Do we know for sure the specifics of the offer the C's made? Do we know what was guaranteed? Do we know if there really was a true, no-trade clause?
Without knowing this from a very reputable source, I just find it hard to get on him for the comment about the contract.
And of course overall, I don't blame him one bit for leaving. The C's did not show any loyalty to him (nor should they have), so, he had no obligation to them. Good for him to go to a better team in a heck of a nicer city to spend the winter in.
http://espn.go.com/boston/nba/story/_/id/8552139/ray-allen-left-boston-celtics-no-trade-clause-tableThis is what I seriously dislike.
Why does Ray get all this special treatment? Cause we felt bad we were trying to trade him? That is HOW business works. I don't care if he left, just don't make excuses. Admit the truth! You hurt your brothers in arms, then expect to be welcomed by the Celtics when you retire? Keep dreamin', not everyone is as delusional as Ray.
So how come Pierce is always cut as the middle men? Never given a no trade clause, dangled in trades multiple times at his tenure with the C's before the Big 3 came. KG/Allen got to throw the first pitch for the C's. Both given no trade clauses, and contracts stretched out despite their old age.
All I want Ray to do is at LEAST be honest. If you respected the fans, and your 'brothers.' At least say, "I hated the organization for constantly trying to trade me. I don't like Rondo, he's a terrible leader, and can't control a locker room. And why am I being benched behind Bradley, a no name, who has yet to prove anything?"
"What about Manu Ginobli doing the same thing as you?"
Ray Allen shakes violently. "Next question."
The funny thing is after everything is all said and done. I guarantee Ray will admit the truth, but by then it'll be too late. And no one will care enough.