Rondo is definately overrated on this board. I mean there have been a number of threads in which people on this board wouldn't trade him straight up for people like Deron Williams. I mean come on, seriously.
Rondo is a good PG, but he isn't an elite PG and never will be. I can say that definitively because Rondo hasn't improved his shooting since he has been in the league. He is an awful shooter (worst foul shooting of his career by far this year). His FG% is pretty good because he is excellent at taking the ball to the hole and finishing around the rim, but he is a liability in many respects offensively because he can be left open (including the and 1 situations on the drives). He is a good defender, but even that is greatly exaggerated on this board.
He isn't a top five PG, and is a borderline top 10 PG right now (I mean if you are building a team for the future you would take Rondo over Nash, but Nash is still better then him, just as an example). Good but not great, and he greatly benefits from his teammates. Put him an awful team and his deficiencies would be magnified and would play a much larger role in how he is viewed.
Simple question, if Rondo and Conley switched teams, who is better?