Some people might disagree, but Doc is to blame in one sense....if he puts Rondo in there with 4 very old players and Rondo runs down the court and looks back to see one guy pulling up lame and three others trying with all their might to push their walkers down the court and suddenly Rondo gets passive, then that is definitely Doc's fault. And if Doc has told him not to attack the rim without help because he can't shoot free throws....well then a lot of people are at fault
You know I agree with you, but for some reason, when Pierce was playing pg without Rondo, it seemed like the Celts could easily get out on the break.
I addressed this when you said this a week or two ago, but the Celtics had their PPG in transition cut in half when Pierce ran the offense in Rondo's absence.
The C's didn't run much without Rondo and would have been last in the league had they done that for the whole season.
Thanks for the numbers Faf...it was just an observation...didnt have proof.
That being said, I guess I just liked the tempo and pace better.
Rondo was great at dictating the pace last night, but much of the season, I have seen him crawling up the floor and I thought it was just because his lineup was old. Then I saw Pierce running the show and noticed we were getting good shots earlier in the shot clock with a simplified offense.
I still see Rondo taking too much time to initiate offense and maybe that is Doc's fault. Plays that are designed to get Ray open are taking too much time to develop and if he doesnt get open (more frequent lately) the offense grinds to a halt unless Rondo can make a play.
Something I had not considered was that Ray was missing for alot of the games Pierce was playing point forward too...