Author Topic: Warriors want DWhite?lol  (Read 12680 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Warriors want DWhite?lol
« Reply #30 on: May 22, 2025, 10:43:11 AM »

Online Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 52246
  • Tommy Points: 2551
Podz is an interesting player.

I am not sure what he will be in the NBA yet. Mixed signals. He is still very young. Only 22 years old with 2 years experience. D White had not even made the NBA yet at the same age. Nor did he play much as a rookie. D White was 25 when he a season comparable to what Podz has done this year as a 21-22 year old.

I have been pleasantly surprised by how good Podz is on defense. I expected him to be a liability. A guy that was picked on relentlessly by opponents. Matchup hunted. He is not that. He has become a good defender. He provides good ball-pressure defense on ball-handling guards. He has enough physicality to handle bigger guards and handle himself well on switches. He is not a high level defensive player but he is a useful defensive player.

His rebounding has been stellar. He is pulling down 7 rebounds per 36 minutes as a short SG. Those are numbers you would be very happy with from an athletic SF. Nevermind a guy like Podz.

His ball-handling and passing are good. Good secondary level facilitator. Not a main playmaker. But a guy from the weakside who can attack defenses when the ball is swung over. Who can create for himself or others.

His shooting and scoring are the biggest question marks for me. He has been inconsistent thus far. He showed promise as a rookie. Then stunk up the joint for the 1st half of the season. Shot the ball brilliantly late in the season. Then struggled again in the playoffs. I see this as the big variable in his development that will decide whether he can be a 15-18ppg threat or if he is an 11-12ppg threat. A 3rd / 4th option or a 4th / 5th option.

I wouldn't be surprised either way, in terms of his development, whether he becomes a very good offensive player or not. Whether shot does become consistent or continues to be up and down.

Podz could be a highly valuable player if that shot does become consistent.

Re: Warriors want DWhite?lol
« Reply #31 on: May 22, 2025, 10:51:55 AM »

Online Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 52246
  • Tommy Points: 2551
I don't see how Podz helps this team let alone is worth White. He is average in every sense of the word.

No thank you to anything GS has. That 12 points a game and 5 rebounds a game is what an average bench player brings you. Not a starter.

Just generally here ....

In terms of getting below the 2nd Apron and cutting luxury tax payments, all of these trade ideas will make Boston worse. We will be dumping a superior player (Jrue, Porzingis, D White, Hauser) for an inferior player.

These are not trades that make the team better. They are not trades that allow the team to stay on the same level. They are trades that will make the team worse. All of them.

If the team cuts salary to get below the 2nd Apron, that is what will happen. The only way the team stays whole is if the team refuses to cut salary and agrees to stay above the 2nd Apron and pay the huge luxury tax bill as a result.


Which is why there is a push to move on from the older and more injury prone players instead of White.

Exactly. Move Jrue. Move Kp. Al retires. Move Sam.

Keep PP. White. JB and JT. White is never hurt and plays hard every night. He is not "old" and needs to be moved on from.

I agree. Jrue should be 1st choice to move. Porzingis 2nd choice.

If those options do not materialize though -- if the options on the table cannot generate large enough salary cuts to get below the 2nd Apron -- we may have to move D White. A 3rd choice option. Not a 1st choice or even 2nd choice option.

If that is the case I would shop Brown and see if you can get something good for him. He is not worth $54 million.

That is an interesting option:

(1) Keep Jaylen & Tatum as our top 2 scoring options and rebuild supporting cast around them

(2) Trade Jaylen. Keep D White. D White and Tatum as foundation. Replace Jaylen as 2nd scoring option.


After seeing a number of teams misfire in the playoffs due to poor or non-existent 2nd options, I have rediscovered my admiration for Jaylen as our #2.

Re: Warriors want DWhite?lol
« Reply #32 on: May 22, 2025, 10:58:49 AM »

Online DefenseWinsChamps

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6508
  • Tommy Points: 792
In another thread I posted these moves as a possibility.  I've added the White trade from this thread.

