Torn, tbh. I'm fine with the 65-game rule conceptually, but I kind of wonder if it may be having the opposite of the intended effect.
Look how many players are flirting with the line this season. Kind of feels like the goal has shifted from "play every game, if healthy" to "play 65-70 games for maximal rest over the course of the season while preserving award eligibility". Then the maintenance plan blows up for a few players when they get hurt down the stretch and can't hit the benchmark anymore.