Author Topic: No Grant Hill without the full MLE?  (Read 4126 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

No Grant Hill without the full MLE?
« on: July 01, 2009, 09:22:29 AM »

Offline Drucci

  • Global Moderator
  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7223
  • Tommy Points: 439
OK, I know everyone is focused on Sheed and excited about his possible signing with the Celtics, and so I am. Grant Hill's name has been quoted a lot during this offseason. I love the player and he would be a good backup for Pierce, but I would rather take Barnes or another wing before Hill considering that he is injury prone. Phoenix's medical staff did a great job of keeping him in shape (he played 82 games for the first time in his career at 36!) but I'm not sure he would look so physically good in Boston.

Anyway, the latest news from Marc Stein are saying that Hill is considering all the options since it will probably be his last contract, but that he is very bounded to Phoenix, and that the full MLE would probably be one of the only contracts that make him leave Phoenix.

Here is the quote :

Quote
No less interesting that Kidd's foray into free agency is the case of Suns swingman Grant Hill, who said last week during his participation in Steve Nash's annual Showdown in Chinatown charity soccer game in New York that he is determined to listen to every proposal he gets, figuring that this could be his last real chance, at 36, to be widely courted.

Fresh off a trip to the Western Conference finals, Denver keeps coming up as a team hot for Hill, who earned less than $4 million over the past two seasons with the Suns but just played in all 82 games for the first time in his career, averaging 12.0 points and 4.9 rebounds and shooting a robust 52.3 percent from the field. Boston is another team that has Hill on its radar and more are sure to emerge.

The Suns, meanwhile, should certainly have a shot to hang onto Hill, given his close ties to Suns guard Steve Nash -- assuming Nash eventually accepts the contract extension Phoenix is offering -- and Hill's affinity for the athletic training staff that has resuscitated his career after some six years of injury misery. Yet if Hill were to receive a full mid-level offer from a contender he likes, Phoenix won't be trying to match given its well-chronicled desire to keep moving away from the luxury-tax line.

Stein is saying that Phoenix wouldn't match the full MLE if it was offered for Hill, not that Hill is considering to leave only for the full MLE, but still I think we all agree that the full MLE would be too much for a player like Hill, especially if we are in a good position to sign Rasheed.

Re: No Grant Hill without the full MLE?
« Reply #1 on: July 01, 2009, 09:23:38 AM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
Way too much for Grant Hill, I'd love to have him but he's a 37 year old wing. Plus our need at the 4/5 is greater.

Re: No Grant Hill without the full MLE?
« Reply #2 on: July 01, 2009, 09:26:23 AM »

Offline silvershamrocker

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 572
  • Tommy Points: 157
  • Believe In The Sleeve
I agree that that's too much... but I don't see why he wouldn't want to come to Boston for, say, the LLE. The Suns are blowing up their team.


"It will be fun watching the Lakers get those balloons down one at a time." - Bill Russell

Re: No Grant Hill without the full MLE?
« Reply #3 on: July 01, 2009, 09:30:06 AM »

Offline Jon

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6500
  • Tommy Points: 385
I'm sure Grant Hill would love the MLE.  So would I.  However, both of us aren't getting it. 

Re: No Grant Hill without the full MLE?
« Reply #4 on: July 01, 2009, 09:38:15 AM »

Offline Roy Hobbs

  • In The Rafters
  • The Natural
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33333
  • Tommy Points: 6430
  • Doc could learn a thing or two from Norman Dale
As others have said, I can't imagine any team paying a 37 year old wing with a history of injury issues the MLE.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

Portland CrotoNats:  2009 CB Draft Champions

Re: No Grant Hill without the full MLE?
« Reply #5 on: July 01, 2009, 09:46:26 AM »

Offline wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34125
  • Tommy Points: 1612
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
Right now, players are putting out statements in hope of driving up prices. 


Wait and see what happens.

