Author Topic: I like the way the Celtics play without Rondo  (Read 39166 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: I like the way the Celtics play without Rondo
« Reply #105 on: February 10, 2014, 06:38:02 PM »

Offline Tr1boy

  • Paul Pierce
  • ***************************
  • Posts: 27260
  • Tommy Points: 867
Funny what people remember.  I remember that the Celtics really did play better after Rondo got hurt last year.  They won more games.  It wasn't a mirage.  That lasted until Garnett got injured and missed some games.  He came back and was never quite healthy in my opinion.

I believe the struggles in the playoffs had more to with Garnett than Rondo.  I don't believe Rondo ever "carried" the Celtics through any playoffs, that was always Garnett 1 and Pierce 1A.  Even last season, Garnett playing better made up for what we lost in Rondo.  It was about KG, not Rondo.

All that said, I like the game that Rondo is trying to play so far this year.  I think he has improved his shooting and his approach.  He can't make this team all that much better though, as evidenced by Sunday's game.  Rondo is Rondo, good but limited by flaws.

Agree on all counts.

I do want to add the injuries to Sullinger and Barbosa as probably another reason we lost to the Knicks in the playoffs. Also, because of the Barbosa injury we were forced to trade Collins, something we really didn't want to do, in order to acquire Crawford, who didn't play too well for us last season.

Isn't the greatest indictment of where Rondo stands as a "star player" made by Doc? Hard to leave a team you have been with for so many seasons when you have a "top 5 player" (looking at you Tim) on your team.

+1 . The guy left for Chris Paul to lead his team.

If KG and PP were going to be kept but Rondo traded instead, i'm sure Doc would of stayed for another year still

I been a Rondo fan since he was drafted. But that Rondo thought less and utilized his physical tools more.  He was ALL over the court.  The Rondo as of recent (from last year when given the torch to lead) plays like a 37 year old vet , especially at the defensive end. 

People say he is conserving his energy and playoff rondo is a one man team. Well if thats true, thats horrible bc he should play like playoff rondo 24/7 as much as possible. Lebron, Durant, now George do it on a daily basis, so there is little to no excuse.

If Rondo can't go back to being "all over the court" rondo, then he should be traded to be on a stacked team. Better for everybody

Re: I like the way the Celtics play without Rondo
« Reply #106 on: February 10, 2014, 06:38:42 PM »

Offline CelticG1

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4201
  • Tommy Points: 288
So this isnt a pro tanking thread?

Re: I like the way the Celtics play without Rondo
« Reply #107 on: February 10, 2014, 06:49:23 PM »

Offline pokeKingCurtis

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3733
  • Tommy Points: 280
This was the general sentiment of the blog last season after Rondo went down. And then look what happened to us in the playoffs. Easy concept, you don't win without stars.

I don't think that was the general sentiment of the blog last season.  Certainly some vocal people were yelling & screaming that the Celtics were better without Rondo but there were also plenty of people here calling that viewpoint a mirage (one which was ultimately realized, IMO).

  As one of the "mirage" people, I think I was generally outnumbered in the discussions, at least until the playoffs started.

Well, let's be honest, you are also one of the biggest ligthtning rods on here when it comes to Rondo discussion.  Given your active involvement in those debates, it was only natural you were getting more of the brunt of it than other people claiming it was a mirage.

  It's true I end up in many of the Rondo discussions but it's also true that I rarely start any of the conversations. It's not like I was starting threads about how the wins without Rondo were a mirage, it's more that I was responding to some of the multitude of "THIS TEAM is better without Rondo" posts.

Also true for tank threads.

According to Tim, Rondo is a top 5 player and has been the best player on the team since the 09-10 season. It was never about KG or Pierce, but about Rondo. Rondo and Sullinger were returning from injury, they added Olynyk, and added a few veterans (Hump, Wallace, Bogans) to off-set the losses of KG and Pierce. So isn't only logical that the team could actually better their 1st rd exit the year before by having their "Top 5" guy back along with those other players?

Rondo is a very good player, but not nowhere the player people think he is. He's made 4 all-star team, yes, terrific. Joe Johnson has made 7. Is Joe Johnson that great?

Way to twist his words.

Just because he doesn't agree with some posters' assessment of Rondo, doesn't mean he thinks Rondo is a LeBron caliber player.

