Young.

Young has actually outscored and outshot Dawkins this year in d-league, and he's only 19 to Dawkins's 23.

Young also likely just slipped out of the lottery at age 18 due to his auto accident, after proving his top-tier team's go-to scorer in the collegiate postseason, compared to the undrafted Dawkins, who never scored for a double digits average in four years of college.

So I'd say there's not really evidence that Dawkins is a better shooter than Young. He's presumably much more seasoned, while Young has the much higher upside.

Dawkins is a scrap heap scrub.  He doesn't belong in the big league.

One is a throughbred and one is a one trick pony, I think you know who is whom.

young has what three games red claws, at kentucky was not known for shooting and missed summer league and dawkins always known a shooter ,4yrs duke ,summer league and more d league-dawkins has a three pt shooter rep and still able to produce with hand in face .
You have a game on line today ,who gets the call for three in last seconds and why.

Young because we're trying to tank. 

Like Olynyk, Young really needs 1-2, maybe 3 seasons of solid weight training before we'll probably get a feel for his ceiling.

People mention he's weak on D... youth, inexperience, strength key factors there for me. I like his length and his effort on the defensive end so far, if not the results.

Edge to Young - maybe Dawkins is a decent and inexpensive 3rd string off guard behind Bradley and Young?

Dawkins is a way better shooter...and better overall.