Author Topic: Big 3 - What now?  (Read 5536 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Big 3 - What now?
« Reply #15 on: March 15, 2012, 03:27:00 PM »

Offline hpantazo

  • Tommy Heinsohn
  • *************************
  • Posts: 25355
  • Tommy Points: 2756
What now? We sit back and watch this team not get a lotto pick, but then lose in the first round.

So we don't get the impact player we need in a loaded draft AND we don't get another title run.

Good stuff by Danny Ainge.

Dianny did a great job imo. If teams are trying to get our all-stars, including Rondo, for 10 cents on the dollar he should tell them to shove it. We still get a ton of cap space this summer and 2 first round picks, we are fine. No need to kill our cap space or or team for mediocre players and/or 2nd round picks

Re: Big 3 - What now?
« Reply #16 on: March 15, 2012, 03:27:18 PM »

Offline droopdog7

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7022
  • Tommy Points: 468
Or we are just realistic.

Cynical =/= realistic.

Seriously, people are acting like there was some magical trade out there that would have made us instant contenders. There probably wasn't.

Trades just for the sake of trades don't help anyone.


LOL getting a legit center isn't just making a trade for the sake of making a trade.

Personally, I think either way there was no chance they would be a contender which I why they should have blown it up on March 1st. But since they decided against that they needed to trade for a Center. Period.

Now we are stuck in the middle. Without a lotto pick and with a early playoff loss extremely likely. Getting a center would have helped their chances if they are going to try to make a run. Just stupid that they didn't.
Yeah seriously, what legit center deal are you talking about. 

Re: Big 3 - What now?
« Reply #17 on: March 15, 2012, 03:29:43 PM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
What now? We sit back and watch this team not get a lotto pick, but then lose in the first round.

So we don't get the impact player we need in a loaded draft AND we don't get another title run.

Good stuff by Danny Ainge.

Dianny did a great job imo. If teams are trying to get our all-stars, including Rondo, for 10 cents on the dollar he should tell them to shove it. We still get a ton of cap space this summer and 2 first round picks, we are fine. No need to kill our cap space or or team for mediocre players and/or 2nd round picks
Here's the other issue, you only have so many minutes to develop players with in the NBA.

Having three low first round picks in a single year isn't all that great. You're not getting elite talent and you probably can't play all three guys, If the C's didn't already have two picks I imagine moving Ray Allen for one would look a lot more attractive to DA.

Re: Big 3 - What now?
« Reply #18 on: March 15, 2012, 03:31:56 PM »

Offline LarBrd33

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21238
  • Tommy Points: 2016
Kaman could have been had ... probably for a 2nd rounder.

We're basically putting all of our hope this season on landing him... on the off chance that the Hornets will buy him out (despite the fact they say they will not) and that Kaman will pick Boston.

Putting all of our hopes on Kaman is like when Ainge put all of our hopes in Shaq last year.

This is a disgrace.  I'll tune in for our playoff beating, but I can't see watching them trot out the same hapless squad down the stretch.

Re: Big 3 - What now?
« Reply #19 on: March 15, 2012, 03:33:12 PM »

Offline wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34116
  • Tommy Points: 1612
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
Kaman could have been had ... probably for a 2nd rounder.

We're basically putting all of our hope this season on landing him... on the off chance that the Hornets will buy him out (despite the fact they say they will not) and that Kaman will pick Boston.

Putting all of our hopes on Kaman is like when Ainge put all of our hopes in Shaq last year.

This is a disgrace.  I'll tune in for our playoff beating, but I can't see watching them trot out the same hapless squad down the stretch.


A 2nd and not money coming back perhaps.  The Celtics didn't have cap space to pull off such a deal.


And if he was so cheap, why didn't another team make that trade?  Probably because it was an untrue rumor.

Re: Big 3 - What now?
« Reply #20 on: March 15, 2012, 03:33:35 PM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
Kaman could have been had ... probably for a 2nd rounder.
Depends on who you believe, there were Boston media reports that Kaman's contract was too large for the C's to get in a two team trade without sending more than our random expiring players. A third team would have had to absorb players to make the roster spots/salaries work.

Re: Big 3 - What now?
« Reply #21 on: March 15, 2012, 03:34:09 PM »

Offline hpantazo

  • Tommy Heinsohn
  • *************************
  • Posts: 25355
  • Tommy Points: 2756
Kaman could have been had ... probably for a 2nd rounder.

We're basically putting all of our hope this season on landing him... on the off chance that the Hornets will buy him out (despite the fact they say they will not) and that Kaman will pick Boston.

Putting all of our hopes on Kaman is like when Ainge put all of our hopes in Shaq last year.

This is a disgrace.  I'll tune in for our playoff beating, but I can't see watching them trot out the same hapless squad down the stretch.

everything I've read says we would have had to trade one of the big 3 in a deal for Kaman to make salaries work, despite what the trade checker says. That's not worth it imo.

Re: Big 3 - What now?
« Reply #22 on: March 15, 2012, 03:37:06 PM »

Offline LarBrd33

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21238
  • Tommy Points: 2016
Kaman could have been had ... probably for a 2nd rounder.
Depends on who you believe, there were Boston media reports that Kaman's contract was too large for the C's to get in a two team trade without sending more than our random expiring players. A third team would have had to absorb players to make the roster spots/salaries work.
It's simple math...  Kaman makes 14 mil (expiring).  JO makes 6.2, Bass makes 4.2, Wilcox makes 3, Dooling makes 2.2 ... You can take back 150% of the salary you send out.