Trade 1 with Houston
Brown for Sheppard, Brooks, Smith, Eason, 2025 1st (10), 2027 PHX 1st, 2028 HOU 1st

Trade 2 with Detroit
Porzingis for Stewart, Fontecchio, 2026 DET 1st (lotto protected)

Trade 3 with San Antonio
Holiday for Vassell

Trade 4 with Brooklyn
Hauser for 36 and future protected 2nd

Trade 5 with GS, Brooklyn
White for Hield, Podz, GS 28 1st

New roster for next year
PG - Sheppard, Pritchard
SG - Vassell, Podz, Fontecchio
SF - Brooks, Hield, Scheireman
PF - Smith, Eason
C - Stewart, Tillman
10 + 28 + Tatum on IR + 36 (Stash or 2way)
Cut or dump Walsh

That team is not the worst team in the league, but a clear lottery team. 

Summer of 26 the guys under contract for 26-27 would be Sheppard, Vassell, Pritchard, Podz, Brooks, Hield, Stewart, Tatum, Scheireman, 10, 28, BOS 26 Lotto pick, Det 26 non-lotto pick.  So some cap room, though moving Vassell, Stewart, and/or Brooks at deadline next year for an expiring would free up a max or near max slot (or you can use them as the salary filler in a trade for a star). 

Boston needs to infuse the team with youth and high end draft picks because I truly believe the championship window is over.  It definitely closed with Tatum's injury, but if the Knicks series is any indication, it might have been over anyway. They need to do something differently than just run it back and take a gap year.  They aren't contending after a gap year, the team is too old too injury prone and frankly not good enough.

That team would not be worth watching and does a disservice to Tatum in 2026. No offense, but every trade you listed would be hot trash.

Championship window isn't closed.

I have to agree. I don't mind the concept of overhauling the team, even though I don't think the championship window is closed.

But these trades do not get us closer to a championship. They move us further away, not only in the short-term, but in the long-term.

This trade only makes sense if you think Podz, Vassell, Smith, or Sheppard have some untapped all-star potential. I like 3 of the 4, but don't see any of them as being a second banana on a championship team.
the trades also give you 10 in this draft, boston's 26 lotto pick, and several other 1st round picks.  The team also gets under the actual salary cap.  The flexibility is there to make moves. That is the point of the trades i.e. get a handful of lottery picks, cap space, and future picks.

That sets the team up to compete again in 27 or 28 season, because remember even if Tatum eventually gets back to what he was i.e. borderline top 5 player, it won't be next year and probably won't be until the end of 27 or 28.  1 year back to playing, 2 years back to normal is pretty typical for that injury and normal is often not peak. Every meaningful player, other than Tatum would be in their 30's then and most of them are already injury prone. 

This core had an excellent run, but it is over.

What do you lose by only trading 1 of the guys like Zinger or Holliday to get under the 2nd apron? Zinger's value I think can only improve this year. Holliday's value may decline some if you don't trade him now. Both Brown and White's value stay the same.

There's just no advantage to selling everything low for a bunch prospects that best-case may be fringe all-stars. Adding a bunch of mid-range 1sts don't really change that.

Re: Warriors want DWhite?lol
« Reply #33 on: May 22, 2025, 10:59:45 AM »

Offline Donoghus

  • Global Moderator
  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32502
  • Tommy Points: 1721
  • What a Pub Should Be
I don't see how Podz helps this team let alone is worth White. He is average in every sense of the word.

No thank you to anything GS has. That 12 points a game and 5 rebounds a game is what an average bench player brings you. Not a starter.

Just generally here ....

In terms of getting below the 2nd Apron and cutting luxury tax payments, all of these trade ideas will make Boston worse. We will be dumping a superior player (Jrue, Porzingis, D White, Hauser) for an inferior player.

These are not trades that make the team better. They are not trades that allow the team to stay on the same level. They are trades that will make the team worse. All of them.

If the team cuts salary to get below the 2nd Apron, that is what will happen. The only way the team stays whole is if the team refuses to cut salary and agrees to stay above the 2nd Apron and pay the huge luxury tax bill as a result.


Which is why there is a push to move on from the older and more injury prone players instead of White.

