Author Topic: Bleacher Report - Joey Crawford and Ed Rush Defeat Boston Celtics in Game Five  (Read 5770 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline rjsuperfly66

  • Josh Minott
  • Posts: 116
  • Tommy Points: 1
Interesting Article:

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/397573-2010-nba-playoffs-joey-crawford-and-ed-rush-defeat-celtics-in-game-five

Here is the article:

Let’s talk hypothetically for a moment.

If you were an NBA official and wanted to make sure the Orlando Magic won last night, what would be some things you might try to do?

A few quickly come to mind.

Get the Celtics into early foul trouble.

In particular, get the Celtics big men into early foul trouble.

If the big men are in foul trouble, they can’t be physical with Dwight Howard.

Also, with Rajon Rondo being the catalyst for the Celtics offense, and Boston having no real back-up, the officials would want to get him in foul trouble as well.

Now, how would you accomplish this?

It isn’t as if the officials can just make an Orlando player take the ball to the hoop against one of these players.

No, what you would do is call ticky-tack, non-shooting, off-the-ball fouls. It can get teams in the penalty quickly. It can get the players you want to focus on in foul trouble quickly. A perfect combination.

Unfortunately, if you are a Celtics fan, what I just described was not a hypothetical, but it was the nightmare of what happened in last night’s Orlando Magic Game Five win.

Last night’s game will take its place right along side Lakers-Kings Game Six from 2002 as exhibits A and B in the Tim Donaghy-taught class of How NBA Officials Impact a Game.

Think I am crazy?

Think this is just sour grapes?

First, if you watched with a neutral eye and are being honest, I find no way that you can dismiss the obvious impact the officials had on the game last night.

But second, I have actually brought facts to support what I am writing.

For the game, Boston was called for 30 fouls to just 24 for the Magic.

Okay, not a major discrepancy.

But, Boston was called for 22 non-shooting fouls, to just 14 for Orlando.

And far more important, is when those calls were made and on whom.

In the first eight minutes of the game, Kevin Garnett was called for two non-shooting fouls, Rajon Rondo two, and Kendrick Perkins one.

At the 4:26 mark of the quarter, the Celtics were already in the penalty, Garnett was on the bench, and Rondo remained on the floor but could not be as aggressive because of his two fouls.

By the end of the quarter, Glen Davis, who came in for Garnett, had two non-shooting fouls called on him. For the quarter, Boston was called for eight fouls, all non-shooting.

On to the second quarter, with both Davis and Garnett on the bench in foul trouble, the officials went to work on the other big men of the Celtics.

It would not take long.

Within the first five minutes of the second quarter, Rasheed Wallace was called for three fouls, two of which were non-shooting.  Mike Breen said repeatedly last night that the officials were calling a tight game.

He was half-right.

The officials put their whistles away for long stretches last night when the Celtics had the ball, allowing the Magic to make their runs uninterrupted.

Between the end of the first quarter and middle of the second, Orlando went nearly seven minutes without one foul being called.

Not coincidentally, it was during this stretch where the Magic seized control of the game, turning a two-point lead into a 12-point advantage.

For anyone who might say the game was just being called tight, and that was the reason for all the non-shooting fouls, how can you explain Dwight Howard not picking up his second foul of the game until there were just two minutes left in the fourth quarter?

Howard is one of the most aggressive and foul-prone players in the league. No chance if the game is being called fairly, and it is being called tight, he emerges with only one foul in the first 46 minutes.

Okay, so the officials have put the Celtics in the penalty early in quarters, got Rondo, Garnett, Davis, and Wallace in foul trouble, and kept the whistle in their pockets when the Magic were on defense.

Mission accomplished?

The answer would be no, as Rush and Crawford then took things too far.

Enter Kendrick Perkins.

The officials tagged him with three non-shooting fouls in the first half with two coming within 40 seconds of each other. By now, also, we know they also hit him with two technical fouls.

If last night was a mid-week game in February, there would be a strong argument that neither one should have been called a technical.

But in the Eastern Conference Finals, under absolutely no circumstances can an official call those technical fouls on him. To be fair, the first technical was a double-tech, where both Perkins and Marcin Gortat were called for technical fouls (Gortat's was also an underserving technical).

