Indiana Pacers:
PG: Derek Fisher
SG: Kobe Bryant
SF: Mickael Pietrus
PF: Tyrus Thomas
C: Marc Gasol
Bench:
PG: Jonny Flynn
Wing: Kyle Korver
Big: Nenad Krstic
Wow, I like this squad a lot: Solid veteran PG with a nice apprentice, superstar scoring SG, lock-down SF with a shooter off the bench and a nice complimentary front court with length.
In my eyes, at least a Conference championship team.
How do these Lakers Pacers compare to the pre-Gasol Lakers in your eyes? What about post-Gasol?
You mean
Pacers, Roy.

Well, in my eyes:
Post-gasol: I'll do this first since it's freshest. I'd say slightly inferior. I mean the 1,2 are the same. Pietrus could be argued to be a little worse than Artest(?), but I had them both in the same boat of SFs I was intent on getting (along with Battier, Ariza) with no particular preference of the 4. Marc Gasol I'd rather have over Bynum because of Bynum's injuries and Gasol is a far superior passer. He still gives you the same scoring, length, rebounding, and shot blocking that Bynum does. Thomas is a significant downgrade over Pau. No question about that. Defensively, I think they are even maybe I'd even prefer Thomas. Offensively, Pau is a huge upgrade.
As for the bench. I think Flynn is a considerably better pg than Farmar. Korver is better than any wing the Lakers had. Krstic is a slight downgrade from Odom. And I haven't finished filling out the bench yet.
So, I say for my starting lineup I'm really only losing a good chunk at my starting PF spot, while my bench as a whole is slightly better.
Pre-Gasol: Well in 2006-07, Bynum was averaging 8 points, 6 rebs per game. Luke Walton was their starting SF? Radmanovic was their starting PF? I'd say my team is vastly superior to that squad. Vastly. Their bench was Odom, Smush Parker, Kwame, Vujacic, Turiaf. With my current bench and still more picks to come, I'd say with confidence that my starters and bench are both considerably better than those 42-40 LA Lakers in every aspect.