Author Topic: Celtics (38-35) at Wolves (26-46) 4/1  (Read 24692 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Celtics (38-35) at Wolves (26-46) 4/1
« Reply #105 on: April 01, 2013, 10:22:09 PM »

Offline Smutzy#9

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 703
  • Tommy Points: 42
3 of our best 5 out 1 of our main back ups out. Back to back on a road trip.

Cant expect much else im afraid. if you think about it. Doc has been using an 8 man rotation for the last few years. lets call it 9 this year. almost half our rotation players are out..........

Re: Celtics (38-35) at Wolves (26-46) 4/1
« Reply #106 on: April 01, 2013, 10:23:07 PM »

Offline blink

  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18676
  • Tommy Points: 1519
final foul count:
minn - 11
boston - 21

did anyone see the whole game?  11 fouls for the whole game?  something seems off.

Re: Celtics (38-35) at Wolves (26-46) 4/1
« Reply #107 on: April 01, 2013, 10:24:21 PM »

Offline JoT

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1126
  • Tommy Points: 84
If they don't want to play as the 8th seed they better start winning games because Milwaukee can take the 7th seed very easily.

Re: Celtics (38-35) at Wolves (26-46) 4/1
« Reply #108 on: April 01, 2013, 10:24:43 PM »

Offline hpantazo

  • Tommy Heinsohn
  • *************************
  • Posts: 25194
  • Tommy Points: 2742
final foul count:
minn - 11
boston - 21

did anyone see the whole game?  11 fouls for the whole game?  something seems off.

we went to the basket and didn't get calls

Re: Celtics (38-35) at Wolves (26-46) 4/1
« Reply #109 on: April 01, 2013, 10:25:59 PM »

Offline CelticsFan9

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1571
  • Tommy Points: 116
  • Everyone's excited for the new era.
If they don't want to play as the 8th seed they better start winning games because Milwaukee can take the 7th seed very easily.

I'd rather they be the 8th seed.

Re: Celtics (38-35) at Wolves (26-46) 4/1
« Reply #110 on: April 01, 2013, 10:26:27 PM »

Offline blink

  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18676
  • Tommy Points: 1519
final foul count:
minn - 11
boston - 21

did anyone see the whole game?  11 fouls for the whole game?  something seems off.

we went to the basket and didn't get calls

well from the time I started watching we were at least being aggressive driving to the hoop somewhat.  11 for the game just seems really low.

Re: Celtics (38-35) at Wolves (26-46) 4/1
« Reply #111 on: April 01, 2013, 10:27:07 PM »

Offline Lightskinsmurf

  • NCE
  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1949
  • Tommy Points: 134
If they don't want to play as the 8th seed they better start winning games because Milwaukee can take the 7th seed very easily.

Health is the number one and really only concern right now. We stand no chance if our guys aren't healthy regardless of seeding. We'll win a few more games before the season ends, relax.

Re: Celtics (38-35) at Wolves (26-46) 4/1
« Reply #112 on: April 01, 2013, 10:28:17 PM »

Offline Edgar

  • Kevin McHale
  • ************************
  • Posts: 24646
  • Tommy Points: 445
  • No contaban con mi astucia !!!
If they don't want to play as the 8th seed they better start winning games because Milwaukee can take the 7th seed very easily.

I'd rather they be the 8th seed.

me too
Once a CrotorNat always a CROTORNAT  2 times CB draft Champion 2009-2012

Nice to be back!

Re: Celtics (38-35) at Wolves (26-46) 4/1
« Reply #113 on: April 01, 2013, 10:33:18 PM »

Offline JoT

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1126
  • Tommy Points: 84
If they don't want to play as the 8th seed they better start winning games because Milwaukee can take the 7th seed very easily.

I'd rather they be the 8th seed.
I've gotten to the point where I just want this season to be over already and for them to just refresh next season.

Re: Celtics (38-35) at Wolves (26-46) 4/1
« Reply #114 on: April 01, 2013, 10:54:22 PM »

Offline rocknrollforyoursoul

  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9742
  • Tommy Points: 326
I know this has been discussed before, but why is Wilcox only playing 12 minutes?  I mean he started right?  Is he still having issues from heart surgery?  If he is in Doc's doghouse, why would he be starting?  I am lost.

Good question. I know he's been inconsistent lately, but tonight he had 4 pts and 6 boards in only 12 minutes—seems like he deserved to play a bit more.