About a minute after the first call, with 36 seconds left in the half, Perkins is called for his third non-shooting foul.

He reacts. But he also, turns away, and starts to walk in the complete opposite direction from the official.  He does what he should do.

That does not matter. The official T’s him up anyway. The official for both calls: Ed F. Rush.

Here is what Bill Simmons tweeted about the calls:

“Wow. I am ashamed to be an NBA fan. Tossing Perkins was an absolute travesty. I'm speechless. 1 of the most indefensible ref moments ever.”

“Perk's 2 techs: first one was a farce, 2nd one for WALKING AWAY from a ref after a terrible call. Donaghy just signed another book deal.”

Simmons was hardly the only one to voice such complaints.

After the game, Jeff Clark from celticsblog.com, someone who is known for almost never complaining about the officials, wrote, “I hate that the refs made themselves the story tonight.”

The second half was not much better.

After the officials made a terrible charge call on Rondo (replays clearly showed Jameer Nelson’s feet were not set), Rondo walked to the sideline and tried to talk to the official about the call.

Replays also clearly showed Rondo was not in any way talking to Joey Crawford.

That doesn’t stop Crawford, who you can see instigating the situation by yelling at Rondo to get to the bench.

Why can’t Rondo talk to an official?

Well, if you are Joey Crawford, and want the Magic to win, you come up with a reason.

You would think Crawford’s phantom, made-up call against Marcus Camby from early in these playoffs would be enough to get him out of the playoffs. Or, his suspension a few years back for giving a technical to Tim Duncan while Duncan sat laughing on the bench.  At the very least, the man might be the slightest bit humbled or shamed into doing a better job.

Not Crawford.  He instigated the situation and then callled the technical foul on Rondo.

Somehow, despite the officials, despite the good play of the Magic (they very well could have won without the officials' help), the Celtics were hanging around, trailing by just nine after three quarters.

Don’t worry.

For good measure, the officials called the Celtics for five fouls in the first four minutes of the fourth quarter, guaranteeing that Boston could not play aggressive defense the rest of the way, because if they did, any little touch, would send the Magic to the free throw line.

For the game, Garnett, Rondo, Perkins, and Davis were in foul trouble throughout. None of them committed a foul on a Magic player shooting the basketball.  Also add in Rasheed Wallace who fouled out with four non-shooting fouls.

And yes, Rashard Lewis and Vince Carter were also in foul trouble for the Magic. But, that is what these NBA officials do. They try to balance things out once they get what they wanted.

As for Lewis and Carter, the officials were probably doing the Magic a favor by giving Stan Van Gundy an excuse to bench the two players.

Now the NBA has what it wants—playoff games on the weekend.

I fully expect to see a well-officiated game on Friday night. Well, at least an evenly officiated game (it could be equally poor both ways).

I will close with this comment that was sent to me last night. It was posted on an Orlando Magic Fan Site, by an Orlando Magic fan: “This is the worst kind of win I'd have hoped for and will unfortunately be remembered as one of those asteriks [sic] games predetermined by NBA, like the 2002 Kings-Lakers. Homerism aside, both T's on Perkins were an utter joke, as well as early ticky tacky fouls on some other Celtics fouls...”

The comment went on about Dwight Howard and his dirty play.

I’ll save that complaint for another time.

Offline LarBrd33

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21238
  • Tommy Points: 2016
great article... interesting to note:

Quote
"On April 15, 2007, Crawford ejected San Antonio Spurs superstar Tim Duncan for supposedly laughing at Crawford from his seat on the bench during a game against the Dallas Mavericks. Duncan also supposedly insulted Crawford with an expletive.[7] Duncan alleges that Crawford asked if he wanted to fight.[8] On April 17, Crawford was suspended for the remainder of the 2006-07 season and the 2007 Playoffs as a result of this altercation, ending his 21 consecutive Finals appearances."
 
"Crawford met with league officials on July 30 to discuss his future in the NBA but no resolution was reached.[9] On September 17, 2007, the NBA announced Crawford's reinstatement. Commissioner Stern met with Crawford and stated, "Based on my meeting with Joey Crawford, his commitment to an ongoing counseling program and a favorable professional evaluation that was performed at my direction, I am satisfied that Joey understands the standards of game management and professionalism the NBA expects from him and that he will be able to conduct himself in accordance with those standards."[10]"

The link to the youtube clip of that play is in the article.  In other words... Crawford is a company man and does what Stern wants.  NBA needed a Magic victory last night.

