2009-10 Prediction Thread Revisited

[Fafnir]

KWhit10 - Blazers will have team chemistry issues, and will greatly underachieve and getting the 5/6 seed at best.

If by chemistry you mean injury... 

[Donoghus]

Definitely a good (and funny) read.  Thanks for bumping it.

[ACF]

This made me think about the "What will the Celtics' RS record be?" TP thingy I made. I don't think anyone said 50 and 32 but if you did, find your post, quote it and we'll see about the TP's 

[Roy Hobbs]

I'll take the blame for jinxing the Celtics, with this article:

http://www.celticsblog.com/2009/10/5/1068888/offseason-mission-accomplished



"Mission Accomplished" = 0-for-2

(I also predicted somewhere that we'd win 64 games and the title.  In other news, I suck at predictions.)

[PosImpos]

Ah...I can still remember the days when this season looked like it was going to be something special.

Thanks for reminding me.  

I'll take the blame for jinxing the Celtics, with this article:

http://www.celticsblog.com/2009/10/5/1068888/offseason-mission-accomplished



"Mission Accomplished" = 0-for-2

(I also predicted somewhere that we'd win 64 games and the title.  In other news, I suck at predictions.)

Wow, Roy, you couldn't have been more wrong.  But I know that at the time you wrote it, I completely agreed with everything you said.  I can't fault Danny; he made moves that made a lot of sense at the time.  I don't think he really could have foreseen just how badly those moves would fail.