Re: I like the way the Celtics play without Rondo
« Reply #108 on: February 10, 2014, 06:50:24 PM »

Offline RJ87

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11954
  • Tommy Points: 1431
  • Let's Go Celtics!
Funny what people remember.  I remember that the Celtics really did play better after Rondo got hurt last year.  They won more games.  It wasn't a mirage.  That lasted until Garnett got injured and missed some games.  He came back and was never quite healthy in my opinion.

I believe the struggles in the playoffs had more to with Garnett than Rondo.  I don't believe Rondo ever "carried" the Celtics through any playoffs, that was always Garnett 1 and Pierce 1A.  Even last season, Garnett playing better made up for what we lost in Rondo.  It was about KG, not Rondo.

All that said, I like the game that Rondo is trying to play so far this year.  I think he has improved his shooting and his approach.  He can't make this team all that much better though, as evidenced by Sunday's game.  Rondo is Rondo, good but limited by flaws.

Agree on all counts.

I do want to add the injuries to Sullinger and Barbosa as probably another reason we lost to the Knicks in the playoffs. Also, because of the Barbosa injury we were forced to trade Collins, something we really didn't want to do, in order to acquire Crawford, who didn't play too well for us last season.

Isn't the greatest indictment of where Rondo stands as a "star player" made by Doc? Hard to leave a team you have been with for so many seasons when you have a "top 5 player" (looking at you Tim) on your team.

  If you were Doc, would you rather be on a team with 1 star or a team with multiple stars? Doc left when he saw a team that wasn't going to contend. But he didn't leave after 2012, he left after 2013. Meaning he thought that the 2013 team could contend, meaning he thought that if you added Rondo to the team that barely escaped getting swept in the first round you could contend. Hardly an indictment against Rondo, more of an indictment about the rest of the team.

So a coach who is in a place for 9 years, loves the city, has established roots, won a title, has a good rapport with management and ownership still leaves a "top 5 player" entering his prime? This is definitely uncharted waters. Truth is that if Doc really felt Rondo was the star you claim, he would've never left. Rondo is a piece, a very good piece, but not nearly good enough to be the best player on a championship team. Doc knew it and his current residency proves it.

Since we're playing the "I know what Doc is thinking game", the records of each team in question should give good insight into Doc leaving. Top 5 player or not, Doc didn't want to go through a rebuild. We really had no viable assets to acquire additional talent to immediately contend - there aren't many coaches who are a few years removed from an NBA title that would happily sit through a rebuild.

But that's exactly the point. According to Tim, Rondo is a top 5 player and has been the best player on the team since the 09-10 season. It was never about KG or Pierce, but about Rondo. Rondo and Sullinger were returning from injury, they added Olynyk, and added a few veterans (Hump, Wallace, Bogans) to off-set the losses of KG and Pierce. So isn't only logical that the team could actually better their 1st rd exit the year before by having their "Top 5" guy back along with those other players?

Rondo is a very good player, but not nowhere the player people think he is. He's made 4 all-star team, yes, terrific. Joe Johnson has made 7. Is Joe Johnson that great?

Why did you cut off the 2nd part of my post?

Anyway, the minute DA traded KG and Pierce the writing was on the wall. We were not a team looking to make the playoffs, we were looking to nab a high draft pick. No Rondo for the first part of the season + Sully coming off of back surgery + Green/Bradley/KO/Hump/Wallace wasn't fooling anyone into thinking that was a playoff caliber team. I think you're argument is fundamentally flawed.

Doc has built a reputation as an elite coach - whether that's deserved or not is it's own debate. But how many elite coaches are coaching teams with no realistic shot. Let's also not forget that in addition to coaching a playoff team, Doc is also VP of Basketball Operations for the LAC. I'm sure if we handed Doc Danny's job + acquired Blake Griffin, he'd still be around.
2021 Houston Rockets
PG: Kyrie Irving/Patty Mills/Jalen Brunson
SG: OG Anunoby/Norman Powell/Matisse Thybulle
SF: Gordon Hayward/Demar Derozan
PF: Giannis Antetokounmpo/Robert Covington
C: Kristaps Porzingis/Bobby Portis/James Wiseman

Re: I like the way the Celtics play without Rondo
« Reply #109 on: February 10, 2014, 07:02:06 PM »

Offline BballTim

  • Dave Cowens
  • ***********************
  • Posts: 23724
  • Tommy Points: 1123
Funny what people remember.  I remember that the Celtics really did play better after Rondo got hurt last year.  They won more games.  It wasn't a mirage.  That lasted until Garnett got injured and missed some games.  He came back and was never quite healthy in my opinion.