Offline LarBrd33

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21238
  • Tommy Points: 2016
I know it's a conspiracy theory, but really it does make some sense and there seems to be a long history of it.  Celtics basically "won" the series by going up 3-0, but the NBA needed to extend it.   I want to get angry about it... but I fully expect Dwight Howard to get in early foul trouble in game 6 and I fully expect KG and Perk to get away with murder... so I can't be too upset.

Offline Bankshot

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7540
  • Tommy Points: 632
I know it's a conspiracy theory, but really it does make some sense and there seems to be a long history of it.  Celtics basically "won" the series by going up 3-0, but the NBA needed to extend it.   I want to get angry about it... but I fully expect Dwight Howard to get in early foul trouble in game 6 and I fully expect KG and Perk to get away with murder... so I can't be too upset.

And what if that doesn't happen?  Would you be upset then?
"If somebody would have told you when he was playing with the Knicks that Nate Robinson was going to change a big time game and he was going to do it mostly because of his defense, somebody would have got slapped."  Mark Jackson

Offline liam

  • NCE
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 45928
  • Tommy Points: 3341
TP

This is spot on.

Offline LB3533

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4088
  • Tommy Points: 315
We will know for certain if the refs are rigging the game just based on what happens in Game 6.

If the Magic are favored by the refs in Game 6, then the NBA is rigged.

Why?

Because everyone is assuming the Celtics will be getting all the calls in Game 6, but the refs will want to prove those people wrong & continue to make favorable calls for the Magic which may result in a Game 6 victory for the Magic.


Offline LarBrd33

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21238
  • Tommy Points: 2016
I know it's a conspiracy theory, but really it does make some sense and there seems to be a long history of it.  Celtics basically "won" the series by going up 3-0, but the NBA needed to extend it.   I want to get angry about it... but I fully expect Dwight Howard to get in early foul trouble in game 6 and I fully expect KG and Perk to get away with murder... so I can't be too upset.

And what if that doesn't happen?  Would you be upset then?
If that doesn't happen, we lose the series...

but it will

None of this is surprising me. 

Offline Thruthelookingglass

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2687
  • Tommy Points: 133
All our indignation and dismay over the abysmal officiating last night is for naught if we just accept it.  But the question is what do we do?

I know it's hard to stop supporting the Celtics.  But unless we are willing to do more than gripe then the bad (or biased) officiating will not be addressed. 

We need to give the League a reason to knock it off, but I confess I don't know what the answer is.

Offline liam

  • NCE
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 45928
  • Tommy Points: 3341
All our indignation and dismay over the abysmal officiating last night is for naught if we just accept it.  But the question is what do we do?

I know it's hard to stop supporting the Celtics.  But unless we are willing to do more than gripe then the bad (or biased) officiating will not be addressed. 

We need to give the League a reason to knock it off, but I confess I don't know what the answer is.

Boycott?

Offline MaxwellSmart86

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 918
  • Tommy Points: 144
Interesting Article:

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/397573-2010-nba-playoffs-joey-crawford-and-ed-rush-defeat-celtics-in-game-five

Here is the article:

Let’s talk hypothetically for a moment.

If you were an NBA official and wanted to make sure the Orlando Magic won last night, what would be some things you might try to do?

A few quickly come to mind.

Get the Celtics into early foul trouble.

In particular, get the Celtics big men into early foul trouble.

If the big men are in foul trouble, they can’t be physical with Dwight Howard.

Also, with Rajon Rondo being the catalyst for the Celtics offense, and Boston having no real back-up, the officials would want to get him in foul trouble as well.

Now, how would you accomplish this?

It isn’t as if the officials can just make an Orlando player take the ball to the hoop against one of these players.

No, what you would do is call ticky-tack, non-shooting, off-the-ball fouls. It can get teams in the penalty quickly. It can get the players you want to focus on in foul trouble quickly. A perfect combination.

Unfortunately, if you are a Celtics fan, what I just described was not a hypothetical, but it was the nightmare of what happened in last night’s Orlando Magic Game Five win.

