Author Topic: Celtics (29-14) at Hawks (29-14) 1/29  (Read 128080 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Celtics (29-14) at Hawks (29-14) 1/29
« Reply #345 on: January 29, 2010, 09:16:04 PM »

Offline MattG12

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3638
  • Tommy Points: 997
  • PEACE
This is ridiculous, both were jump ball and the refs call fouls on us. KG had 2 and 1's not given, why do the refs hate us?

Because that's what David Stern pays them to do.

Re: Celtics (29-14) at Hawks (29-14) 1/29
« Reply #346 on: January 29, 2010, 09:16:10 PM »

Offline ManUp

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8511
  • Tommy Points: 285
  • Rondo doesn't believe in easy buckets...
To be honest those are fouls(reaching across the mans body or jumping on him to tie up), but a lot of the times they are rewarded as jump balls.

Re: Celtics (29-14) at Hawks (29-14) 1/29
« Reply #347 on: January 29, 2010, 09:16:16 PM »

Offline buellj814

  • Al Horford
  • Posts: 494
  • Tommy Points: 74
Al Horford is a clown.. ive lost all respect i had for him.. r we in high school where hes doing his spirit fingers??? what the hell is wrong with him act like uve been there u clown

Re: Celtics (29-14) at Hawks (29-14) 1/29
« Reply #348 on: January 29, 2010, 09:16:20 PM »

Offline ejk3489

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2233
  • Tommy Points: 215
Here is how you know this team is done. They are playing about as well as they can and are still down 9. Rondo has shown some flashes, but for the most part he has been absent tonight. And other than his turnovers, Ray has not even been in the game tonight. If not for the captain, this would be a blowout.

They are no where near playing as well as they can.

Re: Celtics (29-14) at Hawks (29-14) 1/29
« Reply #349 on: January 29, 2010, 09:16:39 PM »

Offline Kuberski33

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7375
  • Tommy Points: 570
Better from the C's the last couple of minutes

Re: Celtics (29-14) at Hawks (29-14) 1/29
« Reply #350 on: January 29, 2010, 09:17:07 PM »

Offline Casperian

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3501
  • Tommy Points: 545
Both calls were correct, in my opinion.

*ducks*
In the summer of 2017, I predicted this team would not win a championship for the next 10 years.

3 down, 7 to go.

Re: Celtics (29-14) at Hawks (29-14) 1/29
« Reply #351 on: January 29, 2010, 09:17:11 PM »

Offline vinnie

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8654
  • Tommy Points: 429
Here is how you know this team is done. They are playing about as well as they can and are still down 9. Rondo has shown some flashes, but for the most part he has been absent tonight. And other than his turnovers, Ray has not even been in the game tonight. If not for the captain, this would be a blowout.

They are no where near playing as well as they can.

They are playing as well as they have played in the last few weeks and can barely keep up with the Hawks.

Re: Celtics (29-14) at Hawks (29-14) 1/29
« Reply #352 on: January 29, 2010, 09:17:20 PM »

Offline jadams5214

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1021
  • Tommy Points: 82
For all the ref talk keep in mind it's the Celtics who have been in the bonus since very early in this 3rd quarter.  They have failed to capitalize on that however.  

Re: Celtics (29-14) at Hawks (29-14) 1/29
« Reply #353 on: January 29, 2010, 09:17:33 PM »

Offline Neurotic Guy

  • Tommy Heinsohn
  • *************************
  • Posts: 25541
  • Tommy Points: 2720
Here is how you know this team is done. They are playing about as well as they can and are still down 9. Rondo has shown some flashes, but for the most part he has been absent tonight. And other than his turnovers, Ray has not even been in the game tonight. If not for the captain, this would be a blowout.

That's a strange comment.  Playing as well as they can, but Rondo and Allen not playing well?  

Re: Celtics (29-14) at Hawks (29-14) 1/29
« Reply #354 on: January 29, 2010, 09:17:57 PM »

Offline MattG12

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3638
  • Tommy Points: 997
  • PEACE
Both calls were correct, in my opinion.

*ducks*

*Throws things at you*

Re: Celtics (29-14) at Hawks (29-14) 1/29
« Reply #355 on: January 29, 2010, 09:18:00 PM »

Offline celticinorlando

  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32877
  • Tommy Points: 843
  • Larry Bird for President
can't wait to see how many calls the lakers get sunday  :-\

Re: Celtics (29-14) at Hawks (29-14) 1/29
« Reply #356 on: January 29, 2010, 09:18:18 PM »

Offline vinnie

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8654
  • Tommy Points: 429
For all the ref talk keep in mind it's the Celtics who have been in the bonus since very early in this 3rd quarter.  They have failed to capitalize on that however.  

I agree Adams. C's started shooting the bonus with more than 8 minutes left in the quarter.

Re: Celtics (29-14) at Hawks (29-14) 1/29
« Reply #357 on: January 29, 2010, 09:18:34 PM »

Offline ManUp

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8511
  • Tommy Points: 285
  • Rondo doesn't believe in easy buckets...
Make or break time.

We'll see what Sheed brings.

Re: Celtics (29-14) at Hawks (29-14) 1/29
« Reply #358 on: January 29, 2010, 09:18:41 PM »

Offline jdpapa3

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3884
  • Tommy Points: 85
Sorry, but it's not a foul if you aren't touching the guy.

Re: Celtics (29-14) at Hawks (29-14) 1/29
« Reply #359 on: January 29, 2010, 09:19:01 PM »

Offline Chief

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21257
  • Tommy Points: 2451
Get this with 5 before the 4th. That is the goal.

Once you are labeled 'the best' you want to stay up there, and you can't do it by loafing around.
 
Larry Bird