What is most telling to me after 1/8 the season is this trend:
2007-2008: 9-1 finished: 66-16
2008-2009: 8-2 finished: 62-20
2009-2010: 8-2 finished: 50-32
2010-2011: 8-2 finished: 56-26
2011-2012: 4-4
The team has had good starts the past four years that helped keep their record floating later in the season when their performance slumped. 4 years in a row.
This year, their starting record is poor enough that they will need to improve their performance later on in the year to boost their record for the playoffs. The exact opposite situation.
Maybe it's a case of these players having 'caught the rabbit' and not really caring until playoffs time. But if that's the case, we'd have to question why it wasn't the case last year, and the year before that, and before that.
In the seasons prior, did they not have a training camp and many more preseason games? Yea, okay.
I think the meaning behind what I was saying has been lost. I'll copy a reply I made earlier to a similar comment.
"No, they [didn't]. It's not to suggest that there aren't reasons they haven't started out as well. Some poster earlier went on an on about the reasons the Celtics aren't doing well.
The reasons persist. Having a reason for doing poorly is not a substitute for doing well."
At the end of the day, the situation exists that the team's record needs to be compensated in the other direction than it has been in the past four years.
They need to do *better* later in the season whereas they have consistently done *worse*.