Author Topic: Celtics trade thought dump  (Read 600 times)

Moranis and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Celtics trade thought dump
« on: May 25, 2026, 09:34:30 AM »

Offline CFAN38

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5076
  • Tommy Points: 447
As I try to ignore the Knicks fans in my life and read/listen about the draft the trade landscape has been an interesting side note to ponder.


First I do not think Stevens splits up JB and JT coming off what was supposed to be a down year while JT got healthy.

I do think there is an outside chance we see White moved in an effort to capitalize on his likely peaked value.


Without claiming any deep understanding of the current CBA I do think the Cs/Stevens will play it smart and target staying under the lux tax for another season. This likely signals smaller moves aimed at maximizing the roster without taking on crazy amounts of money.


Moves I can see happening

Hauser is traded to shave off $$$ and open up minutes for Bayor/Hugo/Walsh.

On " The Game Theory Podcast" it was speculated that Hauser to Detroit for #21 would be about the max draft capital value for Hauser. This opened up the door for me to ponder the following trade scenario.

move #1 Giannis is traded to (insert non-Celtics team)

move #2 Celitics trade #27 to Bucks for Bobby Portis

move #3 Celtics trade Hauser + 40 + 2027 1st to Hornets for #18 (if Hauser alone could net #21 shouldn't Hauser +#40+2027 1st net #18?). This feels like a great spot in the draft to grab a slipping lottery talent.





       
Mavs
Wiz
Hornet

Re: Celtics trade thought dump
« Reply #1 on: May 25, 2026, 09:56:26 AM »

Offline Vermont Green

  • Cedric Maxwell
  • **************
  • Posts: 14979
  • Tommy Points: 1106
As I try to ignore the Knicks fans in my life and read/listen about the draft the trade landscape has been an interesting side note to ponder.


First I do not think Stevens splits up JB and JT coming off what was supposed to be a down year while JT got healthy.

I do think there is an outside chance we see White moved in an effort to capitalize on his likely peaked value.


Without claiming any deep understanding of the current CBA I do think the Cs/Stevens will play it smart and target staying under the lux tax for another season. This likely signals smaller moves aimed at maximizing the roster without taking on crazy amounts of money.


Moves I can see happening

Hauser is traded to shave off $$$ and open up minutes for Bayor/Hugo/Walsh.

On " The Game Theory Podcast" it was speculated that Hauser to Detroit for #21 would be about the max draft capital value for Hauser. This opened up the door for me to ponder the following trade scenario.

move #1 Giannis is traded to (insert non-Celtics team)

move #2 Celtics trade #27 to Bucks for Bobby Portis

move #3 Celtics trade Hauser + 40 + 2027 1st to Hornets for #18 (if Hauser alone could net #21 shouldn't Hauser +#40+2027 1st net #18?). This feels like a great spot in the draft to grab a slipping lottery talent.

I don't know that Hauser alone could get #21.  Either DET or CHA would need to have a means to accept Hauser's salary without sending something back.  Neither has a TPE large enough, I don't think.  But if BOS could trade Hauser to DET for pick #21 and a TPE, I would do that in a second.  Or even a future first round pick (which might be more realistic).

Re: Celtics trade thought dump
« Reply #2 on: Today at 09:24:39 AM »

Offline Celtics4ever

  • NCE
  • Johnny Most
  • ********************
  • Posts: 20511
  • Tommy Points: 1354
I don't think I would trade a proven NBA commodity like Sam Hauser for a draft pick we don't know if he will pan out.

I also think 40 could get us someone of value.

Re: Celtics trade thought dump
« Reply #3 on: Today at 10:17:13 AM »

Offline Vermont Green

  • Cedric Maxwell
  • **************
  • Posts: 14979
  • Tommy Points: 1106
I don't think I would trade a proven NBA commodity like Sam Hauser for a draft pick we don't know if he will pan out.

I also think 40 could get us someone of value.

The premise is that if you were able to trade Hauser for #21, you would end up with about $10M more in room under the tax.  You could then have that much more to spend on a free agent to hopefully get a better FA, or you sign another FA.  Right now, BOS can spend say $15M on a FA, trade Hauser and you could spend $20M or more on a FA and still be under the tax.  Plus you have the 21st pick which you could potentially package and move up or otherwise deploy.  Hauser is a useful player but easily replaced.  Scheierman may be able to replace him.

Re: Celtics trade thought dump
« Reply #4 on: Today at 11:15:17 AM »

Online DefenseWinsChamps

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7097
  • Tommy Points: 858
I don't think I would trade a proven NBA commodity like Sam Hauser for a draft pick we don't know if he will pan out.

I also think 40 could get us someone of value.

The premise is that if you were able to trade Hauser for #21, you would end up with about $10M more in room under the tax.  You could then have that much more to spend on a free agent to hopefully get a better FA, or you sign another FA.  Right now, BOS can spend say $15M on a FA, trade Hauser and you could spend $20M or more on a FA and still be under the tax.  Plus you have the 21st pick which you could potentially package and move up or otherwise deploy.  Hauser is a useful player but easily replaced.  Scheierman may be able to replace him.

It's a great thought. If you combine it with the use of our TPE, the end of the trade could be:

We lose Hauser
A third team gets Hauser and trades us a 1st
We trade two 1sts to a team like the Rockets for Smith Jr. or the Bucks for Turner.

Trading Hauser and one of 1sts for a stretch 5 difference-maker would be a roster upgrade.