Merge or delete my thread:
http://forums.celticsblog.com/index.php?topic=73813.0

Posted at the same time.

The problem is not the length of the game. If there's a problem, which personally I don't think there is, with the length of a match it's purely due to time wasted outside of the game's run time.

You could shorten the half time (but of course not, that's the gold mine of advertisers), reduce time-outs, shorten the time a player needs to shoot a free-throw, etc.

But reducing the actual gameplay clock is kinda idiotic, uncreative, and short-sighted.

I like they are eliminating a mandatory time out per quarter.  That seems like it could be the real time saver.

Of course if they really just wanted to save time, they could just eliminate the mandatory time out and not shorten the game.  Frankly it is the television time outs that take so much time.

Agreed. But that's the money maker.

Quote from: BudweiserCeltic on October 14, 2014, 01:31:22 PM

The problem is not the length of the game. If there's a problem, which personally I don't think there is, with the length of a match it's purely due to time wasted outside of the game's run time.

You could shorten the half time (but of course not, that's the gold mine of advertisers), reduce time-outs, shorten the time a player needs to shoot a free-throw, etc.

But reducing the actual gameplay clock is kinda idiotic, uncreative, and short-sighted.

Like you say it isn't the actual game time that is the problem it is everything surrounding the actual game that is causing the issue.

Half time, number of times outs, number of commercials....However like you state, that's where the money is. I'm sure if the shorten the game four minutes they will still find a way to keep the televised time the same length and make even more money.

Oh and TP for posting at the same time.

Here's an innovative idea as well, how about starting the game on-time?

Quote from: pearljammer10 on October 14, 2014, 01:36:00 PM

Quote from: BudweiserCeltic on October 14, 2014, 01:31:22 PM

The problem is not the length of the game. If there's a problem, which personally I don't think there is, with the length of a match it's purely due to time wasted outside of the game's run time.

You could shorten the half time (but of course not, that's the gold mine of advertisers), reduce time-outs, shorten the time a player needs to shoot a free-throw, etc.

But reducing the actual gameplay clock is kinda idiotic, uncreative, and short-sighted.

Like you say it isn't the actual game time that is the problem it is everything surrounding the actual game that is causing the issue.

Half time, number of times outs, number of commercials....However like you state, that's where the money is. I'm sure if the shorten the game four minutes they will still find a way to keep the televised time the same length and make even more money.

Oh and TP for posting at the same time.

Here's an innovative idea as well, how about starting the game on-time?

As someone who is almost chronically late to things when they require showing up in person, I strongly oppose this idea.

I don't like it.  Personally, I don't find the games to be too long anyway.  They don't even give any rationale for trying this out.  How about tossing out a reason for trying this, NBA.

I think the length of NBA games is about right.  It's not like a 3.5 hour boring baseball game.

If it's about cumulative minutes these guys rack up, then reduce the number of games.  You could keep the season just as long, but have, say, ten fewer games.  You could reduce the number of back to backs that way, and perhaps squeeze in a few more practices, of which there are too few during the season.  Might make for a better product while reducing cumulative minutes.

Anyway, I don't want four fewer minutes a game.  At. All.

Televised games are getting too long so the solution is not cutting down on mandatory timeouts for television advertising its cutting down on actual game time played. Unreal.

What's next? Let's eliminate all traveling, double dribble, offensive fouls, back court violations, and video replay to cut down on game stoppages and speed the game along that way? Are they going to eliminate all timeouts in the last two minutes of the game because it makes the game too long?

Can you even imagine hockey, baseball or football experimenting with cutting their designated play time in their game down to accommodate game length problems? 8 inning baseball? 18 minutes periods? 13 minute quarters?

The people running basketball gotta take their heads out of their butts every once in a while and realize they are really screwing around with the integrity of their product when they start doing things like this and not addressing poor officiating or the bias towards stars on the court.