Exactly. Move Jrue. Move Kp. Al retires. Move Sam.

Keep PP. White. JB and JT. White is never hurt and plays hard every night. He is not "old" and needs to be moved on from.

I agree. Jrue should be 1st choice to move. Porzingis 2nd choice.

If those options do not materialize though -- if the options on the table cannot generate large enough salary cuts to get below the 2nd Apron -- we may have to move D White. A 3rd choice option. Not a 1st choice or even 2nd choice option.

If that is the case I would shop Brown and see if you can get something good for him. He is not worth $54 million.

That is an interesting option:

(1) Keep Jaylen & Tatum as our top 2 scoring options and rebuild supporting cast around them

(2) Trade Jaylen. Keep D White. D White and Tatum as foundation. Replace Jaylen as 2nd scoring option.


After seeing a number of teams misfire in the playoffs due to poor or non-existent 2nd options, I have rediscovered my admiration for Jaylen as our #2.

Brown is proven as a #2.  I think moving him should be of last resort or if some insane offer comes along.  I'd prefer to keep a core of Tatu/Brown/White and go from there.


2010 CB Historical Draft - Best Overall Team

Re: Warriors want DWhite?lol
« Reply #34 on: May 22, 2025, 11:03:15 AM »

Offline celticinorlando

  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32605
  • Tommy Points: 834
  • Larry Bird for President
I don't see how Podz helps this team let alone is worth White. He is average in every sense of the word.

No thank you to anything GS has. That 12 points a game and 5 rebounds a game is what an average bench player brings you. Not a starter.

Just generally here ....

In terms of getting below the 2nd Apron and cutting luxury tax payments, all of these trade ideas will make Boston worse. We will be dumping a superior player (Jrue, Porzingis, D White, Hauser) for an inferior player.

These are not trades that make the team better. They are not trades that allow the team to stay on the same level. They are trades that will make the team worse. All of them.

If the team cuts salary to get below the 2nd Apron, that is what will happen. The only way the team stays whole is if the team refuses to cut salary and agrees to stay above the 2nd Apron and pay the huge luxury tax bill as a result.


Which is why there is a push to move on from the older and more injury prone players instead of White.

Exactly. Move Jrue. Move Kp. Al retires. Move Sam.

Keep PP. White. JB and JT. White is never hurt and plays hard every night. He is not "old" and needs to be moved on from.

I agree. Jrue should be 1st choice to move. Porzingis 2nd choice.

If those options do not materialize though -- if the options on the table cannot generate large enough salary cuts to get below the 2nd Apron -- we may have to move D White. A 3rd choice option. Not a 1st choice or even 2nd choice option.

If that is the case I would shop Brown and see if you can get something good for him. He is not worth $54 million.

That is an interesting option:

(1) Keep Jaylen & Tatum as our top 2 scoring options and rebuild supporting cast around them

(2) Trade Jaylen. Keep D White. D White and Tatum as foundation. Replace Jaylen as 2nd scoring option.


After seeing a number of teams misfire in the playoffs due to poor or non-existent 2nd options, I have rediscovered my admiration for Jaylen as our #2.

It just might be that no team wants to take on Holiday or KP and they are forced to move Brown.

Re: Warriors want DWhite?lol
« Reply #35 on: May 22, 2025, 11:44:46 AM »

Offline PAOBoston

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8128
  • Tommy Points: 535
I would consider trading White under the right circumstances. He?s their best chip that could result in a haul not named Tatum or Brown. He?d also be a terrifying fit on that GS team. Shades of Iguodala. That being said, think it would have to be some sort of three team deal as Podz doesn?t really interest me. Only player I would be slightly intrigued by is Kuminga and future GS picks.

Re: Warriors want DWhite?lol
« Reply #36 on: May 22, 2025, 01:09:30 PM »

Online Moranis

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34346
  • Tommy Points: 1592
In another thread I posted these moves as a possibility.  I've added the White trade from this thread.