Last night’s game will take its place right along side Lakers-Kings Game Six from 2002 as exhibits A and B in the Tim Donaghy-taught class of How NBA Officials Impact a Game.

Think I am crazy?

Think this is just sour grapes?

First, if you watched with a neutral eye and are being honest, I find no way that you can dismiss the obvious impact the officials had on the game last night.

But second, I have actually brought facts to support what I am writing.

For the game, Boston was called for 30 fouls to just 24 for the Magic.

Okay, not a major discrepancy.

But, Boston was called for 22 non-shooting fouls, to just 14 for Orlando.

And far more important, is when those calls were made and on whom.

In the first eight minutes of the game, Kevin Garnett was called for two non-shooting fouls, Rajon Rondo two, and Kendrick Perkins one.

At the 4:26 mark of the quarter, the Celtics were already in the penalty, Garnett was on the bench, and Rondo remained on the floor but could not be as aggressive because of his two fouls.

By the end of the quarter, Glen Davis, who came in for Garnett, had two non-shooting fouls called on him. For the quarter, Boston was called for eight fouls, all non-shooting.

On to the second quarter, with both Davis and Garnett on the bench in foul trouble, the officials went to work on the other big men of the Celtics.

It would not take long.

Within the first five minutes of the second quarter, Rasheed Wallace was called for three fouls, two of which were non-shooting.  Mike Breen said repeatedly last night that the officials were calling a tight game.

He was half-right.

The officials put their whistles away for long stretches last night when the Celtics had the ball, allowing the Magic to make their runs uninterrupted.

Between the end of the first quarter and middle of the second, Orlando went nearly seven minutes without one foul being called.

Not coincidentally, it was during this stretch where the Magic seized control of the game, turning a two-point lead into a 12-point advantage.

For anyone who might say the game was just being called tight, and that was the reason for all the non-shooting fouls, how can you explain Dwight Howard not picking up his second foul of the game until there were just two minutes left in the fourth quarter?

Howard is one of the most aggressive and foul-prone players in the league. No chance if the game is being called fairly, and it is being called tight, he emerges with only one foul in the first 46 minutes.

Okay, so the officials have put the Celtics in the penalty early in quarters, got Rondo, Garnett, Davis, and Wallace in foul trouble, and kept the whistle in their pockets when the Magic were on defense.

Mission accomplished?

The answer would be no, as Rush and Crawford then took things too far.

Enter Kendrick Perkins.

The officials tagged him with three non-shooting fouls in the first half with two coming within 40 seconds of each other. By now, also, we know they also hit him with two technical fouls.

If last night was a mid-week game in February, there would be a strong argument that neither one should have been called a technical.

But in the Eastern Conference Finals, under absolutely no circumstances can an official call those technical fouls on him. To be fair, the first technical was a double-tech, where both Perkins and Marcin Gortat were called for technical fouls (Gortat's was also an underserving technical).

About a minute after the first call, with 36 seconds left in the half, Perkins is called for his third non-shooting foul.

He reacts. But he also, turns away, and starts to walk in the complete opposite direction from the official.  He does what he should do.

That does not matter. The official T’s him up anyway. The official for both calls: Ed F. Rush.

Here is what Bill Simmons tweeted about the calls:

“Wow. I am ashamed to be an NBA fan. Tossing Perkins was an absolute travesty. I'm speechless. 1 of the most indefensible ref moments ever.”

“Perk's 2 techs: first one was a farce, 2nd one for WALKING AWAY from a ref after a terrible call. Donaghy just signed another book deal.”

Simmons was hardly the only one to voice such complaints.

After the game, Jeff Clark from celticsblog.com, someone who is known for almost never complaining about the officials, wrote, “I hate that the refs made themselves the story tonight.”

The second half was not much better.

After the officials made a terrible charge call on Rondo (replays clearly showed Jameer Nelson’s feet were not set), Rondo walked to the sideline and tried to talk to the official about the call.

Replays also clearly showed Rondo was not in any way talking to Joey Crawford.

That doesn’t stop Crawford, who you can see instigating the situation by yelling at Rondo to get to the bench.

Why can’t Rondo talk to an official?