And why did Green take only 10 shots?
"There are two kinds of people: those who say to God, 'Thy will be done,' and those to whom God says, 'All right, then, have it your way.'"

"You don't have a soul. You are a Soul. You have a body."

— C.S. Lewis

Re: Celtics (38-35) at Wolves (26-46) 4/1
« Reply #115 on: April 01, 2013, 11:11:57 PM »

Offline blink

  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18676
  • Tommy Points: 1519
I know this has been discussed before, but why is Wilcox only playing 12 minutes?  I mean he started right?  Is he still having issues from heart surgery?  If he is in Doc's doghouse, why would he be starting?  I am lost.

Good question. I know he's been inconsistent lately, but tonight he had 4 pts and 6 boards in only 12 minutes—seems like he deserved to play a bit more.

And why did Green take only 10 shots?

I was wondering about Green only having a few shots as well.  He has been on a tear lately, were the twolves doing some def schemes to hold him down?

I just don't know why wilcox would start, and then only get 12 min...it doesn't make any sense.

Re: Celtics (38-35) at Wolves (26-46) 4/1
« Reply #116 on: April 01, 2013, 11:15:30 PM »

Offline The Rondo Show

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2898
  • Tommy Points: 364
  • Hook 'Em
I know this has been discussed before, but why is Wilcox only playing 12 minutes?  I mean he started right?  Is he still having issues from heart surgery?  If he is in Doc's doghouse, why would he be starting?  I am lost.

Good question. I know he's been inconsistent lately, but tonight he had 4 pts and 6 boards in only 12 minutes—seems like he deserved to play a bit more.

And why did Green take only 10 shots?

I was wondering about Green only having a few shots as well.  He has been on a tear lately, were the twolves doing some def schemes to hold him down?

I just don't know why wilcox would start, and then only get 12 min...it doesn't make any sense.

Jeff Green seemed very passive and a little exhausted tonight IMO. When he took it to the rack he looked good though.
DKC Suns

Re: Celtics (38-35) at Wolves (26-46) 4/1
« Reply #117 on: April 01, 2013, 11:18:45 PM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30859
  • Tommy Points: 1327
I know this has been discussed before, but why is Wilcox only playing 12 minutes?  I mean he started right?  Is he still having issues from heart surgery?  If he is in Doc's doghouse, why would he be starting?  I am lost.

Good question. I know he's been inconsistent lately, but tonight he had 4 pts and 6 boards in only 12 minutes—seems like he deserved to play a bit more.

And why did Green take only 10 shots?

I was wondering about Green only having a few shots as well.  He has been on a tear lately, were the twolves doing some def schemes to hold him down?

I just don't know why wilcox would start, and then only get 12 min...it doesn't make any sense.
Pekovic was drawing fouls like crazy on him. Randolph was doing a bit better job with Pek so he ended up getting more minutes.

Re: Celtics (38-35) at Wolves (26-46) 4/1
« Reply #118 on: April 02, 2013, 12:01:44 AM »

Offline Smutzy#9

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 703
  • Tommy Points: 42
I know this has been discussed before, but why is Wilcox only playing 12 minutes?  I mean he started right?  Is he still having issues from heart surgery?  If he is in Doc's doghouse, why would he be starting?  I am lost.

Good question. I know he's been inconsistent lately, but tonight he had 4 pts and 6 boards in only 12 minutes—seems like he deserved to play a bit more.

And why did Green take only 10 shots?

AK 47 was also guarding him. He is a tough match up. Quick, long and a solid defender

Re: Celtics (38-35) at Wolves (26-46) 4/1
« Reply #119 on: April 02, 2013, 10:19:46 AM »

Offline kozlodoev

  • NCE
  • Kevin Garnett
  • *****************
  • Posts: 17914
  • Tommy Points: 1294
final foul count:
minn - 11
boston - 21

did anyone see the whole game?  11 fouls for the whole game?  something seems off.

we went to the basket and didn't get calls

well from the time I started watching we were at least being aggressive driving to the hoop somewhat.  11 for the game just seems really low.
The lack of calls was mind-boggling. But you gotta play through it.

Also, Doc seemed a bit off his game when it comes to working the officials (I didn't see too many camera cuts to the sidelines, so I assume this was the case -- CSN is usually pretty good zooming on Doc when he gives his patent incredulous look to the refs. :))

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."