Let's not act like Boston and Miami are the only 2 teams you can possibly win with.
Saying you will take less money to play on a winning team doesn't mean you go out and just the team favored to win it all next year.
While Miami and Boston would work, so does the Knicks. Amare and Turiaf, neither of which are true centers, are like their only big men (or am I missing someone?). Especially if Nene has a good relationship with Carmelo and Billups then the Knicks make even more sense. Knicks are a team ready to win now (of course I hope they don’t) and Nene could really help them make the move to legit contender.
San Antonio would make sense too. Who else do they really have down low besides Duncan and McDyess? They both can use fewer minutes with another big in the rotation, and Blair, although tough, doesn’t have the size for center. San Antonio probably makes as much sense as Boston does to non-biased observers.
But even if he would sign with Boston, would you really want him? If he signs the mid-level (or new CBA equivalent if there is one), it’s not going to be for one year. So I would think signing him would eliminate any chance of us getting Howard (as opposed to Miami who I figure has no chance of getting Howard). You don’t sign major free agents to max year deals (this assumes Nene would sign for the max years possible) then ship them out after one year, unless it just isn’t a good fit. What’s the dream scenario here? Sign Nene, win a championship next year, then trade him away and sign Howard, and win several more championships? You really think that would happen?