Author Topic: PATS vs RAVENS (1.10.10) AFC Wild Card  (Read 46194 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: PATS vs RAVENS (1.10.10) AFC Wild Card
« Reply #150 on: January 10, 2010, 03:27:42 PM »

Offline Roy Hobbs

  • In The Rafters
  • The Natural
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33333
  • Tommy Points: 6430
  • Doc could learn a thing or two from Norman Dale
Terrible spot.  There's no way Flacco was a yard short.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

Portland CrotoNats:  2009 CB Draft Champions

Re: PATS vs RAVENS (1.10.10) AFC Wild Card
« Reply #151 on: January 10, 2010, 03:30:56 PM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
Terrible spot.  There's no way Flacco was a yard short.
Good challenge, this should result in a first down.

Even if it doesn't they should go for it.

Re: PATS vs RAVENS (1.10.10) AFC Wild Card
« Reply #152 on: January 10, 2010, 03:32:18 PM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
Pats need a huge stand now.

Re: PATS vs RAVENS (1.10.10) AFC Wild Card
« Reply #153 on: January 10, 2010, 03:32:26 PM »

Offline Roy Hobbs

  • In The Rafters
  • The Natural
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33333
  • Tommy Points: 6430
  • Doc could learn a thing or two from Norman Dale
Question:  even if that hadn't been a first down, why wouldn't it have been considered a successful challenge?  Clearly, the original spot was wrong.

I'm assuming that's a rule?  If you challenge the spot, it's only a successful challenge if the play results in a first down?

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

Portland CrotoNats:  2009 CB Draft Champions

Re: PATS vs RAVENS (1.10.10) AFC Wild Card
« Reply #154 on: January 10, 2010, 03:34:10 PM »

Offline Roy Hobbs

  • In The Rafters
  • The Natural
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33333
  • Tommy Points: 6430
  • Doc could learn a thing or two from Norman Dale
That's the game.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

Portland CrotoNats:  2009 CB Draft Champions

Re: PATS vs RAVENS (1.10.10) AFC Wild Card
« Reply #155 on: January 10, 2010, 03:35:06 PM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
Question:  even if that hadn't been a first down, why wouldn't it have been considered a successful challenge?  Clearly, the original spot was wrong.

I'm assuming that's a rule?  If you challenge the spot, it's only a successful challenge if the play results in a first down?
No, because Bellichek and several other coaches abused that. They'd challenge spots and they'd almost always succeed as the ball usually gets moved some. It gave them extra time outs in essence.

So now you have to challenge whether or not its a first down, or something else on the play for it to be "successful".

Re: PATS vs RAVENS (1.10.10) AFC Wild Card
« Reply #156 on: January 10, 2010, 03:38:52 PM »

Offline Aeacus

  • The Green Kornet
  • Posts: 78
  • Tommy Points: 110
Question:  even if that hadn't been a first down, why wouldn't it have been considered a successful challenge?  Clearly, the original spot was wrong.

I'm assuming that's a rule?  If you challenge the spot, it's only a successful challenge if the play results in a first down?

Yep they changed it a season or two ago. Since you got an extra challenge if you won the first two, they decided you shouldn't always win a spot challenge (Since they almost always move the ball at least a little and that used to be considered a successful challenge).  Now to be successful it needs to result in a first down.

Re: PATS vs RAVENS (1.10.10) AFC Wild Card
« Reply #157 on: January 10, 2010, 03:41:15 PM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
Question:  even if that hadn't been a first down, why wouldn't it have been considered a successful challenge?  Clearly, the original spot was wrong.

I'm assuming that's a rule?  If you challenge the spot, it's only a successful challenge if the play results in a first down?

Yep they changed it a season or two ago. Since you got an extra challenge if you won the first two, they decided you shouldn't always win a spot challenge (Since they almost always move the ball at least a little and that used to be considered a successful challenge).  Now to be successful it needs to result in a first down.
Which results in a weird situation sometimes. A coach will challenge an awful spot knowing he's going to lose just to get the yards back.

Re: PATS vs RAVENS (1.10.10) AFC Wild Card
« Reply #158 on: January 10, 2010, 03:42:44 PM »

Offline Aeacus

  • The Green Kornet
  • Posts: 78
  • Tommy Points: 110
Not sure I like that challenge.  I'd rather have it in my pocket in case something weird happens that gave the Pats a score on an incorrect call. The 2pt try wasn't that important

Re: PATS vs RAVENS (1.10.10) AFC Wild Card
« Reply #159 on: January 10, 2010, 03:44:43 PM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
Not sure I like that challenge.  I'd rather have it in my pocket in case something weird happens that gave the Pats a score on an incorrect call. The 2pt try wasn't that important
Yes and no, I can see his thinking if his coaches told them they'd win. Either way its not going to matter.

Re: PATS vs RAVENS (1.10.10) AFC Wild Card
« Reply #160 on: January 10, 2010, 03:45:30 PM »

Offline celticinorlando

  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32877
  • Tommy Points: 843
  • Larry Bird for President
unfortunately for the Pats...the game was decided in that first quarter...never seen brady or the pats come out so flat like that before

Re: PATS vs RAVENS (1.10.10) AFC Wild Card
« Reply #161 on: January 10, 2010, 03:45:38 PM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48121
  • Tommy Points: 8800
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
Aiken might be unconscious.

Re: PATS vs RAVENS (1.10.10) AFC Wild Card
« Reply #162 on: January 10, 2010, 03:49:01 PM »

Offline Roy Hobbs

  • In The Rafters
  • The Natural
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33333
  • Tommy Points: 6430
  • Doc could learn a thing or two from Norman Dale
It was all for naught, but that was one heck of an effort by Edelman.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

Portland CrotoNats:  2009 CB Draft Champions

Re: PATS vs RAVENS (1.10.10) AFC Wild Card
« Reply #163 on: January 10, 2010, 03:49:35 PM »

Offline mahonedog88

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2194
  • Tommy Points: 119
There's so much to be mad about in this game.

But instead of repeating what everyone is going to say...I'm thinkin I'll try and bring something up that maybe many people havent thought of.

This team, obviously, is COMPLETELY different without Wes Welker.  There's been all this talk about how the defense needs to improve, they need some playmakers.  Well the same can be said about the offense.  Now with there being a good chance that Welker won't be ready for next season, let alone ever be the same player again, I think it's time the Pats take a serious look at either making trade for a legit receiver or look to draft an instant playmaking receiver.

Brandon Marshall anyone?

Re: PATS vs RAVENS (1.10.10) AFC Wild Card
« Reply #164 on: January 10, 2010, 03:52:56 PM »

Offline Aeacus

  • The Green Kornet
  • Posts: 78
  • Tommy Points: 110
That was pass interference.  Nothing going right for the pats in this game.  Time for a lot of running plays from the Ravens.