  • Tommy Points: 975
Quote from: kozlodoev on June 08, 2016, 02:18:51 PM
Quote from: droopdog7 on June 08, 2016, 02:16:30 PM
Quote from: TA9 on June 08, 2016, 02:15:12 PM
Quote from: kozlodoev on June 08, 2016, 01:58:31 PM
Quote from: apc on June 08, 2016, 01:51:50 PM
Shame he is a guard.
If he was European, enigmatic, and playing in an obscure overseas league he'd be the consensus top pick in the draft.
TP! But you forgot non-athletic!
Well, there is not "if" on the non-athletic part for Murray so it seems it was left out.
He's average. As a minimum, considerably better than Hield. Given his age and production, I'd love to have him at 3.

Problem is he's an awful defender, struggles offensively versus athletic defenders, and his assists (2.2) to turnovers (2.1) is horrible for a player that projects as a combo guard. Kevin O'Conner is really down on him and has him much lower than others.
Logged
Re: Jamal Murray. 79/100 threes
« Reply #12 on: June 08, 2016, 03:23:43 PM »

Offline Evantime34

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11942
  • Tommy Points: 764
  • Eagerly Awaiting the Next Fantasy Draft
Quote from: Eddie20 on June 08, 2016, 03:14:35 PM
Quote from: kozlodoev on June 08, 2016, 02:18:51 PM
Quote from: droopdog7 on June 08, 2016, 02:16:30 PM
Quote from: TA9 on June 08, 2016, 02:15:12 PM
Quote from: kozlodoev on June 08, 2016, 01:58:31 PM
Quote from: apc on June 08, 2016, 01:51:50 PM
Shame he is a guard.
If he was European, enigmatic, and playing in an obscure overseas league he'd be the consensus top pick in the draft.
TP! But you forgot non-athletic!
Well, there is not "if" on the non-athletic part for Murray so it seems it was left out.
He's average. As a minimum, considerably better than Hield. Given his age and production, I'd love to have him at 3.

Problem is he's an awful defender, struggles offensively versus athletic defenders, and his assists (2.2) to turnovers (2.1) is horrible for a player that projects as a combo guard. Kevin O'Conner is really down on him and has him much lower than others.
What was Hield doing at the same age?
Logged
DKC:  Rockets
CB Draft: Memphis Grizz
Players: Klay Thompson, Jabari Parker, Aaron Gordon
Next 3 picks: 4.14, 4.15, 4.19
Re: Jamal Murray. 79/100 threes
« Reply #13 on: June 08, 2016, 03:26:31 PM »

Offline Surferdad

  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15241
  • Tommy Points: 1034
  • "He fiddles...and diddles..."
Quote from: Evantime34 on June 08, 2016, 03:23:43 PM
Quote from: Eddie20 on June 08, 2016, 03:14:35 PM
Quote from: kozlodoev on June 08, 2016, 02:18:51 PM
Quote from: droopdog7 on June 08, 2016, 02:16:30 PM
Quote from: TA9 on June 08, 2016, 02:15:12 PM
Quote from: kozlodoev on June 08, 2016, 01:58:31 PM
Quote from: apc on June 08, 2016, 01:51:50 PM
Shame he is a guard.
If he was European, enigmatic, and playing in an obscure overseas league he'd be the consensus top pick in the draft.
TP! But you forgot non-athletic!
Well, there is not "if" on the non-athletic part for Murray so it seems it was left out.
He's average. As a minimum, considerably better than Hield. Given his age and production, I'd love to have him at 3.

Problem is he's an awful defender, struggles offensively versus athletic defenders, and his assists (2.2) to turnovers (2.1) is horrible for a player that projects as a combo guard. Kevin O'Conner is really down on him and has him much lower than others.
What was Hield doing at the same age?
I don't like this kind of comparison.  To me, you draft based on the known talent and perhaps a bit of projection but not too much.
Logged
Re: Jamal Murray. 79/100 threes
« Reply #14 on: June 08, 2016, 03:26:35 PM »

Offline Ilikesports17

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8734
  • Tommy Points: 855
Quote from: Eddie20 on June 08, 2016, 03:14:35 PM
Quote from: kozlodoev on June 08, 2016, 02:18:51 PM
Quote from: droopdog7 on June 08, 2016, 02:16:30 PM
Quote from: TA9 on June 08, 2016, 02:15:12 PM
Quote from: kozlodoev on June 08, 2016, 01:58:31 PM
Quote from: apc on June 08, 2016, 01:51:50 PM
Shame he is a guard.
If he was European, enigmatic, and playing in an obscure overseas league he'd be the consensus top pick in the draft.
TP! But you forgot non-athletic!
Well, there is not "if" on the non-athletic part for Murray so it seems it was left out.
He's average. As a minimum, considerably better than Hield. Given his age and production, I'd love to have him at 3.

Problem is he's an awful defender, struggles offensively versus athletic defenders, and his assists (2.2) to turnovers (2.1) is horrible for a player that projects as a combo guard. Kevin O'Conner is really down on him and has him much lower than others.
Reminds me a lot of Deangelo Russell.

I think the turnover rate is a bit misleading. I believe hes better than that.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10   Go Up
« previous next »