0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Redz on September 13, 2008, 05:04:32 PMQuote from: Schupac on September 13, 2008, 04:59:25 PMQuoteAnyone wana guess what his 1000th post will be? I'm tipping a dedication thread to his girlfriend hahaOn that note: can I nominate myself for most likely to contribute to a thread that's dead? lolWhich raises the question... who is the #1 thread killer? I don't think I could win it but I'll put myself in for an honorable mention. Every thread I hop into seems to dissapear in a day.I feel like by replying to that I'll be blowing your theory!try mespecially when i tipe in my "perfecto" ingles nobody gets.
Quote from: Schupac on September 13, 2008, 04:59:25 PMQuoteAnyone wana guess what his 1000th post will be? I'm tipping a dedication thread to his girlfriend hahaOn that note: can I nominate myself for most likely to contribute to a thread that's dead? lolWhich raises the question... who is the #1 thread killer? I don't think I could win it but I'll put myself in for an honorable mention. Every thread I hop into seems to dissapear in a day.I feel like by replying to that I'll be blowing your theory!
QuoteAnyone wana guess what his 1000th post will be? I'm tipping a dedication thread to his girlfriend hahaOn that note: can I nominate myself for most likely to contribute to a thread that's dead? lolWhich raises the question... who is the #1 thread killer? I don't think I could win it but I'll put myself in for an honorable mention. Every thread I hop into seems to dissapear in a day.
Anyone wana guess what his 1000th post will be? I'm tipping a dedication thread to his girlfriend hahaOn that note: can I nominate myself for most likely to contribute to a thread that's dead? lol
Creepiest obsession with fruit: Redz
Which definitely leads credence to the following superlative.Most easily amused: Redz
who do we vote in for most likely to not understand online sarcasm?
Quote from: Redz on September 14, 2008, 09:20:19 AMWhich definitely leads credence to the following superlative.Most easily amused: Redz I'm not sure about that Redz, I might have to challenge you for that...afterall I did check back to the Apples and Oranges thread every hour for a few days.
Quote from: cdif911 on September 14, 2008, 09:40:09 AMwho do we vote in for most likely to not understand online sarcasm? What's that supposed to mean? You taking a shot at me or something? I am a bit uncomfortable with what you're inferring here!MODERATOR, may I have a ruling here?
Quote from: SShorefan 3.0 on September 14, 2008, 12:10:18 PMQuote from: cdif911 on September 14, 2008, 09:40:09 AMwho do we vote in for most likely to not understand online sarcasm? What's that supposed to mean? You taking a shot at me or something? I am a bit uncomfortable with what you're inferring here!MODERATOR, may I have a ruling here?lol to you and KW for the perfect responses to that one - I just feel like people often respond in anger to posts I make sarcastically, I feel if the medium of the internet is lacking one thing, its the ability to appropriately express sarcasm - though I guess using the rolly eyes emoticon could help....
Quote from: cdif911 on September 14, 2008, 02:36:45 PMQuote from: SShorefan 3.0 on September 14, 2008, 12:10:18 PMQuote from: cdif911 on September 14, 2008, 09:40:09 AMwho do we vote in for most likely to not understand online sarcasm? What's that supposed to mean? You taking a shot at me or something? I am a bit uncomfortable with what you're inferring here!MODERATOR, may I have a ruling here?lol to you and KW for the perfect responses to that one - I just feel like people often respond in anger to posts I make sarcastically, I feel if the medium of the internet is lacking one thing, its the ability to appropriately express sarcasm - though I guess using the rolly eyes emoticon could help....The inability to show facial expressions or use inflections with the delivery makes the sarcasm a little tougher to decipher sometimes. Plus, it just goes over people's heads sometimes.
Quote from: Redz on September 15, 2008, 10:15:36 AMQuote from: cdif911 on September 14, 2008, 02:36:45 PMQuote from: SShorefan 3.0 on September 14, 2008, 12:10:18 PMQuote from: cdif911 on September 14, 2008, 09:40:09 AMwho do we vote in for most likely to not understand online sarcasm? What's that supposed to mean? You taking a shot at me or something? I am a bit uncomfortable with what you're inferring here!MODERATOR, may I have a ruling here?lol to you and KW for the perfect responses to that one - I just feel like people often respond in anger to posts I make sarcastically, I feel if the medium of the internet is lacking one thing, its the ability to appropriately express sarcasm - though I guess using the rolly eyes emoticon could help....The inability to show facial expressions or use inflections with the delivery makes the sarcasm a little tougher to decipher sometimes. Plus, it just goes over people's heads sometimes. You know, the guy on the right in this photo looks a bit like Doug Flutie. But who's the guy on the left?Huh?Oh it's a woman! Ummmm, sorry!