Wasn't a fan of the Bradley deal but I rather have paid him that type of money than to get on a bidding war against a desperate GM trying to make us overpay for him. We could have let him go if that was the case but he's still young (22 years old) and plays great D. He's pretty below average on everything else but by the time the younger players start to emerge (2-3 year window) Bradley's contract becomes more trade-friendly. If my prediction is right about James Young being more of a SG I can see him becoming the actual starting SG over AB. Danny has plenty of assets to package Bradley away so I'm not worried about it. With the salary cap making a huge soar, the deal is a bargain, why is everyone forgetting that tidbit?
Topic: Bradley signing gets more baffling by the day (Read 8806 times)