Author Topic: Walker, William?  (Read 10937 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Walker, William?
« on: January 02, 2010, 11:10:30 PM »

Offline StartOrien

  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12961
  • Tommy Points: 1200
Anyone else find it weird that a game that we're down Pierce, Daniels, KG, and Rondo, where JR Giddens is our starting Small Foward that Sky Walker still doesn't get ANY burn at all?

Is he in Doc's dog house? I mean, if there was a time to see what we got in him you'd think that it would've been tonight. Particularly when that second unit was struggling in the first half. But still, nothing. Just seems odd to me.

Re: Walker, William?
« Reply #1 on: January 02, 2010, 11:17:08 PM »

Offline scoop

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 663
  • Tommy Points: 74
No, I don't find it weird. Doc played a 10 men rotation, so it'd be more weird if he had gone with an 11 men rotation. Giddens obviously played ahead of Walker as he's a much better defender and has been practising with the team since day 1 in training camp.

Re: Walker, William?
« Reply #2 on: January 02, 2010, 11:20:06 PM »

Offline Change

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6666
  • Tommy Points: 544
Why would you say that? We play to win the game. JR started for exceptional D, and to try to neutralize Hedo. Right now Walker role is being Roster#15. Its sucks for Billy, but patience is a virtue.

Re: Walker, William?
« Reply #3 on: January 02, 2010, 11:34:21 PM »

Offline wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34127
  • Tommy Points: 1612
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
Whatever JR has shown Doc in practice, Walker has not shown the same level.

Re: Walker, William?
« Reply #4 on: January 02, 2010, 11:47:16 PM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48121
  • Tommy Points: 8800
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
Walker will not be on this team past this year and my guess here is he probably won't even make it until the end of the year. He will be traded or released outright to make way to sign someone else.

Giddens started and Walker didn't play in a game where 4 of the top 7 Celtics in the rotation were out hurt. That is not a statement on how bad a decison Doc made or how bad a coach Doc is, especially since his coaching was praised by Tony Allen after the game on radio and also because the Celtics won, but it is a statement of just how bad a player Bill Walker probably is at this point.

Re: Walker, William?
« Reply #5 on: January 02, 2010, 11:52:37 PM »

Offline vinnie

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8654
  • Tommy Points: 429
Niether Giddens nor Walker should be with this team next year.

Re: Walker, William?
« Reply #6 on: January 02, 2010, 11:55:26 PM »

Offline StartOrien

  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12961
  • Tommy Points: 1200
Why would you say that?

I say it just because if I'm the coach or general manager I'd like to see what I have in Bill Walker. And besides that I thought that early in the second quarter that this team needed a spark off the bench and Bill Walker could contribute.

I'm not bashing Doc for the decision, I'm sure there's a healthy stream of logic to him not playing. But I find it odd that at the end of last season it seemed like Walker was very much "a head" of Giddens and that before this season started a lot of people speculated that Walker would have a role on this team playing between 4 and 10 minutes a night.

Yet in a game where we're down 4 players, where there was a point where I thought that they could've used his offense, Walker still couldn't get any burn.

Re: Walker, William?
« Reply #7 on: January 02, 2010, 11:58:25 PM »

Offline vinnie

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8654
  • Tommy Points: 429
What has either Walker or Giddens shown that says they should be getting playing time? I don't get it. Lester Hudson is the only guy I have seen this year who appears to have promise as a backup point guard and even his minutes have been too limited to make a judgment. Too many fans fall in love with guys who are no better than 11th, 12th or even 15th players on the roster.

Re: Walker, William?
« Reply #8 on: January 03, 2010, 12:05:15 AM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48121
  • Tommy Points: 8800
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
Why would you say that?

I say it just because if I'm the coach or general manager I'd like to see what I have in Bill Walker. And besides that I thought that early in the second quarter that this team needed a spark off the bench and Bill Walker could contribute.

I'm not bashing Doc for the decision, I'm sure there's a healthy stream of logic to him not playing. But I find it odd that at the end of last season it seemed like Walker was very much "a head" of Giddens and that before this season started a lot of people speculated that Walker would have a role on this team playing between 4 and 10 minutes a night.

Yet in a game where we're down 4 players, where there was a point where I thought that they could've used his offense, Walker still couldn't get any burn.

