When in doubt...blame the refs. That was the best game we played all playoffs and we still lost. Guess its easier to blame the refs than to accept we aren't as good as Miami
No, it is easier to blame the refs when an overtime game gets decided by bad calls. Anyone one of several bad calls goes a different way and the celtics win. It is as close to an objective observation as you can get.
Again... the Celtics have won countless games that other teams have blamed on officiating. I'm not going to sink to that poor sport level. What are you guys crying about? Bron going to the free throw line and Pierce fouling out? Yeah... we held Bron to 35% shooting. The dude is a freight train. Pierce is playing with a sprained MCL. Why is it so shocking that he'd get a lot of fouls on that beast? Some of those were blatant and obvious fouls. Guys tied him up before he even crossed half court. Get over it. There are bad calls and there are good calls. It goes both ways. You can't accept that the Celtics stormed back 24 points and beat the Lakers in 08 (in a game were were getting away with total murder) and then cry about us getting beaten in a close game against Miami in a series we are more than likely going to lose anyway.
Last night was the best game the Celtics have played all playoffs. Just a total best case scenario. The best the offense can possibly look given our current injury condition. Miami won. That's all. That was likely our 1 game to steal in this series and we just didn't have enough to get it done. Is what it is. That was a heck of an effort by Rondo and the Celtics last night.
Here is the box score from Game 4 of the 2008 NBA Finals:
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/boxscore?gid=2008061213You tell me where the discrepancy is, my man! The stats are just about equal. Boston had one more team foul called against them. Boston shot 4% better than the Lakers from the field. The Lakers shot one more FT against Boston. I believe the example you used was a straw man argument with no validity.
Celtic fans weren't complaining nearly this much after blowing an 18 point lead to Philly on the road in Game 4. I found this on espn.com from a post by NBA is More Rigged Than WWE:
Here are some stats I found:
FTA: Heat 47, Celtics 29 (LeBron with 24)
Shots at rim: Heat 26, Celtics 25
Fouls: Heat 18, Celtics 33
Players with 3+ Fouls: Heat 1, Celtics 5 (3 Fouled out, including leading scorer on the team)
3PA: Heat 26, Celtics 16
Rebounds: Heat 42, Celtics 42
Turnovers: Heat 8, Celtics 8
FG %: Heat: 44.6, Celtics 49.4
I'm not blaming the refs for Boston's loss, but you can't deny ( 33 fouls to 18) that they didn't have a major influence on the outcome. Do you think the game would have been called nearly as lopsided if the Celtics were playing anybody else?