cdif, you know I have supported your posts many times over, but I think your approach is off on this one. The high road on this issue is a no-brainer if one has kids -- perhaps a bit more difficult to do so if you are sans kids.
As a parent we've all sold raffle tickets to friends and strangers to help our kids and we've all bought hoards of "crap" from the countless fundraisers thrust upon us. It's what we do because nothing in the world is more precious than our children.
I will vote again tomorrow and again the next day -- just as I'd buy the raffle ticket. It's what we do.
I'll admit I have no children, but I do work with them, coach them, all that good stuff. My problem with this whole thing is the entitlement going on. I've been approached by parents at my work who try to get me to buy stuff their kids are selling. Do you know how much I hate that? If a kid comes to me and says can you support whatever it is I'm doing, if I have the cash (or the vote in this case) and I know the kid, know the cause, its a no brainer. But a parent pushing it is a problem. Kids these days have everything done for them. Everything gets handed to them. The best lesson a kid can learn is how to advocate for himself or herself. The worst lesson a kid can learn is if I don't do it, Daddy will. So yes its great to support your kids, every parent should and I'm not faulting the parent for doing that. Its the approach that bothers me. (and the fact that this is a competition, not a fundraiser, makes me look at all candidates equally, but thats another part of the argument)
Promoting the Celtics is also not a "fundraiser", it's a competition. There's nothing about this approach that is shameless promotion
or enablement - just a caring parent asking local group for help. What's the difference if this parent ran an ad in the newspaper, or put a memo out to co-workers? If you see this kind of thing on the "Classifieds" board at the grocery store, do you tear it down because you don't agree with it?
This is a community here, and there are bloggers here always asking for help with things, personal, business, or whatever ... and we do our best to pitch-in, because this
IS a community, and a
special one, I like to think. I don't question your right to be annoyed about
anything, that's what our freedoms allow for, and disagreement is why we're here ... it's what a blog is
about. What I question is the need to shoot this parent down, and their obvious pride in their child, or do
anything negative in this instance.
Why can't a person come on here and say: "I love my kid, and I'd like your help with something"? People ask for personal help here all the time ... issues at work, family stuff, even
potty-training, (just recently). Sorry, but I don't see the need or point of shooting that stuff down. It's just someone reaching out, and if you don't want to help, that's fine ... if it bothers you,
that's fine ... but what's the necessity in commenting on it negatively? If you disagree, then move on to something else, but it's just hurtful to tell a parent what they should or shouldn't do for their kids, or that it's wrong or not worthwhile.
Like I said, it's your right to feel the way you do, and your right to express it. I just think in a case like this, that stating anything negative serves no constructive
purpose, and is taking the low road. This was an obviously decent, caring parent, asking this community for help, and I personally feel this is some of the
best stuff we can contribute, and it should be encouraged, not disparaged. There's far too
few parents who take such an active role in their kids' life, and those who do should be praised for it, not shot down.
I'm not trying to grand-stand here ... I concede you your negative views and opinions on this matter, you're as entitled as I am to my supportive ones, I just don't see the point in sharing them in this case, or what good can come of it. Guess that's what makes the world go round ... but if we can't help each other out, what's the point?