I'm having a hard time buying into the "shooter" RJ Hunter.
His stats says that in his college career he averaged 35% from 3PT, 42% from the field overall. His last year, he averaged 39% from the field, 30% from the 3PT. That's not good numbers for a supposed "shooter" isn't it, or am I being crazy? I get that he has a quick release and he has range, but will he be able to post better numbers than that in the NBA? Also, will he be able to defend?
I just can't buy in. He's supposedly a shooter, but his efficiency is bad. Now granted, he's averaging 7 3PT's per game, so 35% could be a decent percentage because of the volume, but that's still, well, decent. Not good enough for me to get too excited.
Just to compare, the 34th pick in the draft (unfortunately by the Lakers, and this stings because he's a Stanford dude and now I have to root for him as a Laker) is Anthony Brown. His career shooting numbers in college are 42% FG, same as Hunter, 40% from 3PT (averaging 4 attempts per game), way better. His senior year he shot 43% from the field, 44% from 3PT. He's 6'7", 215 and can show he can defend. Is it crazy to suggest that we could have been better off with Anthony Brown over RJ Hunter?
Yes, I think it is crazy.
I didn't like the Rozier pick but actually like the Hunter pick.
I am actually really surprised he was available at 28 but I am happy we got him.
Like someone else mentioned, he could end up being another JJ Redick, maybe even better.
Fair, but hear me out.
Brown, statistically, seems to be a much more efficient 3PT shooter. Brown's defensive potential is definitely better than Hunter, as he's bigger and more athletic. Brown also posted those numbers playing in a better conference.
Problem with Brown is he seems like he doesn't have much offensive ability outside of spot up threes. He ranked at the absolute bottom of the draft class in 2PT%, seems quite turnover prone (poor handle). and seems like he struggles to shoot off the move, and can't finish around the basket.
Hunter by comparison is a decent ball handling, a good passer, and can shoot in a variety of situations (moving, on pull ups, spot ups, off screens, etc).
All of this combined IMO is what gives him the potential to one day become more than just a pure spot up shooter. Not necessarily high potential to become more but some potential.
Brown looks like likely to become a James Jones type, and that's about it.
I think Brown is more just a shooter, while Hunter has more potential to develop into an actual scorer (e.g. a Kevin Martin type).