« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8   Go Down

Author Topic: C's sign Von Wafer  (Read 24688 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: C's sign Von Wafer
« Reply #90 on: July 30, 2010, 05:14:50 AM »

Offline LilRip

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6987
  • Tommy Points: 411
he's got talent but apparently, he's also got an attitude problem. reminds me of JR Smith. come to think of it, he's probably a poor man's JR Smith. I'd still look forward to a Rudy signing and getting Shaq though, if possible.



- LilRip
Logged
- LilRip
Re: C's sign Von Wafer
« Reply #91 on: July 30, 2010, 05:33:43 AM »

Offline Celtics4ever

  • NCE
  • Johnny Most
  • ********************
  • Posts: 20148
  • Tommy Points: 1335
Von Wafer the rise of Taj.  Who is going to be Taj is the best question.

I think this means Rudy may not come here also probably nixes Eddie coming back (and I just read he signed with the HEAT)
« Last Edit: July 30, 2010, 05:53:40 AM by Celtics4ever »
Logged
Re: C's sign Von Wafer
« Reply #92 on: July 30, 2010, 08:04:32 AM »

Offline Tr1boy

  • Paul Pierce
  • ***************************
  • Posts: 27260
  • Tommy Points: 867
Not sure about the signing. Even wanting to bring in Fernandez. We are full imo in the back end.

Why not give bradley a chance?
Logged
Re: C's sign Von Wafer
« Reply #93 on: July 30, 2010, 08:07:44 AM »

Offline moiso

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7682
  • Tommy Points: 447
Quote from: KG_ended_Bias on July 30, 2010, 05:06:20 AM
I can honestly say this now! All the people who despises Gerald Green, Green would have actually been a better signing for us. Gerald does everything better than Wafer and is 3 inches taller. What is Danny thinking??? Wafer has a attitude problem, he thinks he is better than he is, and is selfish offensively and defensively and plays when he wants to. I absolutely hate this Signing UGHHHH! If Danny wanted potential locker room cancers we coulda just signed back Delonte or took a High Reward flyer on Rashad McCants.
Yep, McCants is another one who I don't like but would prefer to Wafer.
Logged
Re: C's sign Von Wafer
« Reply #94 on: July 30, 2010, 08:26:28 AM »

Offline StartOrien

  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12961
  • Tommy Points: 1200
If we could combine this with Rudy it'd be huge. Ideally,this should really allow us to limit Paul and Ray's minutes during the regular season. 
Logged
Re: C's sign Von Wafer
« Reply #95 on: July 30, 2010, 09:55:28 AM »

Offline WeMadeIt17

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3397
  • Tommy Points: 435
A lot of people dont seem to like this deal. I like it a lot. Could be a great spark off the bench, and is youth that can run out with Nate and Rondo. We need that. With his shooting along with nates. Then you can have Marquis strickly being a slasher. We could have a very nice bench. Still need a big.. Shaq anyone??
Logged
Re: C's sign Von Wafer
« Reply #96 on: July 30, 2010, 10:20:41 AM »

Offline misha

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2898
  • Tommy Points: 1488
  • Open your eyes
Logged
The Immortals:

Iker Casillas, Giacinto Facchetti, Alessandro Nesta, Matthias Sammer, Javier Zanetti, Lothar Matthäus (c), Xavi, Zico, Maradona, Roberto Baggio, Ferenc Puskas, Karl Heinz Rummenigge

Coach:Rinus Michels
Re: C's sign Von Wafer
« Reply #97 on: July 30, 2010, 10:38:57 AM »

Offline Evantime34

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11942
  • Tommy Points: 764
  • Eagerly Awaiting the Next Fantasy Draft
After reading through this entire thread here are my thoughts.
1. Von Wafer can shoot and is athletic, both good attributes for the bench.
2. Him paired with Nate will give us two good shooters and two fast players that can get out and run in the back court.
3. I believe that his stint in Greece followed by a ten day contract has humbled him.
4. If last year didn't humble him, the vets on this team will.
5. I think his better attitude and playing for this team will lead him to become a decent defender or never see the court.
6. This is a good signing IF we bring in another wing player or Bradley is ready to give us good bench minutes at the 2.
7. I am giving this signing an incomplete grade until I see what else happens. If we still do the Rudy trade this becomes a great move because we aren't relying on Von, the same can be said if we sign another decent wing. If we're relying on Von it makes me real nervous.
Logged
DKC:  Rockets
CB Draft: Memphis Grizz
Players: Klay Thompson, Jabari Parker, Aaron Gordon
Next 3 picks: 4.14, 4.15, 4.19
Re: C's sign Von Wafer
« Reply #98 on: July 30, 2010, 10:53:46 AM »

Offline Roy Hobbs

  • In The Rafters
  • The Natural
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33333
  • Tommy Points: 6430
  • Doc could learn a thing or two from Norman Dale
I think this is an okay depth signing (to fill the Finley role, for instance), but I don't like the idea of Marquis and Wafer being our two primary backup wings. 