Trade 1 with Houston
Brown for Sheppard, Brooks, Smith, Eason, 2025 1st (10), 2027 PHX 1st, 2028 HOU 1st

Trade 2 with Detroit
Porzingis for Stewart, Fontecchio, 2026 DET 1st (lotto protected)

Trade 3 with San Antonio
Holiday for Vassell

Trade 4 with Brooklyn
Hauser for 36 and future protected 2nd

Trade 5 with GS, Brooklyn
White for Hield, Podz, GS 28 1st

New roster for next year
PG - Sheppard, Pritchard
SG - Vassell, Podz, Fontecchio
SF - Brooks, Hield, Scheireman
PF - Smith, Eason
C - Stewart, Tillman
10 + 28 + Tatum on IR + 36 (Stash or 2way)
Cut or dump Walsh

That team is not the worst team in the league, but a clear lottery team. 

Summer of 26 the guys under contract for 26-27 would be Sheppard, Vassell, Pritchard, Podz, Brooks, Hield, Stewart, Tatum, Scheireman, 10, 28, BOS 26 Lotto pick, Det 26 non-lotto pick.  So some cap room, though moving Vassell, Stewart, and/or Brooks at deadline next year for an expiring would free up a max or near max slot (or you can use them as the salary filler in a trade for a star). 

Boston needs to infuse the team with youth and high end draft picks because I truly believe the championship window is over.  It definitely closed with Tatum's injury, but if the Knicks series is any indication, it might have been over anyway. They need to do something differently than just run it back and take a gap year.  They aren't contending after a gap year, the team is too old too injury prone and frankly not good enough.

That team would not be worth watching and does a disservice to Tatum in 2026. No offense, but every trade you listed would be hot trash.

Championship window isn't closed.

I have to agree. I don't mind the concept of overhauling the team, even though I don't think the championship window is closed.

But these trades do not get us closer to a championship. They move us further away, not only in the short-term, but in the long-term.

This trade only makes sense if you think Podz, Vassell, Smith, or Sheppard have some untapped all-star potential. I like 3 of the 4, but don't see any of them as being a second banana on a championship team.
the trades also give you 10 in this draft, boston's 26 lotto pick, and several other 1st round picks.  The team also gets under the actual salary cap.  The flexibility is there to make moves. That is the point of the trades i.e. get a handful of lottery picks, cap space, and future picks.

That sets the team up to compete again in 27 or 28 season, because remember even if Tatum eventually gets back to what he was i.e. borderline top 5 player, it won't be next year and probably won't be until the end of 27 or 28.  1 year back to playing, 2 years back to normal is pretty typical for that injury and normal is often not peak. Every meaningful player, other than Tatum would be in their 30's then and most of them are already injury prone. 

This core had an excellent run, but it is over.

What do you lose by only trading 1 of the guys like Zinger or Holliday to get under the 2nd apron? Zinger's value I think can only improve this year. Holliday's value may decline some if you don't trade him now. Both Brown and White's value stay the same.

There's just no advantage to selling everything low for a bunch prospects that best-case may be fringe all-stars. Adding a bunch of mid-range 1sts don't really change that.
There are still repeater tax issues, but aside from that, I just don't see this core being a real title contender again.  They are going to keep losing depth pieces which was the real strength of the team and how they could outlast teams on the way to the finals.  Look at Denver and Milwaukee (or even GS) and how hard it was for them with a true legit All Time Great to sustain their level of play.  They were 1 and done with a far better player at the top of the roster than Boston has had since KG blew out his knee.

The simple reality is Boston was a 2nd round playoff team this year and they don't have a single key player still ascending. Tatum is out a year. This season is the best this group is going to be and that is a 2nd round and out team. 
2023 Historical Draft - Brooklyn Nets - 9th pick

Bigs - Pau, Amar'e, Issel, McGinnis, Roundfield
Wings - Dantley, Bowen, J. Jackson
Guards - Cheeks, Petrovic, Buse, Rip

Re: Warriors want DWhite?lol
« Reply #37 on: May 22, 2025, 01:42:44 PM »

Offline jambr380

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13651
  • Tommy Points: 2056
  • Everybody knows what's best for you
In another thread I posted these moves as a possibility.  I've added the White trade from this thread.

