Question:
What ratio of Talent to Money with a strict "player conduct code" would you need to sign a guy like Royce White, if, going into the deal, you all knew that regular season away games that were too far to drive were just going to be DNP's?
The "player conduct code" being "there is no way you can get caught doing anything other than watching the game and tweeting support about it while a game that you are not attending is going on."
Obvious example: Say you had a Lebron level player. You are Boston. 41 regular season games at home, plus games in NYC, Brooklyn, Philly are all easy drives, and C's have 6 away games there. Now we're up to 47 games, and i'm not even taking the time to look at schedule stretches like how C's are home March 30 vs chicago, then fly to chicago for @ bulls on 31st, then are @ wizards on April 2 then home Arpil 4 vs Philly. So very easy for a guy who can't fly to play March 30, drive to DC (not that long a drive) for the 2nd and back to Boston for the 4th. All told, let's conservatively say 50 games easy, plus most playoff games (off days for travel in playoffs, more spaced out in general).
So, considering Lebron on a decent team buys you about a 70% winning percentage, 0.7 x 50 = 35 wins at least with 32 games without that player. If you're a bit above .500 without this player, then say you go 18-14 the rest of the way, getting to 53 wins, comfortably in the playoffs, with this player likely to play >85% of playoff games if not all, depending on scheduling.
So what's he worth? If it's Lebron level, probably still close to the max.
But if it's a valuable, 10 million dollar "David West" level player, what, would you give 5 mil knowing you're going to greatly increase your chances of winning in ~60% of your games, if you knew all this ahead of time? I don't know. I think prior expectations would greatly change your appreciation of any outcome.