Ken Berger claims that the trade offer was made 10 days ago
The Warriors decided to keep Monta Ellis, whom they refused to send to Memphis in a larger package that would've included Mayo -- a scenario that was broached about 10 days before the deadline but never gained any traction.
Not at the start of the season, or least not solely at the start of the season, like Tim Kawakami reported.
Who, I know you've been pretty vocal about locking Mayo in at the PG position.
What would've your thoughts been on a Mayo/Curry backcourt? Think it would've worked?
No, I don't think so. I think Curry is point guard too. I greatly dislike the idea of Curry playing as an off guard. At least Mayo is a good solid player as a two guard (not an elite player but a good 30-35 minute a night player). Curry wouldn't be -- far less effective defensively + rebounding and less involved as a passer which is a major problem because he's a gifted passer.
Mayo would have continued his development as a two guard and never fulfilled his potential while Curry would have remained on a similar track. Actually, he'd better off with Mayo than Ellis.
The Warriors should build around Steph Curry at the point. He'll be one of the most deadly offensive point guards in the league in a couple of years with his shooting ability + scoring ability + passing ability + vision + decision making + composure. Steph Curry and Anthony Randolph are Golden State's two most valuable pieces. Anthony Morrow would be my pick for third place.
I still would have made the deal if I were GSW. I think Mayo is the better trade asset and could have been flipped for a superior talent than they can get for Monta Ellis.