Author Topic: Cap Holds =?  (Read 783 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Cap Holds =?
« on: July 07, 2014, 12:15:46 AM »

Offline celticpride1

  • Jrue Holiday
  • Posts: 382
  • Tommy Points: 40
I was just looking on Real GM and it says we still have cap hold on like Dana Barros and a Edited.  Profanity and masked profanity are against forum rules and may result in discipline. ton of people. Can someone explain this to me. If we reannounce them do we have more cap room? Or does it mean we no longer have there bird right? I mean I dont think anybody is coming off that retired list?

Re: Cap Holds =?
« Reply #1 on: July 07, 2014, 12:18:40 AM »

Offline Lucky17

  • DKC Commish
  • JoJo White
  • ****************
  • Posts: 16021
  • Tommy Points: 2352
I was just looking on Real GM and it says we still have cap hold on like Dana Barros and a **** ton of people. Can someone explain this to me. If we reannounce them do we have more cap room? Or does it mean we no longer have there bird right? I mean I dont think anybody is coming off that retired list?

Cap holds for anyone who hasn't officially retired or whose rights the Celtics never officially renounced.

Once renounced, Boston will no longer have Bird Rights. Not a big issue for Barros, obviously. But for someone like Humphries, who's received interest from other teams, renouncing cuts off the Celtics' ability to sign and trade.
DKC League is now on reddit!: http://www.reddit.com/r/dkcleague

Re: Cap Holds =?
« Reply #2 on: July 07, 2014, 12:28:55 AM »

Offline celticpride1

  • Jrue Holiday
  • Posts: 382
  • Tommy Points: 40
so why havent we just reaanonced like olwakandki and all them? Would this help us?

Re: Cap Holds =?
« Reply #3 on: July 07, 2014, 09:21:40 AM »

Offline BudweiserCeltic

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19003
  • Tommy Points: 1833
so why havent we just reaanonced like olwakandki and all them? Would this help us?

No. They aren't renounced because we haven't been in a position to have cap room in the first place for a long time, so it would be pointless.

Re: Cap Holds =?
« Reply #4 on: July 07, 2014, 09:25:32 AM »

Offline Gainesville Celtic

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5544
  • Tommy Points: 1331
  • Ainge *still* has a Posse! Ubuntu Y'all
I was just looking on Real GM and it says we still have cap hold on like Dana Barros and a **** ton of people. Can someone explain this to me. If we reannounce them do we have more cap room? Or does it mean we no longer have there bird right? I mean I dont think anybody is coming off that retired list?

The two Keiths (Van Horn and Bogans) chuckle at this.
GC's Yahoo! H2h League: Gainesville Celtics: 2014, 2016, 2017 Champs!

GC's Yahoo! H2h League permanent website (offseason roster, constitution, etc.) * Lucky was framed!

Re: Cap Holds =?
« Reply #5 on: July 07, 2014, 09:35:25 AM »

Offline LooseCannon

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11833
  • Tommy Points: 950
You basically don't bother to renounce free agents until you actually use cap space to sign a free agent.
"The worst thing that ever happened in sports was sports radio, and the internet is sports radio on steroids with lower IQs.” -- Brian Burke, former Toronto Maple Leafs senior adviser, at the 2013 MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference