Can someone tell me why Ainge thought it was a good idea, in the first place, to trade Eddie House for Nate? I think Eddie's dead-eye shooting is a much more valuable commodity, than a streaky undersized 2.
You do realize that without Nate Robinson, we likely don't get past the Magic last year and even have a chance at the title? Just sayin. I know he's had a rough year but calling the whole acquisition in to question is harsh.