Trade 1 with Houston
Brown for Sheppard, Brooks, Smith, Eason, 2025 1st (10), 2027 PHX 1st, 2028 HOU 1st

Trade 2 with Detroit
Porzingis for Stewart, Fontecchio, 2026 DET 1st (lotto protected)

Trade 3 with San Antonio
Holiday for Vassell

Trade 4 with Brooklyn
Hauser for 36 and future protected 2nd

Trade 5 with GS, Brooklyn
White for Hield, Podz, GS 28 1st

New roster for next year
PG - Sheppard, Pritchard
SG - Vassell, Podz, Fontecchio
SF - Brooks, Hield, Scheireman
PF - Smith, Eason
C - Stewart, Tillman
10 + 28 + Tatum on IR + 36 (Stash or 2way)
Cut or dump Walsh

That team is not the worst team in the league, but a clear lottery team. 

Summer of 26 the guys under contract for 26-27 would be Sheppard, Vassell, Pritchard, Podz, Brooks, Hield, Stewart, Tatum, Scheireman, 10, 28, BOS 26 Lotto pick, Det 26 non-lotto pick.  So some cap room, though moving Vassell, Stewart, and/or Brooks at deadline next year for an expiring would free up a max or near max slot (or you can use them as the salary filler in a trade for a star). 

Boston needs to infuse the team with youth and high end draft picks because I truly believe the championship window is over.  It definitely closed with Tatum's injury, but if the Knicks series is any indication, it might have been over anyway. They need to do something differently than just run it back and take a gap year.  They aren't contending after a gap year, the team is too old too injury prone and frankly not good enough.

That team would not be worth watching and does a disservice to Tatum in 2026. No offense, but every trade you listed would be hot trash.

Championship window isn't closed.

I have to agree. I don't mind the concept of overhauling the team, even though I don't think the championship window is closed.

But these trades do not get us closer to a championship. They move us further away, not only in the short-term, but in the long-term.

This trade only makes sense if you think Podz, Vassell, Smith, or Sheppard have some untapped all-star potential. I like 3 of the 4, but don't see any of them as being a second banana on a championship team.
the trades also give you 10 in this draft, boston's 26 lotto pick, and several other 1st round picks.  The team also gets under the actual salary cap.  The flexibility is there to make moves. That is the point of the trades i.e. get a handful of lottery picks, cap space, and future picks.

That sets the team up to compete again in 27 or 28 season, because remember even if Tatum eventually gets back to what he was i.e. borderline top 5 player, it won't be next year and probably won't be until the end of 27 or 28.  1 year back to playing, 2 years back to normal is pretty typical for that injury and normal is often not peak. Every meaningful player, other than Tatum would be in their 30's then and most of them are already injury prone. 

This core had an excellent run, but it is over.

What do you lose by only trading 1 of the guys like Zinger or Holliday to get under the 2nd apron? Zinger's value I think can only improve this year. Holliday's value may decline some if you don't trade him now. Both Brown and White's value stay the same.

There's just no advantage to selling everything low for a bunch prospects that best-case may be fringe all-stars. Adding a bunch of mid-range 1sts don't really change that.
There are still repeater tax issues, but aside from that, I just don't see this core being a real title contender again.  They are going to keep losing depth pieces which was the real strength of the team and how they could outlast teams on the way to the finals.  Look at Denver and Milwaukee (or even GS) and how hard it was for them with a true legit All Time Great to sustain their level of play.  They were 1 and done with a far better player at the top of the roster than Boston has had since KG blew out his knee.

The simple reality is Boston was a 2nd round playoff team this year and they don't have a single key player still ascending. Tatum is out a year. This season is the best this group is going to be and that is a 2nd round and out team.

I understand that we need to make some changes financially, but the team won 61 games with guys in and out of the lineup. You aren?t even taking injuries into consideration. Healthy, they are not only a better team than NYK, but a much better team.