6.2 (jo) + 3 (Wilcox) + 2.2 = 11.4 ... X 150% = 17.1  

What am I missing?  You include those 3 bums + a 2nd rounder ... or Johnson (another 1 mil) or a late first and get Kaman in here for our final run.

Standing pat is a disgrace.

Re: Big 3 - What now?
« Reply #23 on: March 15, 2012, 03:42:33 PM »

Offline LooseCannon

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11833
  • Tommy Points: 950
You can take back 150% of the salary you send out.

As a tax-paying team, the Celtics can only take back 125$ plus 100K.
"The worst thing that ever happened in sports was sports radio, and the internet is sports radio on steroids with lower IQs.” -- Brian Burke, former Toronto Maple Leafs senior adviser, at the 2013 MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference

Re: Big 3 - What now?
« Reply #24 on: March 15, 2012, 03:43:35 PM »

Offline Reyquila

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1046
  • Tommy Points: 141
  • Let them hate, as long as they fear
The Big Three will not be traded: they will just fade away, like McArthur did.
 :-[
And someday in the midst of time,
When they ask you if you knew me
Remember that you were a friend of mine

Re: Big 3 - What now?
« Reply #25 on: March 15, 2012, 03:44:54 PM »

Offline hpantazo

  • Tommy Heinsohn
  • *************************
  • Posts: 25355
  • Tommy Points: 2756
Kaman could have been had ... probably for a 2nd rounder.
Depends on who you believe, there were Boston media reports that Kaman's contract was too large for the C's to get in a two team trade without sending more than our random expiring players. A third team would have had to absorb players to make the roster spots/salaries work.
It's simple math...  Kaman makes 14 mil (expiring).  JO makes 6.2, Bass makes 4.2, Wilcox makes 3, Dooling makes 2.2 ... You can take back 150% of the salary you send out.

6.2 (jo) + 3 (Wilcox) + 2.2 = 11.4 ... X 150% = 17.1  

What am I missing?  You include those 3 bums + a 2nd rounder ... or Johnson (another 1 mil) or a late first and get Kaman in here for our final run.

Standing pat is a disgrace.

all reports say otherwise, There are pre-existing trade clauses that make that deal impossible, It would have meant trading one of the big 3.

Re: Big 3 - What now?
« Reply #26 on: March 15, 2012, 03:47:59 PM »

Offline boscel33

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2861
  • Tommy Points: 173
What does a legit C cost?  Hill cost a 1st rounder. 
The cost would be long term money like Okafor's eating up the C's cap for the next few years.

Lot of people taking cap room for next year.  What are the legit players that we can get with that cap room?  Are they > than what we could have dealt for this year?
"There's sharks and minnows in this world. If you don't know which you are, you ain't a shark."

Re: Big 3 - What now?
« Reply #27 on: March 15, 2012, 03:50:47 PM »

Offline LarBrd33

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21238
  • Tommy Points: 2016
You can take back 150% of the salary you send out.

As a tax-paying team, the Celtics can only take back 125$ plus 100K.
11.4 x 1.25 = 14.25 ... Still works.

ANyhow... whatever.  I'll get over it.  Just would have been nice to at least be mildly competitive in the first round.   This team has reached no-mans land.  Is what it is.  Stinks accepting that your team isn't relevant anymore. It was a fun 3.5 year run.

Re: Big 3 - What now?
« Reply #28 on: March 15, 2012, 03:53:58 PM »

Offline wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34116
  • Tommy Points: 1612
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
You can take back 150% of the salary you send out.

As a tax-paying team, the Celtics can only take back 125$ plus 100K.
11.4 x 1.25 = 14.25 ... Still works.

ANyhow... whatever.  I'll get over it.  Just would have been nice to at least be mildly competitive in the first round.   This team has reached no-mans land.  Is what it is.  Stinks accepting that your team isn't relevant anymore. It was a fun 3.5 year run.


No.  No-mans land is when you have no cap space with a bunch of overpayed roll players.


Celtics have Rondo and the flexibility to build a new team from the ground around him.  What that have to have is patience and not just blow all the flexibility on the first shiny thing that is put under their noses (like Detroit did)

Re: Big 3 - What now?
« Reply #29 on: March 15, 2012, 04:00:59 PM »

Offline elcotte

  • Al Horford
  • Posts: 438
  • Tommy Points: 52
Kaman could have been had ... probably for a 2nd rounder.
Depends on who you believe, there were Boston media reports that Kaman's contract was too large for the C's to get in a two team trade without sending more than our random expiring players. A third team would have had to absorb players to make the roster spots/salaries work.
It's simple math...  Kaman makes 14 mil (expiring).  JO makes 6.2, Bass makes 4.2, Wilcox makes 3, Dooling makes 2.2 ... You can take back 150% of the salary you send out.

6.2 (jo) + 3 (Wilcox) + 2.2 = 11.4 ... X 150% = 17.1  

What am I missing?  You include those 3 bums + a 2nd rounder ... or Johnson (another 1 mil) or a late first and get Kaman in here for our final run.


Standing pat is a disgrace.

That's what so many miss around here...it's more than simple math. It's what you get and what you give.