It helps if a player sees a very well-coached, fairly successful (for their talent level) team that needs a #1 guy. I think Doc Rivers' performance in Orlando with a crappy roster is part of why T-Mac and Grant Hill signed there, and Duncan reportedly came close.
However I think quality of organization is more important to agents than most players, and players get the most say. If we match contract offers with a worse organization it certainly won't hurt.
Orlando is also a very nice place to live with a very friendly tax environment. MA can be a tough place to make a lot of money..
TP. Great parallel between Doc in Orlando and Stevens in Boston.
I know it didn't totally work out in Orlando, but I wish we had enough cap space this summer to lure two max contract players. Wallace, Bradley and Thomas eat up a lot of our space. Luckily if we land a big fish this summer, we could lure someone else next year when the cap jumps 20 mil and pretty much everyone has cap space.
Orlando is also a very nice place to live with a very friendly tax environment. MA can be a tough place to make a lot of money..
I agree, that's why I said part of the reason. On the other hand, the weather and taxes haven't changed, but free agents aren't very interested in Orlando today, because those other factors have changed dramatically.
Boston, on the other hand, has worse weather and higher state taxes than Orlando, but has a better history, better fan base, and better overall organization than Orlando had in 99. So there are advantages on this end too. The only real point I'm trying to make is that good coaches and organizations aren't immediate game-changers, but they definitely help.