Except, the Celtics coaching staff and front office don't get to see and judge Walker's game based on game play action. They see him all the time in practice, pre-season, Summer League, D-League film, etc. They don't NEED to see him in game action to know he isn't ready to play NBA level basketball. Only fans do.

Doc had a ten player rotation tonight. That's enough and it must have been the right decision because they won the game.

We as fans have to learn that players ARE NOT GIVEN playing time to prove they should stay on the court but that players HAVE TO EARN playing time by performing in practice to prove they belong on the court. This is an extremely simple concept used by coaches in all sports from the youngest organized sports levels all the way up to the pros.

Re: Walker, William?
« Reply #9 on: January 03, 2010, 01:27:27 AM »

Offline KungPoweChicken

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2103
  • Tommy Points: 229
Whatever JR has shown Doc in practice, Walker has not shown the same level.


How do you know? I guess Tom Brady didn't bring it in practice back when Drew was getting the starts. (I'm not comparing Walker to Brady, just making a point). Coaches can be wrong.

Re: Walker, William?
« Reply #10 on: January 03, 2010, 01:42:35 AM »

Offline wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34127
  • Tommy Points: 1612
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
Whatever JR has shown Doc in practice, Walker has not shown the same level.


How do you know? I guess Tom Brady didn't bring it in practice back when Drew was getting the starts. (I'm not comparing Walker to Brady, just making a point). Coaches can be wrong.


Because Doc picked JR to play, not Walker. 

JR must have shown more in practice. 


And there is something QB like Bledsoe could do, look really good in practice.  He knew how to run and offense and could make any throw. 

Re: Walker, William?
« Reply #11 on: January 03, 2010, 01:55:45 AM »

Offline xmuscularghandix

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7620
  • Tommy Points: 280
Whatever JR has shown Doc in practice, Walker has not shown the same level.


How do you know? I guess Tom Brady didn't bring it in practice back when Drew was getting the starts. (I'm not comparing Walker to Brady, just making a point). Coaches can be wrong.


Because Doc picked JR to play, not Walker. 

JR must have shown more in practice. 


And there is something QB like Bledsoe could do, look really good in practice.  He knew how to run and offense and could make any throw. 

Except the quick one when he was under pressure.

Re: Walker, William?
« Reply #12 on: January 03, 2010, 01:56:45 AM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48121
  • Tommy Points: 8800
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
Whatever JR has shown Doc in practice, Walker has not shown the same level.


How do you know? I guess Tom Brady didn't bring it in practice back when Drew was getting the starts. (I'm not comparing Walker to Brady, just making a point). Coaches can be wrong.
But the reason Brady was on the 2001 Patriots and the reason he was the #2 starter was because in practice and the film room and the weight room he had surpassed Michael Bishop on the depth chart at the end of the 2000 year and made Bishop expendable for the 2001 year.

Brady made 3 whole passes in a regualr season game before earning the right to be called the team's backup QB and then played so well he never gave up the spot. But his talent was first seen and displayed to the coaching staff in every area but the field before making his full time debut. That he did what he did is a testament to what he learned and performed in practice and other areas first.

Re: Walker, William?
« Reply #13 on: January 03, 2010, 01:57:00 AM »

Offline wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34127
  • Tommy Points: 1612
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
Whatever JR has shown Doc in practice, Walker has not shown the same level.


How do you know? I guess Tom Brady didn't bring it in practice back when Drew was getting the starts. (I'm not comparing Walker to Brady, just making a point). Coaches can be wrong.


Because Doc picked JR to play, not Walker. 

JR must have shown more in practice. 


And there is something QB like Bledsoe could do, look really good in practice.  He knew how to run and offense and could make any throw. 

Except the quick one when he was under pressure.

And how often does that happen in practice (with those lovely red jerseys)

Re: Walker, William?
« Reply #14 on: January 03, 2010, 01:57:54 AM »

Offline KungPoweChicken

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2103
  • Tommy Points: 229
Whatever JR has shown Doc in practice, Walker has not shown the same level.


How do you know? I guess Tom Brady didn't bring it in practice back when Drew was getting the starts. (I'm not comparing Walker to Brady, just making a point). Coaches can be wrong.


Because Doc picked JR to play, not Walker. 

JR must have shown more in practice. 


And there is something QB like Bledsoe could do, look really good in practice.  He knew how to run and offense and could make any throw. 


Who cares what Bledsoe could do? Tom is and always was a far superior QB, but he didn't see the field. I guess he didn't "bring enough" in practice.