« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 4   Go Down

Author Topic: with rondo would we still be 0-3??  (Read 12685 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

with rondo would we still be 0-3??
« on: November 04, 2013, 03:21:17 PM »

Offline Tr1boy

  • Paul Pierce
  • ***************************
  • Posts: 27260
  • Tommy Points: 867
Imo no, but also not 3-0 either.

1-2?

The last game we lost mainly due to big turnovers made by both jcraw and ab. With rondo we sneak by for the win

First two games we lose either way.

With westbrook fastracking his way back into the lineup, could that be a possibility with rondo?
Logged
Re: with rondo would we still be 0-3??
« Reply #1 on: November 04, 2013, 03:23:00 PM »

Offline PhoSita

  • NCE
  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21835
  • Tommy Points: 2182
Westbrook had a different injury.
Logged
You’ll have to excuse my lengthiness—the reason I dread writing letters is because I am so apt to get to slinging wisdom & forget to let up. Thus much precious time is lost.
- Mark Twain
Re: with rondo would we still be 0-3??
« Reply #2 on: November 04, 2013, 03:25:37 PM »

Offline Tr1boy

  • Paul Pierce
  • ***************************
  • Posts: 27260
  • Tommy Points: 867
Quote from: PhoSita on November 04, 2013, 03:23:00 PM
Westbrook had a different injury.

I thought it was the same level of severity. Both didnt even know it was torn vs rose who was in noticeable pain
Logged
Re: with rondo would we still be 0-3??
« Reply #3 on: November 04, 2013, 03:29:03 PM »

Offline SHAQATTACK

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 37808
  • Tommy Points: 3030
I think we would have won the first game ,....lost next two

Maybe all three,  possible ,  but I doubt it .

He needs NOT to play till after Christmas .

I'm sure he know the score .....he knows what DA's up to.

Logged
Re: with rondo would we still be 0-3??
« Reply #4 on: November 04, 2013, 03:55:40 PM »

Offline LarBrd33

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21238
  • Tommy Points: 2016
With a fully healthy Rondo, I think this team has a ceiling of 38 wins.  That's the absolute peak this team can achieve and even that is a major stretch. 

Without him... there's no limit to how terrible we can be.  I kinda expect we'll ask Rondo to pull a 2007 Paul Pierce and sit the majority of this season out. Maybe a Jan/Feb return, he'll play a handful of games... he'll have unforeseen "setbacks"... I'd be surprised to see him play more than 30 games this year.  But just in case he throws a wrench on our tank party, I drafted him on my fantasy bball team.  I've got all the bases covered this year. 
Logged
Re: with rondo would we still be 0-3??
« Reply #5 on: November 04, 2013, 03:56:04 PM »

Offline Atzar

  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10244
  • Tommy Points: 1893
With a healthy Rondo, I think we win all three games.
Logged
Re: with rondo would we still be 0-3??
« Reply #6 on: November 04, 2013, 03:59:55 PM »

Offline TwinTower14

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1119
  • Tommy Points: 48
Healthy Rondo, who never got injured, probably 1-2.  Rondo is good to very good but he still doesn't solve their 4th quarter issues with scoring that the C's have had for the last 4 or 5 seasons...
Logged
Re: with rondo would we still be 0-3??
« Reply #7 on: November 04, 2013, 04:00:00 PM »

Offline LarBrd33

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21238
  • Tommy Points: 2016
Quote from: Atzar on November 04, 2013, 03:56:04 PM
With a healthy Rondo, I think we win all three games.
They were 3 winnable games against bad-to-mediocre teams.  Luckily Rondo sat out and we started off the tank job right.

I'm still waiting for the inevitable blowout by a competent team.  Memphis seems like a good candidate to stomp us tonight. They are only 1-2, but they are likely a playoff team this year.   
Logged
Re: with rondo would we still be 0-3??
« Reply #8 on: November 04, 2013, 10:46:13 PM »

Offline frombirdtogarnett

  • Jordan Walsh
  • Posts: 24
  • Tommy Points: 0
Does soembody really need to explain to you the difference between a Mencius tear and an ACL tear? Really?

Quote from: triboy16f on November 04, 2013, 03:25:37 PM
Quote from: PhoSita on November 04, 2013, 03:23:00 PM
Westbrook had a different injury.

I thought it was the same level of severity. Both didnt even know it was torn vs rose who was in noticeable pain
Logged
Re: with rondo would we still be 0-3??
« Reply #9 on: November 04, 2013, 10:47:52 PM »

Offline Celtics18

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11688
  • Tommy Points: 1469
My guess is 2 and 2.
Logged
DKC Seventy-Sixers:

PG: G. Hill/D. Schroder
SG: C. Lee/B. Hield/T. Luwawu
SF:  Giannis/J. Lamb/M. Kuzminskas
PF:  E. Ilyasova/J. Jerebko/R. Christmas
C:    N. Vucevic/K. Olynyk/E. Davis/C. Jefferson
Re: with rondo would we still be 0-3??
« Reply #10 on: November 04, 2013, 10:56:54 PM »

Offline SHAQATTACK

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 37808
  • Tommy Points: 3030
I ll go 2 and 2 after four
Logged
Re: with rondo would we still be 0-3??
« Reply #11 on: November 04, 2013, 10:57:17 PM »

Offline BudweiserCeltic

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19003
  • Tommy Points: 1833
4-0
Logged
Re: with rondo would we still be 0-3??
« Reply #12 on: November 04, 2013, 11:00:54 PM »

Offline Snakehead

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6846
  • Tommy Points: 448
I really think we'd be 3-1.
Logged
"I really don't want people to understand me." - Jordan Crawford
Re: with rondo would we still be 0-3??
« Reply #13 on: November 04, 2013, 11:02:58 PM »

Offline Kuberski33

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7378
  • Tommy Points: 570
2-2.  No scorer who can consistently create his own shot.   But Rondo at least gets the ball where it needs to go to give you the best chance.

Logged
Re: with rondo would we still be 0-3??
« Reply #14 on: November 04, 2013, 11:03:13 PM »

Offline BballTim

  • Dave Cowens
  • ***********************
  • Posts: 23724
  • Tommy Points: 1123

  We're last in the league in assists and first in the league in turnovers committed. All of our losses were by 10 points are less. I don't know that we'd be 4-0 but we haven't lost any games that we couldn't have won with Rondo playing.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 4   Go Up
« previous next »