Author Topic: Celtics (29-14) at Hawks (29-14) 1/29  (Read 127720 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Celtics (29-14) at Hawks (29-14) 1/29
« Reply #105 on: January 29, 2010, 08:16:18 PM »

Offline Drucci

  • Global Moderator
  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7223
  • Tommy Points: 439
Getting outhustled by Pachulia... come on, have a little pride.

Re: Celtics (29-14) at Hawks (29-14) 1/29
« Reply #106 on: January 29, 2010, 08:16:22 PM »

Offline USG

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2126
  • Tommy Points: 161
Amazing...

Re: Celtics (29-14) at Hawks (29-14) 1/29
« Reply #107 on: January 29, 2010, 08:16:28 PM »

Offline Scott

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 970
  • Tommy Points: 108
oh come on!

Re: Celtics (29-14) at Hawks (29-14) 1/29
« Reply #108 on: January 29, 2010, 08:16:31 PM »

Offline jadams5214

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1021
  • Tommy Points: 82
Bad Eddie looks to be on the court again tonight ---not even close on his open 3 pointers.  

Tonights run --- Hawks go from down 9 to up 5 in just a few minutes of game time.  A 14 point swing it's the same old story so far tonight.

Re: Celtics (29-14) at Hawks (29-14) 1/29
« Reply #109 on: January 29, 2010, 08:16:32 PM »

Offline vinnie

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8654
  • Tommy Points: 429
With this lineup it is clear that Doc has no interest winning this game. But remember guys, regualr season games don't matter.

Re: Celtics (29-14) at Hawks (29-14) 1/29
« Reply #110 on: January 29, 2010, 08:16:47 PM »

Offline jdpapa3

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3884
  • Tommy Points: 85
Doc has got to stop with the wholesale substitutions. I say this a lot but our backup 5 are not good.

And Rasheed is reaaaaaaaaaaaallly wearing out his welcome.

Re: Celtics (29-14) at Hawks (29-14) 1/29
« Reply #111 on: January 29, 2010, 08:17:01 PM »

Offline ManUp

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8511
  • Tommy Points: 285
  • Rondo doesn't believe in easy buckets...
With this lineup it is clear that Doc has no interest winning this game. But remember guys, regualr season games don't matter.

lol, tp.

Re: Celtics (29-14) at Hawks (29-14) 1/29
« Reply #112 on: January 29, 2010, 08:17:11 PM »

Offline lon3lytoaster

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4608
  • Tommy Points: 157
  • Word aapp!
Edited.  Profanity and masked profanity are against forum rules and may result in discipline. is this? Dear God, this team.

Someone break out some Rocky clips, because we're going to be underdogs from here on out.

Re: Celtics (29-14) at Hawks (29-14) 1/29
« Reply #113 on: January 29, 2010, 08:17:16 PM »

Offline vinnie

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8654
  • Tommy Points: 429
Getting outhustled by Pachulia... come on, have a little pride.

Last night it was Gortat who knocked like three inbounds paases in a row out of bounds.

Re: Celtics (29-14) at Hawks (29-14) 1/29
« Reply #114 on: January 29, 2010, 08:17:27 PM »

Offline Change

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6666
  • Tommy Points: 544
With this lineup it is clear that Doc has no interest winning this game. But remember guys, regualr season games don't matter.

Hawks said it long time ago, you hit Celtics in the mouth they fold.

Re: Celtics (29-14) at Hawks (29-14) 1/29
« Reply #115 on: January 29, 2010, 08:17:31 PM »

Online Chief

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21257
  • Tommy Points: 2451
so i take it crawford is abusing us once again?

Orlando, between him and Pachulia, it's getting ugly.
Once you are labeled 'the best' you want to stay up there, and you can't do it by loafing around.
 
Larry Bird

Re: Celtics (29-14) at Hawks (29-14) 1/29
« Reply #116 on: January 29, 2010, 08:17:37 PM »

Kiorrik

  • Guest
Heya peeps. Was fiddling with my TV to get it working again, and before that I had visitors so I had the game on mute.

What'd I miss? We went up to 16-9 or something, then let them back in? Someone other than Celticinorlando or  jadams5241 gimme an answer here, I need an objective view, not just regular the negative bull.

Re: Celtics (29-14) at Hawks (29-14) 1/29
« Reply #117 on: January 29, 2010, 08:18:09 PM »

Offline celticinorlando

  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32877
  • Tommy Points: 843
  • Larry Bird for President
doc needs to experiment vs bad teams. he continues to do this vs good teams and the Cs end up coming up short in the end....i really am hoping for a trade deadline deal to wake this team up

Re: Celtics (29-14) at Hawks (29-14) 1/29
« Reply #118 on: January 29, 2010, 08:18:17 PM »

Offline xmuscularghandix

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7620
  • Tommy Points: 280
Gorman made me laugh a little when he compared Crawford to Eddie House. Not sure about you guys, but I think I would take Crawford 10 out of 10 times over Eddie.

I'm starting to think that I'd rather have ANYONE over Eddie. When he's hot he's hot, but I'm starting to think that it's outweighed by missed opportunities and lack of size on D.

Re: Celtics (29-14) at Hawks (29-14) 1/29
« Reply #119 on: January 29, 2010, 08:18:21 PM »

Offline vinnie

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8654
  • Tommy Points: 429
Heya peeps. Was fiddling with my TV to get it working again, and before that I had visitors so I had the game on mute.

What'd I miss? We went up to 16-9 or something, then let them back in? Someone other than Celticinorlando or  jadams5241 gimme an answer here, I need an objective view, not just regular the negative bull.

Celtics were up 9 and have collapsed since then. Only one doing anything was the Captain.