Author Topic: Celtics (41-23) at Cavs (51-15) 3/14  (Read 118969 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Celtics (41-23) at Cavs (51-15) 3/14
« Reply #315 on: March 14, 2010, 05:27:10 PM »

Offline mjammz54

  • Lonnie Walker IV
  • Posts: 57
  • Tommy Points: 3
can someone answer me this, when this year has Rasheed made a 3 pointer that has acutally meant something or in a big game close and late? Because I honestly cannot remember one.

Re: Celtics (41-23) at Cavs (51-15) 3/14
« Reply #316 on: March 14, 2010, 05:27:13 PM »

Offline Meadowlark_Scal

  • NCE
  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8193
  • Tommy Points: 670
  • You say when......
Boxing out is soooo easy, and it makes your life easier...heck, you don't even have to jump when you box out..!

Re: Celtics (41-23) at Cavs (51-15) 3/14
« Reply #317 on: March 14, 2010, 05:27:24 PM »

Offline Greenbean

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3739
  • Tommy Points: 418
KG is the only one who feels like rebounding today and he is in foul trouble

Re: Celtics (41-23) at Cavs (51-15) 3/14
« Reply #318 on: March 14, 2010, 05:27:24 PM »

Offline Bahku

  • CB HOF Editor
  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19771
  • Tommy Points: 3632
  • Oe ma krr pamtseotu
NO Defense ... Sheed and Perk just standing around, not boxing out. Wake the heck up, Bigs!!
2010 PAPOUG, 2012 & 2017 PAPTYG CHAMP, HD BOT

* BAHKU MUSIC *

Re: Celtics (41-23) at Cavs (51-15) 3/14
« Reply #319 on: March 14, 2010, 05:27:40 PM »

Offline xmuscularghandix

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7620
  • Tommy Points: 280
Wow Sheed, can you be more open and still miss?

The three pointers are getting into his head. It's like when Ortiz couldn't get a hit to save his life... at this point it's mental.

Re: Celtics (41-23) at Cavs (51-15) 3/14
« Reply #320 on: March 14, 2010, 05:27:43 PM »

Offline vinnie

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8654
  • Tommy Points: 429
The last two minutes perfectly summed up this season and this team. Fight hard to tie the game, then commit two stupid turnovers and have Perk miss two straight free throws.  Cavs now up 6. Yep, that is the season in a nutshell.

Re: Celtics (41-23) at Cavs (51-15) 3/14
« Reply #321 on: March 14, 2010, 05:27:45 PM »

Offline FallGuy

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1941
  • Tommy Points: 70
Just a maddening team to watch at times.

Lets go guys! We are going to win if we just stop turning it over!!!!!

And giving up offensive boards

Wow, big shock Varejao gets another offensive board! shocking, didn't see that one coming

So painful to watch.

Varejao = Athletic Big.

Athletic Big = Celtic Killer.

Re: Celtics (41-23) at Cavs (51-15) 3/14
« Reply #322 on: March 14, 2010, 05:27:58 PM »

Offline hpantazo

  • Tommy Heinsohn
  • *************************
  • Posts: 25355
  • Tommy Points: 2756
Looks like Ray and Rondo are doing everything for this team.

Atleast that's what the boxscores suggest.

the box score don't lie

Re: Celtics (41-23) at Cavs (51-15) 3/14
« Reply #323 on: March 14, 2010, 05:28:19 PM »

Offline mahonedog88

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2194
  • Tommy Points: 119
Those back to back plays where there was a mix-up on the pick and roll and where the pass was going has made this team completely out of synch all of a sudden...finally work back to tie it only to see it start to slip away again by making stupid mistakes on the offensive end

Re: Celtics (41-23) at Cavs (51-15) 3/14
« Reply #324 on: March 14, 2010, 05:28:39 PM »

Online snively

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5884
  • Tommy Points: 458
I missed most of the first half. Did the C's go to Perkins in the post against Hickson?

If so, was it successful?

He sealed Hickson pretty good for a few interior looks right off the pass but he missed most of them.
2016 CelticsBlog Draft: Chicago Bulls

Head Coach: Fred Hoiberg

Starters: Rubio, Danny Green, Durant, Markieff Morris, Capela
Bench: Sessions, Shumpert, G. Green, T. Booker, Frye
Deep Bench: CJ Watson, H. Thompson, P. Zipser, Papagiannis, Mejri

Re: Celtics (41-23) at Cavs (51-15) 3/14
« Reply #325 on: March 14, 2010, 05:28:56 PM »

Offline Greenbean

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3739
  • Tommy Points: 418
Just a maddening team to watch at times.

Lets go guys! We are going to win if we just stop turning it over!!!!!

And giving up offensive boards

Wow, big shock Varejao gets another offensive board! shocking, didn't see that one coming

So painful to watch.

Varejao = Athletic Big.

Athletic Big = Celtic Killer.

I wouldnt call him athletic. Just a hustle big. We are not hustling too much these days.

Re: Celtics (41-23) at Cavs (51-15) 3/14
« Reply #326 on: March 14, 2010, 05:29:30 PM »

Offline Spicoli

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1174
  • Tommy Points: 130
Those two turnovers were absolutely brutal. Ray hit the corner 3 and we had the momentum. All we needed were two good possessions, to blow the game open, but they messed it up anyway. ::)

Re: Celtics (41-23) at Cavs (51-15) 3/14
« Reply #327 on: March 14, 2010, 05:29:53 PM »

Offline Bahku

  • CB HOF Editor
  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19771
  • Tommy Points: 3632
  • Oe ma krr pamtseotu
Just a maddening team to watch at times.

Lets go guys! We are going to win if we just stop turning it over!!!!!

And giving up offensive boards

Wow, big shock Varejao gets another offensive board! shocking, didn't see that one coming

So painful to watch.

Varejao = Athletic Big.

Athletic Big = Celtic Killer.

I wouldnt call him athletic. Just a hustle big. We are not hustling too much these days.

Exactly ... it's our poor play that's making him look good. Getting out-hustled.
2010 PAPOUG, 2012 & 2017 PAPTYG CHAMP, HD BOT

* BAHKU MUSIC *

Re: Celtics (41-23) at Cavs (51-15) 3/14
« Reply #328 on: March 14, 2010, 05:29:57 PM »

Offline mjammz54

  • Lonnie Walker IV
  • Posts: 57
  • Tommy Points: 3
Powe>Big Baby

Re: Celtics (41-23) at Cavs (51-15) 3/14
« Reply #329 on: March 14, 2010, 05:30:16 PM »

Offline Rida

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 765
  • Tommy Points: 86
Im becoming s broken record, but rebounding is so [dang] simple, why cant we do it?