Perk and Nate for Okur? Awful...
One of the biggest complaints on the board is lack of rebounding, and lack of true centers to bang inside and provide post presence. You want to trade on of the best defensive centers in the league, great rebounder, and a key piece to our championship contending starting 5 for a Center ho hardly steps foot inside the 3 point line? Plus throw in our best guard off the bench? I dont see how this makes any logic whatsoever.
I think you're thinking of last year's complaints. With Shaq on board, KG rejuvenated, Paul putting in work and, hopefully, Jermaine chipping in, rebounding is not much of problem at all thus far, and that's with Perk contributing nothing and two poor rebounders in Baby and Semih seeing a combined 40 minutes per game. And it's not like Okur is a terrible rebounder. He is a level below Perk on the boards but a head above the likes of Sheed, Baby and Semih
While it's true that Perk will bang inside, he is nowhere near a post presence. With Shaq on board, Perk's minutes as a banger are mostly filled.
And, I probably should have mentioned this in the OP, but Okur is a surprisingly good post defender, even measuring out better than Perk (and just behind Dwight Howard) in one-on-one post defense opportunities. (
http://www.thedreamshake.com/2010/5/11/1468295/why-retain-chuck-hayes-a)
Of 200+ post-up chances, opponents scored 36.1% of the against Okur, compared to 35.8% for Howard, 36.2% for Perk, 37.4% for Al Horford, 39.4% for Duncan and 46.2% for the similarly framed Marc Gasol. He also forced turnovers in 15.5% of those opportunities, a mark much higher than Perk 10.2%. Arguably, Okur was the slightly better post defender than Perk last year.