Author Topic: Press Conference Schedule is Up! 2010 Celticsblog Draft: Draft Board  (Read 782555 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: 2010 Celticsblog Draft: Draft Board (Looking for two GMs)
« Reply #690 on: August 17, 2010, 07:53:38 PM »

Offline Gomesfan

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2251
  • Tommy Points: 102
DO I have the 23rd pick tomorrow?
L.A. Clippers
Derrick Rose Blake Griffin 4.11 5.3 5.15 6.11 7.15 8.11 9.15 10.11 11.15 12.11 13.15

Re: 2010 Celticsblog Draft: Draft Board (Looking for two GMs)
« Reply #691 on: August 17, 2010, 07:55:51 PM »

Online Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 62459
  • Tommy Points: -25481
  • Bo Knows: Joe Don't Know Diddley
DO I have the 23rd pick tomorrow?

Looks like it, yep.


I'M THE SILVERBACK GORILLA IN THIS MOTHER——— AND DON'T NONE OF YA'LL EVER FORGET IT!@ 34 minutes

Re: 2010 Celticsblog Draft: Draft Board (Looking for two GMs)
« Reply #692 on: August 17, 2010, 08:00:03 PM »

Offline Rondo2287

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13009
  • Tommy Points: 816
Looking to move up from 3.19 willing to exchange 4th rounders and more.  (4.12)
CB Draft LA Lakers: Lamarcus Aldridge, Carmelo Anthony,Jrue Holiday, Wes Matthews  6.11, 7.16, 8.14, 8.15, 9.16, 11.5, 11.16

Re: 2010 Celticsblog Draft: Draft Board (Looking for two GMs)
« Reply #693 on: August 17, 2010, 08:08:24 PM »

Offline JSD

  • NCE
  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12590
  • Tommy Points: 2159
DO I have the 23rd pick tomorrow?

You do. Are you thinking about moving up to 3.5? PM me

Re: 2010 Celticsblog Draft: Draft Board (Looking for two GMs)
« Reply #694 on: August 17, 2010, 08:17:49 PM »

Offline wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34114
  • Tommy Points: 1612
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
DO I have the 23rd pick tomorrow?

You do. Are you thinking about moving up to 3.5? PM me

Or if you want a slightly better pick, PM me with the 3.4.

 ;D

Re: 2010 Celticsblog Draft: Draft Board (Looking for two GMs)
« Reply #695 on: August 17, 2010, 08:27:21 PM »

Offline JSD

  • NCE
  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12590
  • Tommy Points: 2159
I'm looking to move down with the 3rd round 5th pick! I'm the fairest, most honest negotiator in this league! TP's are almost guaranteed! Send me an offer! Please don't wait!  :) :) :)

Re: 2010 Celticsblog Draft: Draft Board (Looking for two GMs)
« Reply #696 on: August 17, 2010, 08:29:12 PM »

Offline celticpride07

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1236
  • Tommy Points: 222
The Lakers have will entertain offers for stephen curry or zach randolph
Pick 2 Heat: 
Pg: Jennings/Vasquez
Sg: Wade/R. Allen/Rivers
SF: Lebron/M. Williams
PF: Bosh/Humphries
C: B. Lopez/Dalembert/Anthony

Re: 2010 Celticsblog Draft: Draft Board (Looking for two GMs)
« Reply #697 on: August 17, 2010, 08:55:22 PM »

Offline Rondo2287

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13009
  • Tommy Points: 816
looking to move up from 3.19 and move down from 4.12
CB Draft LA Lakers: Lamarcus Aldridge, Carmelo Anthony,Jrue Holiday, Wes Matthews  6.11, 7.16, 8.14, 8.15, 9.16, 11.5, 11.16

Re: 2010 Celticsblog Draft: Draft Board (Looking for two GMs)
« Reply #698 on: August 17, 2010, 08:56:24 PM »

Offline JSD

  • NCE
  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12590
  • Tommy Points: 2159
looking to move up from 3.19 and move down from 4.12

I have a great offer for you!  ;D Get at me!

Re: 2010 Celticsblog Draft: Draft Board (Looking for two GMs)
« Reply #699 on: August 17, 2010, 09:07:24 PM »

Offline Gomesfan

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2251
  • Tommy Points: 102
Why do I have the 23rd pick two days in a row?
L.A. Clippers
Derrick Rose Blake Griffin 4.11 5.3 5.15 6.11 7.15 8.11 9.15 10.11 11.15 12.11 13.15

Re: 2010 Celticsblog Draft: Draft Board (Looking for two GMs)
« Reply #700 on: August 17, 2010, 09:10:45 PM »

Online Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 62459
  • Tommy Points: -25481
  • Bo Knows: Joe Don't Know Diddley
Why do I have the 23rd pick two days in a row?