I believe the struggles in the playoffs had more to with Garnett than Rondo.  I don't believe Rondo ever "carried" the Celtics through any playoffs, that was always Garnett 1 and Pierce 1A.  Even last season, Garnett playing better made up for what we lost in Rondo.  It was about KG, not Rondo.

All that said, I like the game that Rondo is trying to play so far this year.  I think he has improved his shooting and his approach.  He can't make this team all that much better though, as evidenced by Sunday's game.  Rondo is Rondo, good but limited by flaws.

Agree on all counts.

I do want to add the injuries to Sullinger and Barbosa as probably another reason we lost to the Knicks in the playoffs. Also, because of the Barbosa injury we were forced to trade Collins, something we really didn't want to do, in order to acquire Crawford, who didn't play too well for us last season.

Isn't the greatest indictment of where Rondo stands as a "star player" made by Doc? Hard to leave a team you have been with for so many seasons when you have a "top 5 player" (looking at you Tim) on your team.

  If you were Doc, would you rather be on a team with 1 star or a team with multiple stars? Doc left when he saw a team that wasn't going to contend. But he didn't leave after 2012, he left after 2013. Meaning he thought that the 2013 team could contend, meaning he thought that if you added Rondo to the team that barely escaped getting swept in the first round you could contend. Hardly an indictment against Rondo, more of an indictment about the rest of the team.

So a coach who is in a place for 9 years, loves the city, has established roots, won a title, has a good rapport with management and ownership still leaves a "top 5 player" entering his prime? This is definitely uncharted waters. Truth is that if Doc really felt Rondo was the star you claim, he would've never left. Rondo is a piece, a very good piece, but not nearly good enough to be the best player on a championship team. Doc knew it and his current residency proves it.

  You don't follow the team too closely. Doc was talking about leaving the Celts as far back as 2010.

Re: I like the way the Celtics play without Rondo
« Reply #110 on: February 10, 2014, 07:15:07 PM »

Offline Tr1boy

  • Paul Pierce
  • ***************************
  • Posts: 27260
  • Tommy Points: 867
This was the general sentiment of the blog last season after Rondo went down. And then look what happened to us in the playoffs. Easy concept, you don't win without stars.

I don't think that was the general sentiment of the blog last season.  Certainly some vocal people were yelling & screaming that the Celtics were better without Rondo but there were also plenty of people here calling that viewpoint a mirage (one which was ultimately realized, IMO).

  As one of the "mirage" people, I think I was generally outnumbered in the discussions, at least until the playoffs started.

Well, let's be honest, you are also one of the biggest ligthtning rods on here when it comes to Rondo discussion.  Given your active involvement in those debates, it was only natural you were getting more of the brunt of it than other people claiming it was a mirage.

  It's true I end up in many of the Rondo discussions but it's also true that I rarely start any of the conversations. It's not like I was starting threads about how the wins without Rondo were a mirage, it's more that I was responding to some of the multitude of "THIS TEAM is better without Rondo" posts.

Also true for tank threads.

According to Tim, Rondo is a top 5 player and has been the best player on the team since the 09-10 season. It was never about KG or Pierce, but about Rondo. Rondo and Sullinger were returning from injury, they added Olynyk, and added a few veterans (Hump, Wallace, Bogans) to off-set the losses of KG and Pierce. So isn't only logical that the team could actually better their 1st rd exit the year before by having their "Top 5" guy back along with those other players?

Rondo is a very good player, but not nowhere the player people think he is. He's made 4 all-star team, yes, terrific. Joe Johnson has made 7. Is Joe Johnson that great?

Way to twist his words.

Just because he doesn't agree with some posters' assessment of Rondo, doesn't mean he thinks Rondo is a LeBron caliber player.

Are you sure about that?

