« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: Idea: Craig Smith  (Read 5542 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Idea: Craig Smith
« Reply #15 on: June 28, 2010, 05:24:58 PM »

Offline StartOrien

  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12961
  • Tommy Points: 1200
Quote from: wdleehi on June 28, 2010, 05:16:12 PM
Quote from: StartOrien on June 28, 2010, 05:13:03 PM
Quote from: Birdbrain on June 28, 2010, 04:55:08 PM
The BBD getting blocked party is back again. (never understood the point) Craig Smith is 1/2 as talented as BBD.  BBD was sadly better than KG towards the end of the year... if you were actually paying attention.


Last seasons stats:

Glen Davis: 17.3 mpg, 6.3ppg, 3.8 rbg, .6 apg .4 stl, .3 bpg, .437 fg%, .696 ft%

Craig Smith: 16.4 mpg, 7.8 ppg, 3.8 rbg, 1.2 apg, .4 stl, .3bpg, .569 fg%, .635 ft%


Perfect example of why the Celtics do not need Smith unless Davis is traded. 

Again though, if he can be had for under 3 a season I think you take the risk on repeat talent over acquiring length for the point of adding length.

There's guys I'd prefer way over Craig Smith at the wing or Haywood at center, but I think you take Smith's talent if you can get it for a decent price.
Logged
Re: Idea: Craig Smith
« Reply #16 on: June 28, 2010, 06:04:50 PM »

Offline wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34114
  • Tommy Points: 1612
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
Quote from: StartOrien on June 28, 2010, 05:24:58 PM
Quote from: wdleehi on June 28, 2010, 05:16:12 PM
Quote from: StartOrien on June 28, 2010, 05:13:03 PM
Quote from: Birdbrain on June 28, 2010, 04:55:08 PM
The BBD getting blocked party is back again. (never understood the point) Craig Smith is 1/2 as talented as BBD.  BBD was sadly better than KG towards the end of the year... if you were actually paying attention.


Last seasons stats:

Glen Davis: 17.3 mpg, 6.3ppg, 3.8 rbg, .6 apg .4 stl, .3 bpg, .437 fg%, .696 ft%

Craig Smith: 16.4 mpg, 7.8 ppg, 3.8 rbg, 1.2 apg, .4 stl, .3bpg, .569 fg%, .635 ft%


Perfect example of why the Celtics do not need Smith unless Davis is traded. 

Again though, if he can be had for under 3 a season I think you take the risk on repeat talent over acquiring length for the point of adding length.

There's guys I'd prefer way over Craig Smith at the wing or Haywood at center, but I think you take Smith's talent if you can get it for a decent price.

At the min?  yes.

At part of the MLE?  No.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »