You're basing this prediction on a gut feeling after a tough loss...I think it would be better to get through the first round, and see who we face before we declare us lost in the second.
Why is it that we base our feelings on how the Celtics will do in the future on one game. Seriously!!???
Had the Celtics won last night without Paul Pierce, the same
people would be talking championship. The fact of the matter is, that when Ray Allen stole the pass with 48 some odd seconds on the clock, Boston could have conceivably scored and gone into the half with a 13 point lead. Instead, up by 10, they squandered a possession on a questionable, foul called on the double pick. Cleveland scored, Boston didn't
and Cleveland went into the half down by 8. Total momentum change.
Clearly, the Celtics have the talent to win. I think the growing frustration is that the outcome is not matching the talent nor the expectation. Let's look at it differently.
The positives: *Boston beat Cleveland in 3 quarters of play.
* Cleveland had no answer to Rajon Rondo.
* Marquis did a great job on Lebron.
* Ray Allen scored on a series of drives, and
did not settle for only outside shots.
* Cleveland was dominated for a half without
Boston's best offensive player.
* Tony Allen and BBD, did decent work off
the bench.
* Boston's defense of the lane was good
* Boston's defense was better than Cleveland's
offense.
The negatives: * Mike Brown out-coached Doc
* Rasheed was soft on the boards
* Nate who we got for Eddie and Co. is not
being used or trusted.
* Cleveland's PF are more active than ours.
* Boston QUIT in the 4th Quarter!!!!
* The Defensive breakdowns were on the
perimeter coverage.
* Boston has no mental toughness.
* The home crowd was weak.
* Big Baby cannot finish around the hoop.
* Shot distribution was off.
* Not enough looks for low post players.
While I was distraught about the outcome. The fact is, small things determine games. This game could have been won, even without PP. However, I do not think you can accurately theorize that any one game determines the future. It's kind of foolish. But what else do we have in between games to do....