The main reason i started this thread was i'm tired of the way Rondo has evolved or declined. He knows how to get assists, he knows the game. He was taught from ground up by DOC and has been surrounded by three future HOF. He has been great at the playoffs before

But that doesn't mean you stop doing the things that got you here . That doesn't mean, to stop diving for the ball, take charges, go after the ball for offensive rebounds.  It doesn't mean bc you did alot of the dirty/garbage jobs in the past , you don't have to anymore.  Rondos adv vs other guards is his physical tools. But he thinks now he is on the same level as the elites of the league or top pgs.  But the truth is , he is not.  He was surrounded by great players that made the game a little easier for him to play

He has to go back to playing the same blue collar version that can help you steal games.  And if he cant or wont, and wants to play chess on the basketball court , then its going to be a long while until we contend again

Re: I like the way the Celtics play without Rondo
« Reply #111 on: February 10, 2014, 07:17:09 PM »

Offline BballTim

  • Dave Cowens
  • ***********************
  • Posts: 23724
  • Tommy Points: 1123
Funny what people remember.  I remember that the Celtics really did play better after Rondo got hurt last year.  They won more games.  It wasn't a mirage.  That lasted until Garnett got injured and missed some games.  He came back and was never quite healthy in my opinion.

I believe the struggles in the playoffs had more to with Garnett than Rondo.  I don't believe Rondo ever "carried" the Celtics through any playoffs, that was always Garnett 1 and Pierce 1A.  Even last season, Garnett playing better made up for what we lost in Rondo.  It was about KG, not Rondo.

All that said, I like the game that Rondo is trying to play so far this year.  I think he has improved his shooting and his approach.  He can't make this team all that much better though, as evidenced by Sunday's game.  Rondo is Rondo, good but limited by flaws.

Agree on all counts.

I do want to add the injuries to Sullinger and Barbosa as probably another reason we lost to the Knicks in the playoffs. Also, because of the Barbosa injury we were forced to trade Collins, something we really didn't want to do, in order to acquire Crawford, who didn't play too well for us last season.

Isn't the greatest indictment of where Rondo stands as a "star player" made by Doc? Hard to leave a team you have been with for so many seasons when you have a "top 5 player" (looking at you Tim) on your team.

+1 . The guy left for Chris Paul to lead his team.

If KG and PP were going to be kept but Rondo traded instead, i'm sure Doc would of stayed for another year still

  "i'm sure" = "I have no idea".

Re: I like the way the Celtics play without Rondo
« Reply #112 on: February 10, 2014, 07:22:46 PM »

Offline Tr1boy

  • Paul Pierce
  • ***************************
  • Posts: 27260
  • Tommy Points: 867
Funny what people remember.  I remember that the Celtics really did play better after Rondo got hurt last year.  They won more games.  It wasn't a mirage.  That lasted until Garnett got injured and missed some games.  He came back and was never quite healthy in my opinion.

I believe the struggles in the playoffs had more to with Garnett than Rondo.  I don't believe Rondo ever "carried" the Celtics through any playoffs, that was always Garnett 1 and Pierce 1A.  Even last season, Garnett playing better made up for what we lost in Rondo.  It was about KG, not Rondo.

All that said, I like the game that Rondo is trying to play so far this year.  I think he has improved his shooting and his approach.  He can't make this team all that much better though, as evidenced by Sunday's game.  Rondo is Rondo, good but limited by flaws.

Agree on all counts.

I do want to add the injuries to Sullinger and Barbosa as probably another reason we lost to the Knicks in the playoffs. Also, because of the Barbosa injury we were forced to trade Collins, something we really didn't want to do, in order to acquire Crawford, who didn't play too well for us last season.

Isn't the greatest indictment of where Rondo stands as a "star player" made by Doc? Hard to leave a team you have been with for so many seasons when you have a "top 5 player" (looking at you Tim) on your team.

+1 . The guy left for Chris Paul to lead his team.

If KG and PP were going to be kept but Rondo traded instead, i'm sure Doc would of stayed for another year still

  "i'm sure" = "I have no idea".

Nobody knows but Doc certainly didn't stay with the team with Rondo left behind did he?

Doc was watching closely as to what was happening with KG and PP. As soon as he found out they weren't going to be back next year, he was the first one out of here.

He kept talking about that he didn't want to rebuild like Rondo didn't matter

Re: I like the way the Celtics play without Rondo
« Reply #113 on: February 10, 2014, 07:32:35 PM »

Offline BballTim

  • Dave Cowens
  • ***********************
  • Posts: 23724
  • Tommy Points: 1123
This was the general sentiment of the blog last season after Rondo went down. And then look what happened to us in the playoffs. Easy concept, you don't win without stars.