Well, if you are Joey Crawford, and want the Magic to win, you come up with a reason.

You would think Crawford’s phantom, made-up call against Marcus Camby from early in these playoffs would be enough to get him out of the playoffs. Or, his suspension a few years back for giving a technical to Tim Duncan while Duncan sat laughing on the bench.  At the very least, the man might be the slightest bit humbled or shamed into doing a better job.

Not Crawford.  He instigated the situation and then callled the technical foul on Rondo.

Somehow, despite the officials, despite the good play of the Magic (they very well could have won without the officials' help), the Celtics were hanging around, trailing by just nine after three quarters.

Don’t worry.

For good measure, the officials called the Celtics for five fouls in the first four minutes of the fourth quarter, guaranteeing that Boston could not play aggressive defense the rest of the way, because if they did, any little touch, would send the Magic to the free throw line.

For the game, Garnett, Rondo, Perkins, and Davis were in foul trouble throughout. None of them committed a foul on a Magic player shooting the basketball.  Also add in Rasheed Wallace who fouled out with four non-shooting fouls.

And yes, Rashard Lewis and Vince Carter were also in foul trouble for the Magic. But, that is what these NBA officials do. They try to balance things out once they get what they wanted.

As for Lewis and Carter, the officials were probably doing the Magic a favor by giving Stan Van Gundy an excuse to bench the two players.

Now the NBA has what it wants—playoff games on the weekend.

I fully expect to see a well-officiated game on Friday night. Well, at least an evenly officiated game (it could be equally poor both ways).

I will close with this comment that was sent to me last night. It was posted on an Orlando Magic Fan Site, by an Orlando Magic fan: “This is the worst kind of win I'd have hoped for and will unfortunately be remembered as one of those asteriks [sic] games predetermined by NBA, like the 2002 Kings-Lakers. Homerism aside, both T's on Perkins were an utter joke, as well as early ticky tacky fouls on some other Celtics fouls...”

The comment went on about Dwight Howard and his dirty play.

I’ll save that complaint for another time.


WOW....this is Right on the money---it is EXACTLY what I was seeing while it was happening (go back to the game thread to see my posts "CHEATING")...it was SO obvious that the refs were trying to take away our advantage DEFENSIVELY---by calling CHEAP Ticky-tack Fouls on us to start this game (particularly KG's 2nd and Rondo's 2nd)....In time, Tim Donaghy will be proven CORRECT---just like Jose Canseco--who everyone piled on, when he first made HIS allegations.

BOTH are American HEROES in my book--!!
« Last Edit: May 27, 2010, 08:50:48 PM by MaxwellSmart86 »

Offline get_banners

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1848
  • Tommy Points: 100
All our indignation and dismay over the abysmal officiating last night is for naught if we just accept it.  But the question is what do we do?

I know it's hard to stop supporting the Celtics.  But unless we are willing to do more than gripe then the bad (or biased) officiating will not be addressed. 

We need to give the League a reason to knock it off, but I confess I don't know what the answer is.

grassroots protest. seriously. i mean, there's an easy way to connect with nba fans (not just celtics fans), many of whom are undoubtedly angry about the state of refereeing and the nba. seriously, how many of our teams have been screwed royally in important games? almost all. use the SBnation thing to organize something with fans from every team to protest the lack of transparency and judiciousness in nba refereeing. get people from every blog to flood nba emails, write opinion pieces, contact sports writers and complain, raise hell. this isn't just about us getting screwed in game 5. this is about basically every team getting screwed at some point or the other by flat-out bad officiating, which at worst is due to the league's interest in extending series to make money. this nonsense is bad for all nba fans. i'd start with sbnation and see where that gets us. again, its not a celtics thing. its a league thing. make it the fans against stern.

Offline Tradetime

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 605
  • Tommy Points: 115
Matt Barnes shoving KG out of bounds while he's making a play on the ball, Dwight Howard taking off Pierce's head in an earlier game in the series, then grabbing him and taking him down by his arm after a drive last night, causing another overextension of his right arm. The refs letting them get away with all of this.

This is so blatantly obvious as a tactic by the league to extend this series that it is beyond a joke.

If this is how Stern wants to play it, then we'd better get some home cooking tomorrow night.

