Author Topic: So do we have a definitive answer regarding rondo's value  (Read 5638 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

So do we have a definitive answer regarding rondo's value
« on: April 10, 2015, 11:36:59 PM »

Offline droopdog7

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7024
  • Tommy Points: 468
Basically, since rondo arrived there were arguments about rondos value/worth toward winning.  And while he still may be hampered to a degree due to his injury, it seems to me that we have a pretty definitive answer by now.

Rondo, while flashy and unique, simply wasn't/isn't that good.  For all his wizardry, his presence on the floor tended to take away almost as much as it added (ask the mavs about their offense when he is on the floor).  And the celts, even before never suffered much when do do didn't play.
Any arguments to the contrary?

Re: So do we have a definitive answer regarding rondo's value
« Reply #1 on: April 10, 2015, 11:44:47 PM »

Offline rondohondo

  • NCE
  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10764
  • Tommy Points: 1196
Still love his contributions until he got hurt . He almost got us past the Miami heat in 2012 with a gimpy PP and Ray .

Definitely not worth the max , but he can still be a starter on the right contender IMO

Re: So do we have a definitive answer regarding rondo's value
« Reply #2 on: April 10, 2015, 11:45:43 PM »

Offline Chris22

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5081
  • Tommy Points: 460
Rondo was good before he got hurt.


Re: So do we have a definitive answer regarding rondo's value
« Reply #3 on: April 10, 2015, 11:47:19 PM »

Offline MJohnnyboy

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2438
  • Tommy Points: 269
Here's my argument:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=moSFlvxnbgk

Rajon Rondo is the past. Time to let it go.

Re: So do we have a definitive answer regarding rondo's value
« Reply #4 on: April 11, 2015, 12:03:54 AM »

Offline makaveli

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3154
  • Tommy Points: 321
  • The Truth
Rondo was good before he got hurt.


rondo was great before "they handed him the team". he sucked that year before he got hurt, record proves it.
getting rid of rondo is a gift that keeps on giving
what doesn't kill you makes you stronger

Re: So do we have a definitive answer regarding rondo's value
« Reply #5 on: April 11, 2015, 12:05:53 AM »

Offline greece66

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7395
  • Tommy Points: 1342
  • Head Paperboy at Greenville
Still love his contributions until he got hurt . He almost got us past the Miami heat in 2012 with a gimpy PP and Ray .

Definitely not worth the max , but he can still be a starter on the right contender IMO

IMO he is now in a situation where he has to prove just that.
The fact that he was there already a couple of years ago and now has to do it again makes it all the more harder for him psychologically.
Injury apart, the other elephant in the room is the increased emphasis on shooting 3s in the NBA the last few years and the addition of many more elite PGs.
Just considering the East: Reggie Jackson (24yo), Jeff Teague (26yo),MCW (23yo) and Elfrid Payton (21yo).

Speaking more generally of PGs, I am totally against the ideat that each NBA player has an objective price tag attached to him: the value of a player to a given team is very hard to determine and depends on far too many variables.

But if there is a trend, it is that the value of PGs is going down.
Consider that in the case of both Rondo and MCW their franchises traded them for less than the media anticipated, and also the ease with which IT4 was first traded from the Kings to the Suns (a 7 mill trade exception and nr 57 of the draft...) and then from the Suns to the C's.
The same trend holds true of the draft: Mudiay is likely to stay out of the top-5 and it is debatable whether another PG will be included in the top-15/20.

Re: So do we have a definitive answer regarding rondo's value
« Reply #6 on: April 11, 2015, 12:06:47 AM »

Offline hwangjini_1

  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18337
  • Tommy Points: 2758
  • bammokja
Here's my argument:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=moSFlvxnbgk

Rajon Rondo is the past. Time to let it go.
seconded. and why is a thread on another team's player in celtics talk? mods please move it.
I believe Gandhi is the only person who knew about real democracy — not democracy as the right to go and buy what you want, but democracy as the responsibility to be accountable to everyone around you. Democracy begins with freedom from hunger, freedom from unemployment, freedom from fear, and freedom from hatred.
- Vandana Shiva

Re: So do we have a definitive answer regarding rondo's value
« Reply #7 on: April 11, 2015, 12:53:32 AM »

Offline Phil125

  • Anfernee Simons
  • Posts: 322
  • Tommy Points: 57
Rondo was great as long as he had the big three protect him.  Since he's been hurt he been above average.  Since the big 3 left he's been average.  I'm glad we got something for him.  Good luck in LA next year Rondo.

Re: So do we have a definitive answer regarding rondo's value
« Reply #8 on: April 11, 2015, 01:16:32 AM »

Offline bobbyv

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 522
  • Tommy Points: 32
Why don't we wait until the playoffs are over?

Re: So do we have a definitive answer regarding rondo's value
« Reply #9 on: April 11, 2015, 01:51:12 AM »

Offline DarkAzcura

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 644
  • Tommy Points: 100
Really not fair to say at all. Rondo actually played really well for us this season, and our offense was ranked much higher than it is right now. Our schedule was much more difficult from November-mid December. No one here will remember November 2014 a year or two from now because of the subpar record, but Rondo had that offense running like a well oiled machine. It was the defense that killed them early in the season. The defense has improved 10 fold over the last 2-3 months. He was essentially perfect for Stevens' offense, but Ainge just didn't feel comfortable paying him the max I guess.