I don't think that was the general sentiment of the blog last season.  Certainly some vocal people were yelling & screaming that the Celtics were better without Rondo but there were also plenty of people here calling that viewpoint a mirage (one which was ultimately realized, IMO).

  As one of the "mirage" people, I think I was generally outnumbered in the discussions, at least until the playoffs started.

Well, let's be honest, you are also one of the biggest ligthtning rods on here when it comes to Rondo discussion.  Given your active involvement in those debates, it was only natural you were getting more of the brunt of it than other people claiming it was a mirage.

  It's true I end up in many of the Rondo discussions but it's also true that I rarely start any of the conversations. It's not like I was starting threads about how the wins without Rondo were a mirage, it's more that I was responding to some of the multitude of "THIS TEAM is better without Rondo" posts.

Also true for tank threads.

According to Tim, Rondo is a top 5 player and has been the best player on the team since the 09-10 season. It was never about KG or Pierce, but about Rondo. Rondo and Sullinger were returning from injury, they added Olynyk, and added a few veterans (Hump, Wallace, Bogans) to off-set the losses of KG and Pierce. So isn't only logical that the team could actually better their 1st rd exit the year before by having their "Top 5" guy back along with those other players?

Rondo is a very good player, but not nowhere the player people think he is. He's made 4 all-star team, yes, terrific. Joe Johnson has made 7. Is Joe Johnson that great?

Way to twist his words.

Just because he doesn't agree with some posters' assessment of Rondo, doesn't mean he thinks Rondo is a LeBron caliber player.

Are you sure about that?

The main reason i started this thread was i'm tired of the way Rondo has evolved or declined. He knows how to get assists, he knows the game. He was taught from ground up by DOC and has been surrounded by three future HOF. He has been great at the playoffs before

But that doesn't mean you stop doing the things that got you here . That doesn't mean, to stop diving for the ball, take charges, go after the ball for offensive rebounds.  It doesn't mean bc you did alot of the dirty/garbage jobs in the past , you don't have to anymore.  Rondos adv vs other guards is his physical tools. But he thinks now he is on the same level as the elites of the league or top pgs.  But the truth is , he is not.  He was surrounded by great players that made the game a little easier for him to play

He has to go back to playing the same blue collar version that can help you steal games.  And if he cant or wont, and wants to play chess on the basketball court , then its going to be a long while until we contend again

  Rondo got 1.1 OReb/game in 2013, he's never been higher than 1.3 OReb/game. Also, and almost on cue, Rondo took significantly more charges per game in 2013 than he had in 07, 08, 09, 10 or 12 (couldn't find the numbers for 2011).  The majority of observation you make about Rondo that can be measured statistically are shown to be the complete opposite of what happens on the court.

Re: I like the way the Celtics play without Rondo
« Reply #114 on: February 10, 2014, 07:33:24 PM »

Offline pokeKingCurtis

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3733
  • Tommy Points: 280
This was the general sentiment of the blog last season after Rondo went down. And then look what happened to us in the playoffs. Easy concept, you don't win without stars.

I don't think that was the general sentiment of the blog last season.  Certainly some vocal people were yelling & screaming that the Celtics were better without Rondo but there were also plenty of people here calling that viewpoint a mirage (one which was ultimately realized, IMO).

  As one of the "mirage" people, I think I was generally outnumbered in the discussions, at least until the playoffs started.

Well, let's be honest, you are also one of the biggest ligthtning rods on here when it comes to Rondo discussion.  Given your active involvement in those debates, it was only natural you were getting more of the brunt of it than other people claiming it was a mirage.

  It's true I end up in many of the Rondo discussions but it's also true that I rarely start any of the conversations. It's not like I was starting threads about how the wins without Rondo were a mirage, it's more that I was responding to some of the multitude of "THIS TEAM is better without Rondo" posts.

Also true for tank threads.

According to Tim, Rondo is a top 5 player and has been the best player on the team since the 09-10 season. It was never about KG or Pierce, but about Rondo. Rondo and Sullinger were returning from injury, they added Olynyk, and added a few veterans (Hump, Wallace, Bogans) to off-set the losses of KG and Pierce. So isn't only logical that the team could actually better their 1st rd exit the year before by having their "Top 5" guy back along with those other players?

