anyone still think that Perk is as good/almost as good as Kristic offensively?
I love the hustle he is giving on the offensive boards . He can hit shots from just about anywhere on the floor 18 feet and in. He also uses up fakes effectively to get the foul and the hoop.
He is going to be an awesome weapon to use off the bench when Shaq gets back.
First paragraph in the OP...read it:
First things first, let me say that Nenad Krstic's offense has been very good. For a guy who hasn't learned the system yet, he's played very well. I don't think anybody can criticize him much for what he's done on the offensive end of the floor, and that includes his offensive rebounding, which has been a very pleasant surprise.
This thread is about his weak defensive rebounding and his defense in general.
I read it , but then later in the thread Roy and a few others were pulling up shooting % and other stats to show that you can make a case for Perk being just as effective offensive player as Kristic .
Kristic is so much better than Perk offensively, I realize Perk is a much better defender.
