Look, I'm not crazy about the draft, but some of the comments are just silly.
1, Rozier apparently had really awesome workouts and was shooting up draft boards. Its entirely possible he wouldn't have been there at 28.
2, we see college games and read reports on these guys. We aren't scouting them non-stop, and aren't in the workouts. Sure, Danny might have erred, but I doubt he didn't go with what he thought was the BPA. He's done pretty well on that front, so lets be wary of thinking we are so much better at evaluating NBA talent than our front office. You know, b/c we all have great jobs in the NBA doing just that.
3, we have PGs? I mean, I guess, but I would say Pressey might be our only real one. Turner is effective at it, but isn't really a 1. Smart is a better combo guard, and AB isn't really a 1, either. So its not like we have a logjam of legit 1s, we have a logjam of guys who play the 1. Not the same thing.
4. Yeah, Winslow. You need two to trade, and the price seems to have been unreasonably high, b/c we had plenty of ammunition to overpay a bit to get him. Do we really think others didn't try as well?
My basic point - its one thing to be critical, but at least put in some qualifiers. "Danny may have bombed this draft" is very different than "Danny bombed". We have so much less info than our front office. That doesn't mean we should blindly say they do no wrong, but we're a smarter fan base than most teams, and we shouldn't resort to "fire our GM b/c he picked a guy who Draft Express had much lower" posts. I'm not a big fan of our draft, but I'm not living in hyperbole land or anything, and I can definitely see how I could end up being wrong about it.