Author Topic: Agree or disagree: "Bird couldn't make Boston a Celtics town."  (Read 6061 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Agree or disagree: "Bird couldn't make Boston a Celtics town."
« Reply #15 on: September 15, 2008, 09:44:06 AM »

Offline SShorefan 3.0

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 633
  • Tommy Points: 202
I almost posted this thread when I saw Reilly's comments the other day.

My two cents is that Reilly has a short memory.  The Celtics and Bruins owned this town in the 80's with the Red Sox third and the Pats 4th.  I'd like to say that Boston was a green town in the 80's but I honestly think it was a green / black and gold town.  (For the record, I can't stand professional hockey)

Larry Bird dominated this town for an entire decade, as evident by the consecutive sellouts at the Garden (which was not happening over at Fenway or down in Foxboro), however the city also had a love affair going on with the Bruins that was in part left over from the 70's and from the teams in the mid  to late 80's who made it to the Stanley Cup Finals twice -- only to be swept twice)

Between the Celtics and Bruins, Causeway Street was never busier and more happening than it was from 1983 - 1990 and this town had more green than red and blue.......but it also had more black and gold too.

I love my kids - Call me a sap, but it's true.

Re: Agree or disagree: "Bird couldn't make Boston a Celtics town."
« Reply #16 on: September 16, 2008, 01:21:37 PM »

Offline TitleMaster

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 980
  • Tommy Points: 117
I agree with the whole Sox town mentality.

Here's why... the Red Sox fans (even bandwagoners) perennially suffer the 'so close' syndrome of lost love and all that jazz (plus fantasies of curses and New England haunted lakes in Sudbury) but lifelong Celts fans have always had a quiet confidence about their team, even during the '78/'79 time when it was restructuring. Since the impossible dream season of '67, it's always been about the '75 Carlton Fisk home run and '78 Bucky F*-ing Dent, as if anticipation and suffering are akin to being a fan.

I recall the 70s squad of Havlicek, Cowens, and JoJo. Come on, everyone knew that they could win at any time and from '72 to '76 (the Paul Silas era), half the time when one of the big four weren't injured, they did win a title. And really, Cowens quit after that Phoenix series because Silas, his b-ball soulmate wasn't rehired. So all in all, the Bird era was really a continuation of a quiet type of confidence that one's b-ball franchise was the [Brazil-to-soccer] but of [Boston-to-basketball]. The difference being was that Bird attracted more attention, esp from the layperson who'd never watch JoJo White shoot lights out but would rather see it from a blue collar white guy from Indiana. And this extended even beyond New England where really, the Celtics reflected a type of white man, working class ethic. Bird was that and that's why the Celts had unheard of viewership in the 80s. But for the lifelong Celts fans, it was a part of a continuum.

Re: Agree or disagree: "Bird couldn't make Boston a Celtics town."
« Reply #17 on: September 16, 2008, 01:27:18 PM »

Offline Reyquila

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1046
  • Tommy Points: 141
  • Let them hate, as long as they fear
Larry Bird = Boston Celtic town, anywhichway you look at it.
And someday in the midst of time,
When they ask you if you knew me
Remember that you were a friend of mine