That?s not how it worked out and the past is now the past, but let?s not pretend that this Celtics team is washed. If Tatum came back to this exact team next season, they are likely favored to make the Finals

Re: Warriors want DWhite?lol
« Reply #38 on: May 22, 2025, 02:28:26 PM »

Online Moranis

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34346
  • Tommy Points: 1592
Boston was down 3-1 and going to lose this series whether Tatum got hurt or not.  I get Porzingis has some mystery illness and Brown was a bit banged up, but they both played in every game (and Brown played heavy minutes and he was really good against the Magic the prior round).  It is fun to play the what if game, but in the reality world I live in, Boston was a 2nd round team this year.  Same as the 64 win Cavs, but at least the Cavs have Mobley still ascending (and maybe Garland) and every key player in their 20's.

Boston is only going to get worse going forward because of the money, the age, and the health of the main players.  It isn't sustainable and we all knew this. Look at all the chatter about how this team had till the end of next season before it would become too expensive.  And injury to Tatum doesn't push that back, it should in fact move it up to now.   Delaying just puts off the inevitable and makes players far less valuable in trades.  Tatum's injury changes everything (or at least it should).
2023 Historical Draft - Brooklyn Nets - 9th pick

Bigs - Pau, Amar'e, Issel, McGinnis, Roundfield
Wings - Dantley, Bowen, J. Jackson
Guards - Cheeks, Petrovic, Buse, Rip

Re: Warriors want DWhite?lol
« Reply #39 on: May 22, 2025, 05:22:58 PM »

Online Birdman

  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10198
  • Tommy Points: 462
Pritchard can be the starting PG if need to be..u can not rely on Porzingis as he miss almost all the playoffs the last 2 years?Al May retire so this team needs a big man sorely
C/PF-Horford, Baynes, Noel, Theis, Morris,
SF/SG- Tatum, Brown, Hayward, Smart, Semi, Clark
PG- Irving, Rozier, Larkin

Re: Warriors want DWhite?lol
« Reply #40 on: May 22, 2025, 06:03:14 PM »

Offline Neurotic Guy

  • Tommy Heinsohn
  • *************************
  • Posts: 25412
  • Tommy Points: 2716
Boston was down 3-1 and going to lose this series whether Tatum got hurt or not.  I get Porzingis has some mystery illness and Brown was a bit banged up, but they both played in every game (and Brown played heavy minutes and he was really good against the Magic the prior round).  It is fun to play the what if game, but in the reality world I live in, Boston was a 2nd round team this year.  Same as the 64 win Cavs, but at least the Cavs have Mobley still ascending (and maybe Garland) and every key player in their 20's.

Boston is only going to get worse going forward because of the money, the age, and the health of the main players.  It isn't sustainable and we all knew this. Look at all the chatter about how this team had till the end of next season before it would become too expensive.  And injury to Tatum doesn't push that back, it should in fact move it up to now.   Delaying just puts off the inevitable and makes players far less valuable in trades.  Tatum's injury changes everything (or at least it should).

Great to have you back. You were missed (by most!).

Your analysis is negative so a touch away from realistic but not too far off IMO.  Brown had  a torn meniscus which is worse than a little banged up.  Though he had some good games, his lift was not as it was and he couldn?t play at the high level consistently.  KPs illness took him from all-star caliber center to basically a third string center.  So you are correct that  the Cs probably would have lost the series if JT hadn?t been injured, but 40% of the starting lineup wasn?t right.  Therefore I?m not as much in the *it?s only getting worse from here* camp as you are.  I?m not convinced the current base isn?t capable of another run.  But I?m good with Brad making the call - continue this as the Jays team with DWhite, KP, PP and maybe Jrue.  Or, big moves including JB on the market, maybe DWhite, and see what youth, draft capital, and cap engineering could be done to plan a second wave with JT as center piece.  Obviously that means Jrue and KP gone. Pritchard, given value and age is probably a keeper.  Fingers crossed that Schierman can be as valuable someday as Nesmith is turning out to be (wish he was here but I don?t regret getting Jrue which wouldn?t have happened without the Nesmith trade).

