Total Members Voted: 58
Voting closed: March 09, 2014, 04:58:54 PM
0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: LooseCannon on December 09, 2013, 04:45:26 PMQuote from: billysan on December 09, 2013, 03:58:55 PMI would offer him 3 years at the midlevel exception with 2 guaranteed and an off the bench role. I think he would be an asset and I hated losing him.Why not ask him if he is willing to take the minimum (or the bi-annual exception) so that the Celtics can use the MLE on another player?This.Id love Pierce back on the Cs next year, but would be disappointed if it was for the full mid-level. Not that Pierce wouldnt be worth it, but I think theres a point as an aging vet when it comes down to Im just happy to be playing in a situation Im comfortable with. If things dont straighten themselves out in Brooklyn, and potential contenders like Indiana, OKC, Golden State, San Antonio, etc. were going after him, Id have no problem with him taking the full mid-level (or more) from them, but if he comes to Boston, it cant be about the money. End your career here, know were probably not competing for a championship, know the torch has been passed, know youre in a supporting role, know youre a mentor, and just run with it and enjoy it.If Pierce would only come back to the C's for the mid-level, I'd be disappointed with him. Again, not that Id have any problem with him if he went ring chasing and signed somewhere else for that, but if you want to end your career with the Cs, a team thats not competing, dont make it about money. The Cs already signed you to $185m worth of contracts and youve never once been underpaid (excluding rookie contracts).Something much less than the mid-level, and I'd be very happy with it.
Quote from: billysan on December 09, 2013, 03:58:55 PMI would offer him 3 years at the midlevel exception with 2 guaranteed and an off the bench role. I think he would be an asset and I hated losing him.Why not ask him if he is willing to take the minimum (or the bi-annual exception) so that the Celtics can use the MLE on another player?
I would offer him 3 years at the midlevel exception with 2 guaranteed and an off the bench role. I think he would be an asset and I hated losing him.
He'll retire in green one way or another. If it's not some exception, it'll be a 10-day.I'd love to have him back on the team; I think he's still capable of playing at a high level.
I remember him saying that someday he'd want to sign with the Celtics for one day just so he could retire in green.
I would take pierce back, but i would want to sign him for just 1 year at a time. Whether it is for a whole season or just one game, I would love for his last game in the NBA to be played while wearing a Celtic jersey.
never should have let him go in the first placehe was not the problem and would have been perfect for this current team
Quote from: BASS_THUMPER on December 09, 2013, 10:30:18 PMnever should have let him go in the first placehe was not the problem and would have been perfect for this current teamThis makes no sense.