We did a "modified" snake draft this year.  Teams that pick at the top of the first round pick at the bottom of the second and third rounds, and back to the top at the fourth round.

The reasoning is that since the teams with the top picks have historically placed higher in the voting, we'd do something to cancel out that inherent advantage a bit.


I'M THE SILVERBACK GORILLA IN THIS MOTHER——— AND DON'T NONE OF YA'LL EVER FORGET IT!@ 34 minutes

Re: 2010 Celticsblog Draft: Draft Board (Looking for two GMs)
« Reply #701 on: August 17, 2010, 09:12:35 PM »

Offline Gomesfan

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2251
  • Tommy Points: 102
Why do I have the 23rd pick two days in a row?

We did a "modified" snake draft this year.  Teams that pick at the top of the first round pick at the bottom of the second and third rounds, and back to the top at the fourth round.

The reasoning is that since the teams with the top picks have historically placed higher in the voting, we'd do something to cancel out that inherent advantage a bit.
Thay what I assumed, I remember voting I think?
L.A. Clippers
Derrick Rose Blake Griffin 4.11 5.3 5.15 6.11 7.15 8.11 9.15 10.11 11.15 12.11 13.15

Re: 2010 Celticsblog Draft: Draft Board (Looking for two GMs)
« Reply #702 on: August 17, 2010, 09:15:40 PM »

Offline JSD

  • NCE
  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12590
  • Tommy Points: 2159
Why do I have the 23rd pick two days in a row?

We did a "modified" snake draft this year.  Teams that pick at the top of the first round pick at the bottom of the second and third rounds, and back to the top at the fourth round.

The reasoning is that since the teams with the top picks have historically placed higher in the voting, we'd do something to cancel out that inherent advantage a bit.

I haven't chimed in on this so I want to now:

I understand the idea behind it but feel it screws those falling out of the top 5 to about the 12 or 13th pick... Like me. Only the top 5 should have been penalized, just one mans opinion anyway.

Re: 2010 Celticsblog Draft: Draft Board (Looking for two GMs)
« Reply #703 on: August 17, 2010, 09:20:45 PM »

Offline indeedproceed

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 42585
  • Tommy Points: 2756
  • You ain't the boss of the freakin' bedclothes.
Why do I have the 23rd pick two days in a row?

We did a "modified" snake draft this year.  Teams that pick at the top of the first round pick at the bottom of the second and third rounds, and back to the top at the fourth round.

The reasoning is that since the teams with the top picks have historically placed higher in the voting, we'd do something to cancel out that inherent advantage a bit.

I haven't chimed in on this so I want to now:

I understand the idea behind it but feel it screws those falling out of the top 5 to about the 12 or 13th pick... Like me. Only the top 5 should have been penalized, just one mans opinion anyway.

I thought you had the 10th overall pick?

Sure the top 5 get an advantage...but honestly I don't think the penalty is that great. Its kind of like everyone picks 1-15 made 1 bad trade, to varying degrees. In the third round I said to pick #30 guy "Hey, lets switch picks the rest of the draft!"...and he agreed because he moved up in the third.

It is a "punishment", but you picking 10th, only lose 10 spots (I think?)...9 loses 12, 8 loses 14, 7 loses 16, and so on....I think its completely appropriate.

"You've gotta respect a 15-percent 3-point shooter. A guy
like that is always lethal." - Evan 'The God' Turner

Re: 2010 Celticsblog Draft: Draft Board (Looking for two GMs)
« Reply #704 on: August 17, 2010, 09:22:07 PM »

Online Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 62459
  • Tommy Points: -25481
  • Bo Knows: Joe Don't Know Diddley
Why do I have the 23rd pick two days in a row?

We did a "modified" snake draft this year.  Teams that pick at the top of the first round pick at the bottom of the second and third rounds, and back to the top at the fourth round.

The reasoning is that since the teams with the top picks have historically placed higher in the voting, we'd do something to cancel out that inherent advantage a bit.

I haven't chimed in on this so I want to now:

I understand the idea behind it but feel it screws those falling out of the top 5 to about the 12 or 13th pick... Like me. Only the top 5 should have been penalized, just one mans opinion anyway.

There were some fairly elite guys who dropped as far as #20 this year.  I mean, Amare was 2nd team All-NBA, and despite his reputation, his team went deep into the playoffs.

It's really the final ten that have the roughest disadvantage, and they're the ones this modified snake benefits most.


I'M THE SILVERBACK GORILLA IN THIS MOTHER——— AND DON'T NONE OF YA'LL EVER FORGET IT!@ 34 minutes