Re: Warriors want DWhite?lol
« Reply #41 on: May 22, 2025, 09:38:25 PM »

Online Moranis

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34346
  • Tommy Points: 1592
Boston was down 3-1 and going to lose this series whether Tatum got hurt or not.  I get Porzingis has some mystery illness and Brown was a bit banged up, but they both played in every game (and Brown played heavy minutes and he was really good against the Magic the prior round).  It is fun to play the what if game, but in the reality world I live in, Boston was a 2nd round team this year.  Same as the 64 win Cavs, but at least the Cavs have Mobley still ascending (and maybe Garland) and every key player in their 20's.

Boston is only going to get worse going forward because of the money, the age, and the health of the main players.  It isn't sustainable and we all knew this. Look at all the chatter about how this team had till the end of next season before it would become too expensive.  And injury to Tatum doesn't push that back, it should in fact move it up to now.   Delaying just puts off the inevitable and makes players far less valuable in trades.  Tatum's injury changes everything (or at least it should).

Great to have you back. You were missed (by most!).

Your analysis is negative so a touch away from realistic but not too far off IMO.  Brown had  a torn meniscus which is worse than a little banged up.  Though he had some good games, his lift was not as it was and he couldn?t play at the high level consistently.  KPs illness took him from all-star caliber center to basically a third string center.  So you are correct that  the Cs probably would have lost the series if JT hadn?t been injured, but 40% of the starting lineup wasn?t right.  Therefore I?m not as much in the *it?s only getting worse from here* camp as you are.  I?m not convinced the current base isn?t capable of another run.  But I?m good with Brad making the call - continue this as the Jays team with DWhite, KP, PP and maybe Jrue.  Or, big moves including JB on the market, maybe DWhite, and see what youth, draft capital, and cap engineering could be done to plan a second wave with JT as center piece.  Obviously that means Jrue and KP gone. Pritchard, given value and age is probably a keeper.  Fingers crossed that Schierman can be as valuable someday as Nesmith is turning out to be (wish he was here but I don?t regret getting Jrue which wouldn?t have happened without the Nesmith trade).
Brown was actually better in the playoffs against the Knicks than he was in the regular season.  The Knicks are just a horrible matchup for Brown and frankly the C's overall. They built a team designed to beat Boston.  They have 3 big wing defenders in Bridges, Hart, and OG, they have great rim protection with Robinson, one of the most skilled offensive big men in the sport with Towns, and an incredible offensive engine at their point of attack in Brunson.  They like to play hardnosed and slow it down.  If you were designing the type of team to beat Boston, it would be the Knicks.  I know Boston beat them every game in the regular season, but the playoffs are just a different animal.  Even getting by the Knicks, I'm not sure how well they would have handled the Pacers pace.  They are a much better team than they were last year and those games were all close tough wins. 

All that said, even if you thought with good health, Boston was winning the title this year (I don't think they would have beaten OKC even if they came out of the East), it would have been harder than it was last year, and the team is only going to get worse while other teams will continue to improve.  Boston has no flexibility given the age, health, and cost of the roster.  And all of that is only going to compound.  With Tatum getting hurt and the team having no shot at winning the title next year, they have to make moves if they want to compete for titles any time over the next several seasons.  Taking a gap year next year only to come back with a similar team that is now 2 years older and still in cap hell, just doesn't make sense.
2023 Historical Draft - Brooklyn Nets - 9th pick

Bigs - Pau, Amar'e, Issel, McGinnis, Roundfield
Wings - Dantley, Bowen, J. Jackson
Guards - Cheeks, Petrovic, Buse, Rip

Re: Warriors want DWhite?lol
« Reply #42 on: May 22, 2025, 10:32:41 PM »

Online Goldstar88

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13230
  • Tommy Points: 1697
Pritchard can be the starting PG if need to be..u can not rely on Porzingis as he miss almost all the playoffs the last 2 years?Al May retire so this team needs a big man sorely

No he can?t. Knicks hunted Pritchard the whole series. He?s not good enough defensively to be the starting PG.
« Last Edit: May 22, 2025, 10:37:44 PM by Goldstar88 »
Quoting Nick from the now locked Ime thread:
Quote
At some point you have to blame the performance on the court on the players on the court. Every loss is not the coach's fault and every win isn't because of the players.