Re: No Grant Hill without the full MLE?
« Reply #6 on: July 01, 2009, 09:56:09 AM »

Offline ssspence

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6375
  • Tommy Points: 403
He still had one of the worst injury records in league history. He's a LLE player, as he has been for the past two years. Why would be go back to PHX to lose when he could come to Boston or go to Denver to win? I actually can't see him Denver. That's a punk team, he likes the more professional vibe...
Mike

(My name is not Mike)

Re: No Grant Hill without the full MLE?
« Reply #7 on: July 01, 2009, 10:06:38 AM »

Offline screwedupmaniac

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 934
  • Tommy Points: 205
not worth it at all...what happens if he decides to get injured the first week into the season? a whole lot of money spent for nothing. it's too bad, i like the guy, he's classy, keeps his mouth shut, and lets his game do the talking (a lot like ray). he'd be great for us.

Re: No Grant Hill without the full MLE?
« Reply #8 on: July 01, 2009, 10:23:11 AM »

Offline celticpride07

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1236
  • Tommy Points: 222
on espn a few minutes ago ithink it was chris mannix said grant hill had interest in boston cause of doc rivers and their orlando days.
Pick 2 Heat: 
Pg: Jennings/Vasquez
Sg: Wade/R. Allen/Rivers
SF: Lebron/M. Williams
PF: Bosh/Humphries
C: B. Lopez/Dalembert/Anthony

Re: No Grant Hill without the full MLE?
« Reply #9 on: July 01, 2009, 11:06:35 AM »

Offline toinewalka

  • Anfernee Simons
  • Posts: 382
  • Tommy Points: 18
I belive he is seriously considering Boston due to their chances at winning.  I also think the more buzz you generate around larger contracts, the move it seems like you deserve them and people will think they are saving money by offering you slightly less (which is more than you expected in the first place).  Age old agent trick.  I think Grant might end up here for someone around the LLE, maybe a little more if we have it, but he wants to win.  He isn't an extravegant guy that needs a huge contract to live out retirement in the lime light.  He just wants some jewelry to look at while he lays out in the sun at 38-39 years old as a retired star.

Re: No Grant Hill without the full MLE?
« Reply #10 on: July 01, 2009, 11:11:43 AM »

Offline CelticWes34

  • Josh Minott
  • Posts: 121
  • Tommy Points: 20
on espn a few minutes ago ithink it was chris mannix said grant hill had interest in boston cause of doc rivers and their orlando days.

Whoo hoo! Come to Boston, Grant! But only for the LLE!  ;)
Carl: And, technically, he's supposed to be spayed, and uh, he ain't that. I know that first hand. Go ahead, ask me how I know. Go ahead. Ask me. Ask me how I know.

Re: No Grant Hill without the full MLE?
« Reply #11 on: July 01, 2009, 11:12:14 AM »

Offline Donoghus

  • Global Moderator
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33120
  • Tommy Points: 1742
  • What a Pub Should Be
No way would I consider throwing the entire MLE at him.


2010 CB Historical Draft - Best Overall Team

Re: No Grant Hill without the full MLE?
« Reply #12 on: July 01, 2009, 11:25:35 AM »

Offline Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 53415
  • Tommy Points: 2578
If it was only a one year contract, I wouldn't have a problem giving him the MLE.

I'd rather not do so, but it would be okay.

Re: No Grant Hill without the full MLE?
« Reply #13 on: July 01, 2009, 11:27:02 AM »

Offline RAcker

  • Al Horford
  • ***
  • Posts: 3892
  • Tommy Points: 69
  • Law mercy!
At that price, I'll pass Mr. Hill.

Re: No Grant Hill without the full MLE?
« Reply #14 on: July 01, 2009, 11:43:14 AM »

Offline JHTruth

  • NCE
  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2297
  • Tommy Points: 111
Um, he's only made the LLE for the past two years. What makes him think he deserves the MLE now? Really now..