You know, for all the criticism about this game and all the threes shot - including from myself, at least regarding the quality of threes we were taking early - we hit 39% of our threes (good) and they hit 54% of their threes (outstanding). Altogether both teams were a combined 23 for 96 for 45%.
Like, a lot of us complain about the quality of the threes we take, but 45% from three on close to 100 attempts is an excellent percentage. Yeah, it's a lot of threes and different from how the game has always been played, but it's hard to really argue when they're hitting that percentage of their threes. I think it'd be different if teams were consistently shooting those threes with low percentages, but at that point there's a natural regression to the mean because it doesn't make sense to keep shooting that volume.
I'm not really a fan of us shooting 57 threes a night, but if we're both (a) hitting at a good clip, and (b) they're primarily quality looks from three, then the volume argument shouldn't hold much weight.