Offline YouGotRondo d

  • Anfernee Simons
  • Posts: 313
  • Tommy Points: 26
The interesting thing is if the officials (under directive from the League office) can swing a game here or there, whos to say they couldn't swing a series?

Wouldn't Celtics/Lakers be entirely more profitable than Magic/Suns or Lakers/Magic? Is it totally out of the question to propose that the league may put the teams it wants in the finals, or even...gulp...decide the ultimate winner??
Scary thought.

Personally, I don't think the extent of this control is so drastic, (after all, we would have seen LeBron v. Kobe last year). My feeling is that for television revenue purposes they are extending the series for more cash. Plus, if you have Celts and Lakers theres no point in deciding a winner, it will be exciting either way. I just hope the league isn't forcing its hand to create this desired series.

As an additional point, I would also add without any factual evidence that the other major sports seem to put such a premium on the judiciousness of their "officals". I would use the example of Ed Hochuli in that Chargers/Broncos game a few years back. Baseball umps don't have it any easier. How is basketball the only sport not under a microscope?

Offline greg683x

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4225
  • Tommy Points: 593
They cant determine the winner of a series, I dont think they care who wins.  They want money.  They want series that go 6 and 7 games, so they get more TV time, more endorsement money, etc.  

If this was all about predetermining who wins, you really think the league was rooting for the Magic to beat the Cavs last year?

To be honest, with the way this series started with Orlando, I think the league just got fed up.   In the 2nd round of the playoffs there was 3 sweeps, and the Cavs/Celtics series which went 6 but wasnt even that competative.  The Lakers go up 2-0 easily, the Celtics go up 3-0 easily, I think the league just said 'enough.'  Whats funny is down here, before the Suns won their first game, they were talking on a sports radio station here in DC about how uneventful the NBA playoffs have been this year.

Someone said earlier, they'll know the fix is in if Orlando gets all the favorable calls tomorrow bc the refs will go against the belief they'll do a 'make up' game for the Celtics.  I think thats wrong.  What you'll see Friday night, and also Sunday if it makes it that far, is as well officiated a game as possible.  The league got what they wanted at this point, 6 game series, everyones tuning in to see if the Magic can make history.  They got what they want, they'll leave it to the players now.  Either way, it makes me feel stupid in strangest  way for following this sport, if this is actually going on.  If it really is, I just hope it comes out one day when I still care.



Greg

Offline twinbree

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2670
  • Tommy Points: 170
They cant determine the winner of a series, I dont think they care who wins.  They want money.  They want series that go 6 and 7 games, so they get more TV time, more endorsement money, etc.  

If this was all about predetermining who wins, you really think the league was rooting for the Magic to beat the Cavs last year?

To be honest, with the way this series started with Orlando, I think the league just got fed up.   In the 2nd round of the playoffs there was 3 sweeps, and the Cavs/Celtics series which went 6 but wasnt even that competative.  The Lakers go up 2-0 easily, the Celtics go up 3-0 easily, I think the league just said 'enough.'  Whats funny is down here, before the Suns won their first game, they were talking on a sports radio station here in DC about how uneventful the NBA playoffs have been this year.

Someone said earlier, they'll know the fix is in if Orlando gets all the favorable calls tomorrow bc the refs will go against the belief they'll do a 'make up' game for the Celtics.  I think thats wrong.  What you'll see Friday night, and also Sunday if it makes it that far, is as well officiated a game as possible.  The league got what they wanted at this point, 6 game series, everyones tuning in to see if the Magic can make history.  They got what they want, they'll leave it to the players now.  Either way, it makes me feel stupid in strangest  way for following this sport, if this is actually going on.  If it really is, I just hope it comes out one day when I still care.





What makes this sad is that we were actually the ones generous enough to their bottom-line by not only being the only 2nd round team to not get swept but also giving the public a drama-filled series. You'd think that would have counted for something if they really are shadily trying to force additional games. TP for the article OP. It's an interesting read.
Tommy: He's got a line about me. Tell him the line.

Mike: Everybody 60 or over knows Tommy as a player. Everybody 40 or over knows Tommy as a coach. Everybody 20 or over knows Tommy as a broadcaster. And everybody 10 or under thinks he's Shrek.