I think so.
But he has to improve to the point where he is a better player then Lebron for a season.
When you look at the top 10 of all time, each one of them I bet you can make the argument that they were the best player in the league for a season or two.
I don t thnk it's unreasonable to say he's been better than LeBron this season.
I do.
He scores what - 3 PPG more than Lebron?
Lebron on the other hand is a better post scorer, better passer, better defender...
Oh and speaking of defense, Durant still doesn't know what it is. Plus he still doesn't have that killer mentality that Lebron has - he's still about as tough as tinkerbell. Until he learns to actually play some defense and lead his team to something worthwhile, he'll always be below Lebron.
Durant is more efficient than Lebron. 180 club member. Better rebounder and I have no idea how Lebron has more of a killer instinct than KD
Durant averages 31.5 PPG, 9.7 FGM and 19.1 FGA with an eFG% of 56.5%
Lebron averages 25.5 PPG, 9.3 FGM and 16.3 FGA with an eFG% of 61.1%
Durant averages an extra 2.8 FGA per game and if you multiple that by 2 (assuming the shots are 2 point FG) you get 5.6 extra points. That's basically corresponds exactly to the difference in scoring between the two players (6 PPG). That basically tells you the extra scoring Durant gets are purely a result of higher usage (i.e. more FG attempts).
If Lebron chucked the ball up three more times a night, he'd likely average right up around what Durant does.
Durant is a more well rounded scorer obviously due to his superior jump shot, but as far as the ability to put points on the board, Lebron is right up there with Durant.
You could also argue that Lebron makes up for some of that extra scoring ability with his superior passing game. The extra assist per game that equates to at least 2 PPG extra scoring from his team, meaning that he actually probably produces more points per FGA (with scoring / assists combined) than Durant does.
You say Durant is a better rebounder, but the difference in their rebounding numbers is insignificant - 7.3 RPG for Durant and 6.8 RPG for Lebron. The extra assist from Lebron is a guaranteed 2-3 points, but an extra rebound only equates to an OPPORTUNITY to score, so that's probably only worth 0.5 points or so (not sure of the exact value). Durant only averages 0.5 RPG more so that probably equates to about 0.25 extra points...nowhere near the extra that Lebron generates as a result of his extra assist per night.
Then you have defense. Lebron is one of the best defensive players in the entire league, while Durant is a poor defensive player.
That's before we even begin to start on the 'leadership' argument. Lebron has led the Heat to back-to-back championships and is well on target to contend for a third. Durant has made the finals only one time, and when he did his team almost got swept...defeated in 5 games.
Of course you'll throw up the argument of Lebron's other 'talent' but when it's OKC you're talking about, this is definately not a fair argument. Durant has had Westbrook, Harden, Ibaka over the years - at least a match for the level of talent that Lebron has had in Miami.
People are just too obsessed with scoring these days. Guys like Durant, Curry, Harden get way too much credit for being one dimensional guys that only play on the offensive end.
I have far more respect for guys like Lebron who can dominate a game on both ends of the floor - much like Kobe and Jordan in their primes. That's why I'd take a guy like Lebron (or even Paul George) over Durant without a second thought.