Facing reality, it's very likely that Marquis will miss extended playing time this season; he's just a very fragile player.  Who becomes our backup SF in that instance?  6'5" Von Wafer?  Ray Allen, playing 40 minutes per game?  Luke Harangody, who isn't all that athletic for a PF, let alone a SF?  None is a terribly appealing option.

I see Wafer more as roster filler; we still need to address the first wing off the bench, in my opinion.
Logged

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

Portland CrotoNats:  2009 CB Draft Champions
Re: C's sign Von Wafer
« Reply #99 on: July 30, 2010, 10:55:34 AM »

Offline pearljammer10

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13129
  • Tommy Points: 885
I like it a lot but I would still like to see a trade for Rudy and use a trio of Rudy/Daniels/Wafer at the 2-3. This gives us some pretty good depth.
Logged
Re: C's sign Von Wafer
« Reply #100 on: July 30, 2010, 12:26:09 PM »

Offline Assassin70

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 814
  • Tommy Points: 164
Quote from: Evantime34 on July 30, 2010, 10:38:57 AM
After reading through this entire thread here are my thoughts.
1. Von Wafer can shoot and is athletic, both good attributes for the bench.
2. Him paired with Nate will give us two good shooters and two fast players that can get out and run in the back court.
3. I believe that his stint in Greece followed by a ten day contract has humbled him.
4. If last year didn't humble him, the vets on this team will.
5. I think his better attitude and playing for this team will lead him to become a decent defender or never see the court.
6. This is a good signing IF we bring in another wing player or Bradley is ready to give us good bench minutes at the 2.
7. I am giving this signing an incomplete grade until I see what else happens. If we still do the Rudy trade this becomes a great move because we aren't relying on Von, the same can be said if we sign another decent wing. If we're relying on Von it makes me real nervous.

100% agree with this co sign
Logged
"The only correct actions are those that demand no explanation and no apology."

Red Auerbach
Re: C's sign Von Wafer
« Reply #101 on: July 30, 2010, 01:30:26 PM »

Offline Jonny CC

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 960
  • Tommy Points: 76
My guess is that Von was plan B once they couldn't come to an agreement on a Rudy deal.  Hopefully they focus on getting another big now.  Personally, as entertaining as Shaq would be, I would rather have Kwame. 
Logged
Before a game on Christmas against the Pacers, Bird told Chuck Person that he had a present for him. During the game, Bird shot a 3-pointer in front of Person. Immediately after releasing the ball, Bird said to Person, "Merry F!#*ing Christmas!" and then the shot went in.
Re: C's sign Von Wafer
« Reply #102 on: July 30, 2010, 01:44:59 PM »

Offline kozlodoev

  • NCE
  • Kevin Garnett
  • *****************
  • Posts: 17914
  • Tommy Points: 1294
Quote from: Roy Hobbs on July 30, 2010, 10:53:46 AM
I think this is an okay depth signing (to fill the Finley role, for instance), but I don't like the idea of Marquis and Wafer being our two primary backup wings. 

Facing reality, it's very likely that Marquis will miss extended playing time this season; he's just a very fragile player.  Who becomes our backup SF in that instance?  6'5" Von Wafer?  Ray Allen, playing 40 minutes per game?  Luke Harangody, who isn't all that athletic for a PF, let alone a SF?  None is a terribly appealing option.

I see Wafer more as roster filler; we still need to address the first wing off the bench, in my opinion.
This is absolutely a valid concern. The problem is there aren't too many perimeter player with legitimate size and defensive capabilities out there. Rudy Fernandez is certainly not addressing this need.

The first wing off the bench will likely be Daniels. The perspective of acquiring anyone who's better fit for this role is bleak. The question is who's the third-string wing player/injury insurance, and it is increasingly likely that this position will be filled by Sims or Gaffney, unfortunately.
Logged
"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
Re: C's sign Von Wafer
« Reply #103 on: July 30, 2010, 02:22:24 PM »

Offline LooseCannon

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11833
  • Tommy Points: 950
Quote from: Evantime34 on July 30, 2010, 10:38:57 AM
3. I believe that his stint in Greece followed by a ten day contract has humbled him.
4. If last year didn't humble him, the vets on this team will.

A lot of people don't believe this.

I think Doc should play Von Wafer a decent bit for the first few games, then reduce his minutes drastically to see how he reacts.  If Wafer can't handle that, then he doesn't belong on the Celtics.
Logged
"The worst thing that ever happened in sports was sports radio, and the internet is sports radio on steroids with lower IQs.” -- Brian Burke, former Toronto Maple Leafs senior adviser, at the 2013 MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference
Re: C's sign Von Wafer
« Reply #104 on: July 30, 2010, 02:22:50 PM »

Offline footey

  • JoJo White
  • ****************
  • Posts: 16039
  • Tommy Points: 1837
Quote from: Edgar on July 29, 2010, 06:18:21 PM
Interesting...

Rondo   Nate   Avery
Ray     Wafer or Marquis
Pierce ....XXXXXX Big Hole
KG      BBD    Harangody
JOneal  xxx another hole, Perk


That means no Rudy+
No delonte.. :?

I dont know...

Have not seen him play, but let me ask: Could Harangody back up Pierce at the 3? He seems like the right size. Does he lack the footwork?
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8   Go Up
« previous next »