Rondo is a very good player, but not nowhere the player people think he is. He's made 4 all-star team, yes, terrific. Joe Johnson has made 7. Is Joe Johnson that great?

Way to twist his words.

Just because he doesn't agree with some posters' assessment of Rondo, doesn't mean he thinks Rondo is a LeBron caliber player.

Are you sure about that?

The main reason i started this thread was i'm tired of the way Rondo has evolved or declined. He knows how to get assists, he knows the game. He was taught from ground up by DOC and has been surrounded by three future HOF. He has been great at the playoffs before

But that doesn't mean you stop doing the things that got you here . That doesn't mean, to stop diving for the ball, take charges, go after the ball for offensive rebounds.  It doesn't mean bc you did alot of the dirty/garbage jobs in the past , you don't have to anymore.  Rondos adv vs other guards is his physical tools. But he thinks now he is on the same level as the elites of the league or top pgs.  But the truth is , he is not.  He was surrounded by great players that made the game a little easier for him to play

He has to go back to playing the same blue collar version that can help you steal games.  And if he cant or wont, and wants to play chess on the basketball court , then its going to be a long while until we contend again

Yes. I'm quite certain very few, if any, posters are as "deluded" as some insinuate them to be.

For one, Rondo's recovering from surgery. You seem to expect him to go 110% every night but right now he probably can't go that hard. Even the notion that a player should go 110% every night, night in, night out is in itself an impossible task.

Rondo did sacrifice his body, drawing 2 charges against ORL the other night. Everyone seems to forget how he returned despite an ugly elbow injury. I personally don't think he's lost his heart and hustle at all.

Lastly, I'm not sure if you're implying that Rondo should stop playing smart basketball. Westbrook and Avery Bradley are guys who, I think, fit your description and I don't think Rondo's as physically gifted as Westbrook at least. And while Westbrook and AB hustle a lot, they're very prone to dumb plays.

Re: I like the way the Celtics play without Rondo
« Reply #115 on: February 10, 2014, 07:45:58 PM »

Offline sed522002

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2280
  • Tommy Points: 221
Quote
But that doesn't mean you stop doing the things that got you here . That doesn't mean, to stop diving for the ball, take charges, go after the ball for offensive rebounds.  It doesn't mean bc you did alot of the dirty/garbage jobs in the past , you don't have to anymore. 

Are we even watching the same game? He was taking more charges last year than most on the team and since he's come back from injury he's taking charges (some weren't called). He does the hustle plays and dives for the loose balls. I don't expect to see him diving for loose balls just yet right now, but I'm really trying to understand what you're watching (or not watching for that matter)bases off those things you listed.

Re: I like the way the Celtics play without Rondo
« Reply #116 on: February 10, 2014, 09:28:11 PM »

Offline sunnyd656

  • The Green Kornet
  • Posts: 88
  • Tommy Points: 21
Can't wait for the "I miss Rondo" threads.
  Every year there are 6-7 teams with a lower winning percentage than our current record. I think we've gotten so used to ignoring the bottom feeders since 2008 that we've forgotten how bad some teams are.

Re: I like the way the Celtics play without Rondo
« Reply #117 on: February 10, 2014, 10:07:05 PM »

Offline Tr1boy

  • Paul Pierce
  • ***************************
  • Posts: 27260
  • Tommy Points: 867
Can't wait for the "I miss Rondo" threads.

I can.

Alot more speed on both ends of the court today

Re: I like the way the Celtics play without Rondo
« Reply #118 on: February 10, 2014, 10:25:16 PM »

Offline D.o.s.

  • NCE
  • Cedric Maxwell
  • **************
  • Posts: 14061
  • Tommy Points: 1239
You realize they beat the bucks, right?
At least a goldfish with a Lincoln Log on its back goin' across your floor to your sock drawer has a miraculous connotation to it.

Re: I like the way the Celtics play without Rondo
« Reply #119 on: February 10, 2014, 10:27:35 PM »

Offline BballTim

  • Dave Cowens
  • ***********************
  • Posts: 23724
  • Tommy Points: 1123
Can't wait for the "I miss Rondo" threads.

I can.

Alot more speed on both ends of the court today

  It looks like we played at a slightly faster pace against Dallas than we did today.