The hindsight on Rondo, especially this season's Rondo with us, really isn't fair, imo. That schedule was brutal, and the Celtics played way above expectations offensively. Honestly, the offense was pretty beautiful to watch in November. It was unfortunate they gave up so many 4th quarter leads. There were at least 4-5 double digit leads they gave up in that month.

Re: So do we have a definitive answer regarding rondo's value
« Reply #10 on: April 11, 2015, 02:04:00 AM »

Offline LarBrd33

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21238
  • Tommy Points: 2016
Yup

2012-13

Boston with Rondo - 20-23 (46%)
Boston without Rondo - 21-17 (55%)

2013-14

Boston with Rondo - 6-24  (20%)
Boston without Rondo - 19-33 (36%)

2014-15

Boston with Rondo - 8-14 (36%)
Boston without Rondo - 29-28 (51%)

Dallas with Rondo - 24-19 (56%)
Dallas without Rondo - 24-12 (66%)

Is that enough of a sample size?

Where Tim at?



But seriously... I really liked Rondo.  He can be very effective with the right system and teammates.  I'll miss him.  I am not going to miss arguing about whether or not he was a "superstar".  He wasn't.

You guys know that he was actually having basically his best per-minute production of his career this season in Boston?  Per-36 he was averaging 12.2 assists and 8.5 rebounds... the highest of his career.   Then he goes to Dallas where he's no longer playing for a system that coddles to his whims alongside players who live to serve his stat padding... suddenly he's averaging a pedestrian 9.1 points, 6.5 assists, 4.5 rebounds, 1.2 steals, 43%/33%/38%...  Same player, different system.  (Side Note:  Evan Turner has averaged 11 points, 6.7 assists, 5.7 rebounds 1.1 steals on 43%/26%/73% since the All-star break... Best Pure Point Gahd Evah!)

Yes, we definitively know which side was right in those endless Rondo debates.  Glad we can put it behind us. 
« Last Edit: April 11, 2015, 02:15:18 AM by LarBrd33 »

Re: So do we have a definitive answer regarding rondo's value
« Reply #11 on: April 11, 2015, 02:10:49 AM »

Offline bobbyv

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 522
  • Tommy Points: 32
Yup

2012-13

Boston with Rondo - 20-23 (46%)
Boston without Rondo - 21-17 (55%)

2013-14

Boston with Rondo - 6-24  (20%)
Boston without Rondo - 19-33 (36%)

2014-15

Boston with Rondo - 8-14 (36%)
Boston without Rondo - 29-28 (51%)

Dallas with Rondo - 24-19 (56%)
Dallas without Rondo - 24-12 (66%)

Is that enough of a sample size?

Where Tim at?



But seriously... I really liked Rondo.  He can be very effective with the right system and teammates.  I'll miss him.  I am not going to miss arguing about whether or not he was a "superstar".  He wasn't.

Dallas had a joke of a schedule before the Rondo trade. However, Dallas is doing much better against top competition with Rondo than they were before. I think their record against playoff teams in the West is now 8-10 as opposed to around 2-8 without him. We also can't disregard pre injury Rondo, and the fact that age finally caught up to the big 3 in 2012-2013 season.

Re: So do we have a definitive answer regarding rondo's value
« Reply #12 on: April 11, 2015, 09:24:15 AM »

Offline kozlodoev

  • NCE
  • Kevin Garnett
  • *****************
  • Posts: 17914
  • Tommy Points: 1294
We also can't disregard pre injury Rondo, and the fact that age finally caught up to the big 3 in 2012-2013 season.
None of this affects the argument being made, except perhaps to strengthen it.
"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."

Re: So do we have a definitive answer regarding rondo's value
« Reply #13 on: April 11, 2015, 09:31:14 AM »

Offline GreenFaith1819

  • NCE
  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15402
  • Tommy Points: 2785
Here's my argument:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=moSFlvxnbgk

Rajon Rondo is the past. Time to let it go.
seconded. and why is a thread on another team's player in celtics talk? mods please move it.

Thirded.

If GreenFaith1819 (aka BBallTim Junior) can let Rondo go, why can't we ;D

I haven't commented on Rondo in about 2 weeks now ;)

Re: So do we have a definitive answer regarding rondo's value
« Reply #14 on: April 11, 2015, 10:37:22 AM »

Offline greece66

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7395
  • Tommy Points: 1342
  • Head Paperboy at Greenville
Here's my argument:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=moSFlvxnbgk

Rajon Rondo is the past. Time to let it go.
seconded. and why is a thread on another team's player in celtics talk? mods please move it.

Thirded.

If GreenFaith1819 (aka BBallTim Junior) can let Rondo go, why can't we ;D

I haven't commented on Rondo in about 2 weeks now ;)

Come on guys... LarBrd33 is having a helluva fun...
And tbh this is too much of an epically geeky Celtics fandom debate to let it go... it is going to go on for some time to come...